Not a fan of this new lack of format (sigh) is there an option to see UHH the way it was?
sourdough58 wrote:
Not a fan of this new lack of format (sigh) is there an option to see UHH the way it was?
I'm still seeing "UHH" the way it was....
Do you mean
The Digest?
13
Loc: I am only responsible to what I say..not what
click on, "Home" in the upper left-hand corner of the webpage. Then it will be the same UHH. That's if you are on the "Digest" section.
What a relief, that fixed it, all sections were scrambled up.
The new format stinks to high heaven! At least there's a workaround that takes extra steps. Change for the sake of change is worthless.
Good to learn about the Home option. But the other button to sort by section is also ok. I don't mind clicking a button.
This is done of course to bring more views into some of the sections.
Longshadow wrote:
I'm still seeing "UHH" the way it was....
Do you mean The Digest?
Don’t see anything to click on called “The Digest”. I do see one called the “Latest Digest”.
sourdough58 wrote:
Not a fan of this new lack of format (sigh) is there an option to see UHH the way it was?
Actually UHH has not changed, and you can definitely see UHH the way it has been.
The change was only made to the
Digest, which is a daily
selection of the most active posts on the Forum. It is not a list of all new posts, so if you rely on the Digest, you will miss many of the new posts.
To quote UHH itself:
"The digest is run separately from the forum. So it's possible to be registered on the forum, but not signed up for the digest."
In fact, a large percentage of UHHers do not use the Digest. Rather, they have subscribed to the sections that interest them, so they are able to log in to the forum, click "Newest Topics" and see everything new in the subjects they've chosen.
Yupper. Agree. I have found the extra work around. But, what was wrong with the old format & why did it need to be changed?
whatdat wrote:
Yupper. Agree. I have found the extra work around. But, what was wrong with the old format & why did it need to be changed?
You still haven't read Admin's topic on why he made the changes?
Linda From Maine wrote:
You still haven't read Admin's topic on why he made the changes?
I did; but, I still don't see how it makes using UHH better.
jaymatt wrote:
The new format stinks to high heaven! At least there's a workaround that takes extra steps. Change for the sake of change is worthless.
Admin posted his reasons for the change. It wasn't change for the sake of change.
jaymatt wrote:
It was in my opinion.
There are, of course, other opinions….🙂
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.