And sharpness is overrated. The most important of all tools in photography is the eye. If you don't have an eye for it, there's nothing can help. And it's pretty easy to see who does and who doesn't, don't you think?
Said by any True Photographer: lower your expectations to match your results.
CrazyJane wrote:
And sharpness is overrated. The most important of all tools in photography is the eye. If you don't have an eye for it, there's nothing can help. And it's pretty easy to see who does and who doesn't, don't you think?
Try shooting birds in flight or indoor low light action without specialized equipment and see how far your eyes get you.
You are correct, to a point.
The most important tool is, and always will be, the 6 inches or so behind the lens. This is largely why I leave the AI conversations to other people.
As for sharpness, one can overdo a good thing. There is a thing called Relative Sharpness that has more to do with the artistic aspect than anything else. This is another reason why AI powered anything does not concern me. I will be long dead before a machine will be able to attain insight into the human brain. IF it ever does.
Who can have a positive attitude about inferior results?
CrazyJane wrote:
And sharpness is overrated. The most important of all tools in photography is the eye. If you don't have an eye for it, there's nothing can help. And it's pretty easy to see who does and who doesn't, don't you think?
So an un-sharp photo is fine?
WOW, better start saving and posting those that are fuzzy and let you praise their great composition.
revhen
Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
Decent equipment is important. A good eye is even moreso.
Soft focus can be used for effect. It ain't very good when it ain't on purpose, though.
Nigel7
Loc: Worcestershire. UK.
Architect1776 wrote:
So an un-sharp photo is fine?
WOW, better start saving and posting those that are fuzzy and let you praise their great composition.
You want REALISTIC sharpness. Far too many photos spoilt by over-sharpening. Similarly over-saturation.
CrazyJane wrote:
And sharpness is overrated. The most important of all tools in photography is the eye. If you don't have an eye for it, there's nothing can help. And it's pretty easy to see who does and who doesn't, don't you think?
Rubbish and nonsense. Gear is not irrelevant -- a fact so easy to validate with the most cursory of looks at the behavior of artists that it's hard to conceive that anyone could miss it.
For example; here's an up and coming young guitarist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZhr41hL0-4He bought that guitar at Walmart because gear is irrelevant -- Oh wait a minute he's really playing one of these:
https://www.alhambraguitarras.com/en/guitarsCeramicists fuss over the clay they use and they don't use a Lazy Susan from Home Goods when they need a wheel.
Painters don't buy their paints from the Crayola Co. and they obsess over brushes.
I'm sure Rafael Aguirre would make his very best effort if he had to play a Walmart guitar. I'm also sure that we'd all be able to hear the difference and it would matter.
All the arts require gear to mediate the artist's expression. That gear either facilitates and enhances the artist's expression, or it detracts and so either way it matters.
Ysarex wrote:
Rubbish and nonsense. Gear is not irrelevant -- a fact so easy to validate with the most cursory of looks at the behavior of artists that it's hard to conceive that anyone could miss it.
For example; here's an up and coming young guitarist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZhr41hL0-4He bought that guitar at Walmart because gear is irrelevant -- Oh wait a minute he's really playing one of these:
https://www.alhambraguitarras.com/en/guitarsCeramicists fuss over the clay they use and they don't use a Lazy Susan from Home Goods when they need a wheel.
Painters don't buy their paints from the Crayola Co. and they obsess over brushes.
I'm sure Rafael Aguirre would make his very best effort if he had to play a Walmart guitar. I'm also sure that we'd all be able to hear the difference and it would matter.
All the arts require gear to mediate the artist's expression. That gear either facilitates and enhances the artist's expression, or it detracts and so either way it matters.
Rubbish and nonsense. Gear is not irrelevant -- a ... (
show quote)
All the guys who said gear is irrelevant tend to have the best gears.
A good eye alone is never quite enough. It also takes a little talent, knowledge, a good camera and a good lens to make that photo stunning. Wishing I had ALL of that.
The freedom to do your best means nothing unless you are willing to buy the best camera.
BebuLamar wrote:
All the guys who said gear is irrelevant tend to have the best gears.
And the latest as soon as it is announced.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.