Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
A Camera That "You Just Like."
Page <<first <prev 7 of 12 next> last>>
Dec 3, 2023 17:57:29   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
WDCash wrote:
Lovely Loon



Reply
Dec 3, 2023 18:04:40   #
etaoin Loc: Wichita, KS
 
I have the D850 and good lenses, but my favorite is the D750 with battery grip and the 24-120 f/4G kit lens. Perfect walkabout setup, in my opinion. The popup flash comes in handy for fill flash when needed.

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 18:29:33   #
RightOnPhotography Loc: Quebec,QC
 
radiojohn wrote:
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a camera that you just like?

It could be ease of use, results, handling, fun to use or any of those and more. It may even be a camera that you return to even when, by some measures, it is obsolete.

My 2012 Pentax X-5 "Superzoom" 16 MP bridge camera is one. I was surprised they were still going for around $120 when most others from that time were $30.

Fast handling, easy control, but not much manual exposure options and a decent lens. It does have some visual highlight/shadow warnings that are handy in the less-than-perfect EVF. More than once I've returned to it, or rediscovered shots taken with it that I liked.

Thoughts?
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a cam... (show quote)


Since you are talking about Pentax, I loved my Pentax K-1.

Reply
 
 
Dec 3, 2023 19:29:18   #
lesmyers Loc: old town maine
 
And the Nikon F2. I have Canon EOS cameras, and I am always a little surprised when I pick up and use the F2- heavy! But gee- solid!

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 20:13:37   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
My 1952 Ikoflex 1a. It belonged to my late Father. It is in fantastic condition. Full disclosure... I haven't shot one frame with it since about 1960. Why? Because it is a PITA to use. It is a slow, very methodical type of camera.

My day to day camera is a Nikon Z9. And I LOVE it!

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 20:23:03   #
Wyantry Loc: SW Colorado
 
radiojohn wrote:
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a camera that you just like?

It could be ease of use, results, handling, fun to use or any of those and more. It may even be a camera that you return to even when, by some measures, it is obsolete.

My 2012 Pentax X-5 "Superzoom" 16 MP bridge camera is one. I was surprised they were still going for around $120 when most others from that time were $30.

Fast handling, easy control, but not much manual exposure options and a decent lens. It does have some visual highlight/shadow warnings that are handy in the less-than-perfect EVF. More than once I've returned to it, or rediscovered shots taken with it that I liked.

Thoughts?
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a cam... (show quote)


It may be amusing, but the cameras I really liked the best were, in order:

A). My first 35mm - a Pentax Spotmatic. The match-needle was good and gave a nice visual indication of exposure. A real pain to change lenses (screw thread), but solid & reliable. Survived Viet Nam, 1968 - ‘69. (*)

B). Canon Pellix — >See. >Point. >Shoot. No mirror-flop. Full view all the time. Great.

And,

C). Pentax Optio W90 GPS— Pocket camera. 12Mp. Not “great” quality pictures, but adequate. GPS is a great bonus. (And GPS is why I got it — to take photographs of geological features with location-tags). Waterproof as well.

And,

D). Canon 60D — The current workhorse. Adapted to microscope use via Live View on iPad. Great!

And,

NIKONOS II w/ two lenses & UW Flash. Solid. Heavy.


(*) In Viet Nam: got Bronica S2A+ three lenses & Hasselblad 500C w/ two lenses. Customs officer was REALLY upset when I came through — could not charge duties! Should have kept the Hassie . . . .

Reply
Dec 3, 2023 23:27:29   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
radiojohn wrote:
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a camera that you just like?

It could be ease of use, results, handling, fun to use or any of those and more. It may even be a camera that you return to even when, by some measures, it is obsolete.

My 2012 Pentax X-5 "Superzoom" 16 MP bridge camera is one. I was surprised they were still going for around $120 when most others from that time were $30.

Fast handling, easy control, but not much manual exposure options and a decent lens. It does have some visual highlight/shadow warnings that are handy in the less-than-perfect EVF. More than once I've returned to it, or rediscovered shots taken with it that I liked.



Thoughts?
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a cam... (show quote)
I have several cameras. Which camera do I like the best? The one I am holding. ;)

When I go out shooting, for me picking the camera is more a matter of which lens I want to use. Lately I have been picking Nikon Z lenses a lot.

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2023 00:45:20   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
If I could somehow meld my 5"x7" Deardorf, one of my Nikon F3HPs, and either of my current mirrored or mirrorless digital cameras (whose brand names are not worth mentioning here because that info is not relevant) together, it would be the ONE and ONLY camera I'd snag to accompany me while on a trip to the Post Office.

But I can't. Because that's not possible.

But today, I snagged --instead of snagging what among my present shooters would be considered the 'best' of my gear-- the 'least' of the lot because, being Sunday (--and had I'd gone there [which I did not], the door of the Post Office would be unlocked, my mailbox would be accessible, and there'd be no mail today--) the camera (ok, the 'system' of body and lenses) I grabbed was the 'least' of my cameras. And I hadn't used it in a while.

I'll be posting a shot that my 'least' of cameras shot anon. That shot is absolutely the best shot I shot today. And nobody'll be able to tell it apart from my usual fare. (Or maybe they will because there's people in it for a change.)

Reply
Dec 4, 2023 00:59:52   #
ImageCreator Loc: Northern California
 
I’m totally satisfied with my Canon 5D4 and 5DSR. They do everything I ask of them. If I was rich and infamous I don’t know if I’d upgrade. They are like a good woman. Would I divorce her for just a minor flaw?

Reply
Dec 4, 2023 05:44:38   #
BebuLamar
 
ImageCreator wrote:
I’m totally satisfied with my Canon 5D4 and 5DSR. They do everything I ask of them. If I was rich and infamous I don’t know if I’d upgrade. They are like a good woman. Would I divorce her for just a minor flaw?


I am not an upgrade kind of guy but...I know you didn't say I do when the priest said "till dead do us part" when you bought the camera.

Reply
Dec 4, 2023 07:38:35   #
whfowle Loc: Tampa first, now Albuquerque
 
When I shoot film, it is my Nikon FM2n. Digital is my Fujifilm X-T1. Simple to use, light and easy to carry everywhere. These work for 90% of what I shoot.

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2023 08:24:59   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Strodav wrote:
The body I most enjoy using is a Nikon D7200 24mp DX. I have a few bodies including a D850 and Z9 and both have features well beyond the capabilities of the D7200, but I get a smile on my face when I can use the D7200.


There is something about a D7200 that makes me grab for it, often leaving newer, more expensive cameras at home.
With one camera I can spend a day with just the 35mm F/1.8 dx and a 500mm F/5.6 pf.

---

Reply
Dec 4, 2023 08:52:18   #
RonDavis Loc: Chicago, IL
 
radiojohn wrote:
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a camera that you just like?

It could be ease of use, results, handling, fun to use or any of those and more. It may even be a camera that you return to even when, by some measures, it is obsolete.

My 2012 Pentax X-5 "Superzoom" 16 MP bridge camera is one. I was surprised they were still going for around $120 when most others from that time were $30.

Fast handling, easy control, but not much manual exposure options and a decent lens. It does have some visual highlight/shadow warnings that are handy in the less-than-perfect EVF. More than once I've returned to it, or rediscovered shots taken with it that I liked.

Thoughts?
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a cam... (show quote)

Even though I enjoy shooting with my Fuji X100V, I have more confidence with my (neglected) XT-2 than any others I own. With my favorite lens (16-55) attached, It’s (now considered) big and heavy, but still soooo reliable…..that makes it my all-time favorite!

Reply
Dec 4, 2023 09:28:51   #
OldIkon Loc: Indiana, USA
 
mffox wrote:
I'm stuck on my Olympus PEN-F. It just feels right, reminds me of my film days with an Olympus Pen.


I thought hard about buying the digital Pen-F just because I love my film Pen FT - a camera I used up until starting digital. For most of my photography in those years - family travel and kids growing up - half-frame was all I needed, fit my budget and quality needs, and the camera was small, light, and comfortable to use. It also had a distinctive mirror and shutter noise unlike any other.

Reply
Dec 4, 2023 09:36:24   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
radiojohn wrote:
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a camera that you just like?

It could be ease of use, results, handling, fun to use or any of those and more. It may even be a camera that you return to even when, by some measures, it is obsolete.

My 2012 Pentax X-5 "Superzoom" 16 MP bridge camera is one. I was surprised they were still going for around $120 when most others from that time were $30.

Fast handling, easy control, but not much manual exposure options and a decent lens. It does have some visual highlight/shadow warnings that are handy in the less-than-perfect EVF. More than once I've returned to it, or rediscovered shots taken with it that I liked.

Thoughts?
Stepping away from comparing specs, is there a cam... (show quote)


I loved my Canon T3i - which is now being loved by my granddaughter. Great all-round camera.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.