Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Burst mode for landscapes?
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
Oct 14, 2023 10:12:26   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Is there any use for burst mode while shooting landscapes? Or is it done just because it can be done?

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 10:17:40   #
BebuLamar
 
Perhaps when you shoot the landscape from a moving train.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 10:18:58   #
Jimmy T Loc: Virginia
 
gvarner wrote:
Is there any use for burst mode while shooting landscapes? Or is it done just because it can be done?


I can imagine that "Burst Mode" could be helpful for handheld shots or for a breezy day.
I feel like I'm about to learn something here . . .
And that will make me . . .
Smile,
JimmyT Sends

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2023 10:34:32   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
To paraphrase Rockwell, when you shoot in a burst, you get three ish versions where one will tend to be better than the best in terms of focus. It does depend on a tripod vs hand-held, as well as how long is your burst. For landscape, static subjects, I'm more inclined to shoot multiple, subtle differences rather than exact the same in bursts. Do I focus in a different spot in the same frame? Vary the aperture? Reframe slightly? Hold the camera more steady or wait a second longer on the tripod? Keep the best, trash the rest, when I can see the 1:1 pixel-level details on my computer monitor at home.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 10:39:38   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
If nothing is moving in the scenic, why shoot burst?
Just more shots to go through, that will basically look identical.
Might come in handy for breakers in ocean shots though.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 10:41:53   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Imagine yourself as a successful photographer. Did you take too few or too many great images?

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 10:43:12   #
User ID
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Perhaps when you shoot the landscape from a moving train.

Or a winterscape, handheld with freezing trembling hands. At least one of those 25 frames will usually be steady. IOW, burst serves as a form of IS or can augment IS.

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2023 11:46:03   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
I use burst with exposure bracketing for potential HDR use.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 12:11:21   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I use burst with exposure bracketing for potential HDR use.


I think that’s the best application for the technique.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 13:02:04   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
gvarner wrote:
Is there any use for burst mode while shooting landscapes? Or is it done just because it can be done?


One needs about 40 fps to ensure that the get enough unique shots of the mountain and trees.
Actually I also see no need, as one will take their time to check composition etc . first then take the perfect shot.
Many here like bursts but you will need to ask why as there is a reason they do it.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 13:08:02   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Architect1776 wrote:
One needs about 40 fps to ensure that the get enough unique shots of the mountain and trees.
Actually I also see no need, as one will take their time to check composition etc . first then take the perfect shot.
Many here like bursts but you will need to ask why as there is a reason they do it.



(Because they can....)

Reply
 
 
Oct 14, 2023 13:25:16   #
Hal Masover Loc: Iowa and Florida
 

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 13:26:32   #
Hal Masover Loc: Iowa and Florida
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I use burst with exposure bracketing for potential HDR use.



Reply
Oct 14, 2023 13:29:30   #
photoman43
 
I use burst shooting for everything! Often the second or third image is sharper or has better color than just a single shot taken in S mode. Everything includes portraits, landscapes, macro, nature, flight shots, etc.

Reply
Oct 14, 2023 13:38:56   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
gvarner wrote:
Is there any use for burst mode while shooting landscapes? Or is it done just because it can be done?


There's something to be said for exposure bracketing, even if the dynamic range of the scene doesn't make it a necessity. It gives you an impressive safety net exposure-wise, and in addition to that, the darker exposures will have been taken with a faster shutter speed, so if there was some unnoticed movement, you have that extra insurance against motion blur spoiling your shot.

Instead of getting multiple shots of the same composition you would be better getting bracketed shots of several different compositions. It's very often the case that subtle (and sometimes not so subtle) composition differences separate the OK shots from the money shots.

Reply
Page 1 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.