dpullum wrote:
Yes, DirtFarmer blink test is another way ... as often said "more than one way to skin a cat."
The blink discribed in the reference is effort intensive. In my PSPro, I can click "go-back... go forward" curved arrows in top row and do a blink. In the actual topaz plugins... better called programs... clicking on the image does a quick and easy blink comparison.
Yes, to paraphrase it, 'there is more than one way to blink a cat'.
I described making an animated gif using Photoshop because I use PS a lot and I'm familiar with it so it's easy for me. I believe it can be done in GIMP as well (but I don't use GIMP much and would have to figure out how to align the images properly). I'm sure there is other software that would produce an animated gif.
But it can be done manually. Instead of making an animated gif, you can just put the two images in IrfanView windows (if you're using Windows) and align them manually, then switch between them. That can be done by placing both window icons on the taskbar next to each other and moving the cursor back and forth. This works in Win10. Haven't tried it in Win11 and my Win7 and Win8 are long gone. And you have described your own way in PSPro. I don't use a lot of different editors so I don't have methods involving anything other than IrfanView or PS but I'm sure that any editor that uses layers could show the two images on adjacent layers, then turning the visibility of the top layer on and off manually.
Since you have a method in PSPro, I would encourage you to produce a tutorial showing others how to do it. Tutorials can be just an ordinary thread, but I think there is an advantage to using a user page. An ordinary thread could present your method, and you could polish it within the hour allowed for editing or it could be polished in a later post. But that spreads the tutorial out. If you want to change the tutorial a month later, your changes show up later in the thread. If there are comments from others I the thread, your changes might be a page or three away from the original method. A user page can be edited at any time, even years later. (I encourage a note at the top of the page showing the change history). The only drawback to using the user page is that others can't comment on it. That is not a big problem because user pages don't get shown in any particular section, so you have to start a thread introducing the existence of the user page and put it in the appropriate section. Then people can comment on the introduction. A user page is public, but you have to advertise it.
If you're not familiar with user pages, I believe you can have 100 of them. They are produced just like an ordinary thread. I have a user page describing how to produce a user page at
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/user-page?upnum=2923. It is also useful to know how to place images into the text rather than have them all appear at the end of the post.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/user-page?upnum=2930. One limitation to a user page is that it has to be less than 15000 characters long. On one large study I exceeded that limit so I put the study into a PDF and attached it to a temporary thread on UHH. Then the PDF is stored on UHH and the URL can be used to refer to it.
Another note: if you have an image you want to use frequently, you can put it on the web somewhere that it will stay and have a distinct URL which you can use to place the image into the text of a post or a user page. I used to use my website but I'm getting old and at some point my website will disappear. So I post images I want to preserve on UHH, either on someone else's thread or on a thread of my own. The image will then be stored in UHH so it will be available as long as UHH is around. I can then use the URL of that image in a user page so I can easily find it.