Quote from Ansel Adams.
You don't take a photograph, you make it.
Ansel Adams
Source:
BrainyQuote.com
Don't look for me there, I ain't brainy enough.
bruce
Certainly how can you take a photograph? Unless I see a photograph left on the table and I pick it up.
BebuLamar wrote:
Certainly how can you take a photograph? Unless I see a photograph left on the table and I pick it up.
Hahahahaha yea Beb, I will remember this, save me some PP time with mice.
Thanks bro, be cool,
bruce
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
BebuLamar wrote:
Certainly how can you take a photograph? Unless I see a photograph left on the table and I pick it up.
Like many words “take” can have several meanings. Adams was an ‘artist’ so he used “make” meaning it was his end, just as an Elephant or Moses was the end that Michelangelo aimed for.
As a ‘Recorder’, my end is different. I use the phrase “take picture” as short for “capture the situation in a photo”, or “record the view in a photo”.
I’m sure you have seen a sign “Leave nothing but footprints; take nothing but pictures” - that doesn’t mean the park has hidden some pictures you should be looking for.
Ansel told me you you make the best exposure possible then post process
rehess wrote:
Like many words “take” can have several meanings. Adams was an ‘artist’ so he used “make” meaning it was his end, just as an Elephant or Moses was the end that Michelangelo aimed for.
As a ‘Recorder’, my end is different. I use the phrase “take picture” as short for “capture the situation in a photo”, or “record the view in a photo”.
I’m sure you have seen a sign “Leave nothing but footprints; take nothing but pictures” - that doesn’t mean the park has hidden some pictures you should be looking for.
Like many words “take” can have several meanings. ... (
show quote)
Any way still much better than the word "shoot". For the act of doing the same thing one verb is to taking in the other is shooting out.
BebuLamar wrote:
Certainly how can you take a photograph? Unless I see a photograph left on the table and I pick it up.
(Did I just hear a rim shot?)
Right on. I can't stand the pretentious phrase "Nice capture."
brentrh wrote:
Ansel told me you you make the best exposure possible then post process
It was the combination of exposure and film development that resulted in the best possible negative. The zone system is a sophisticated version of overexpose and under develop to decrease contrast, and underexpose and over develop to increase contrast.
revhen
Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
AA "made" his photos. Take Hernandez. There was a lot of detail and subtle gradations of clouds, etc. in the original negative and resulting print. He kept working with it and when he printed his last and most famous print there is dramatic contrast between light and dark with the loss of much detail. I have copies of three different treatments from the first to the last. There are those who complained that my avatar (see photo to the upper left.) was too lacking of detail. Someone even worked to over to retrieve the details. But the dramatic contrasts of what I did to the original has elicited much positive response: "The light shines in the darkness and the darkness has not overcome it." (John 1:5)
terryMc
Loc: Arizona's White Mountains
moonhawk wrote:
Right on. I can't stand the pretentious phrase "Nice capture."
Finally, someone who agrees with me!!! I thought I was the only one who has never "captured" a lion, an elephant, the moon or a constellation. I wouldn't know where to keep them or what to feed them...
But, But ... ... ... But, what about SOOC???!!!!
My way of thinking (some will say crazy, of course): TAKE the picture the best you can, then MAKE it what you want to be.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.