iPhone 14 Pro Max 3:4 Vs. Full Frame 2:3 Ratios
Sep 15, 2023 16:39:23 #
Background
I have Many GB of 2:3 Full Frame pics saved.
I always shoot loose, perform my post-processing (PP), and then save my files so that in the future I may re-crop the now completed (post-processed) file to (almost) any ratio that I may prefer.
Now I have added iPhone 3:4 pics to my mix of processed files.
Also, when I process using Topaz Photo AI the completed files are of similar size to files obtained using my Canon R5 or RP.
My question is, do you segregate the two (3:4 vs. 2:3) ratios of files, or do you freely mix them?
What are some of the problems you have encountered with either method?
Remember the question is strictly about the ratios of the pic files and not about the serial numbers of the files.
Any reasonable suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Currently, I use the Year-Month-Day Description (2023-09-15 Jim's Big Adventure) format.
Thanks For The Help,
JimmyT Sends
I have Many GB of 2:3 Full Frame pics saved.
I always shoot loose, perform my post-processing (PP), and then save my files so that in the future I may re-crop the now completed (post-processed) file to (almost) any ratio that I may prefer.
Now I have added iPhone 3:4 pics to my mix of processed files.
Also, when I process using Topaz Photo AI the completed files are of similar size to files obtained using my Canon R5 or RP.
My question is, do you segregate the two (3:4 vs. 2:3) ratios of files, or do you freely mix them?
What are some of the problems you have encountered with either method?
Remember the question is strictly about the ratios of the pic files and not about the serial numbers of the files.
Any reasonable suggestions will be greatly appreciated.
Currently, I use the Year-Month-Day Description (2023-09-15 Jim's Big Adventure) format.
Thanks For The Help,
JimmyT Sends
Sep 15, 2023 17:26:21 #
I file by subject, no matter what <ratio> camera native format, in the same directory.
No segregation of format (or camera).
I'm more interested in the picture than what format.
Explorer can sort on dimensions or camera in the EXIF data.
(I have 3:2, 4:3, and phone{don't know ratio off-hand}.)
No segregation of format (or camera).
I'm more interested in the picture than what format.
Explorer can sort on dimensions or camera in the EXIF data.
(I have 3:2, 4:3, and phone{don't know ratio off-hand}.)
Sep 16, 2023 08:43:05 #
Chadp
Loc: Virginia Beach
I file by event, independently of ratio. Although that typically makes each event mostly one or the other. That is because my indoor events are usually full frame 2:3 when I need the better light performance. Then my 4:3 is usually travel, hiking, boating or most other outdoor activities taken by my Olympus m4/3 or iPhone. Also, about half of my 2:3 get cropped to 4:3 as I find that format more suitable for sharing online.
Sep 16, 2023 08:47:12 #
Chadp wrote:
...Also, about half of my 2:3 get cropped to 4:3 as I find that format more suitable for sharing online.
Interesting, why are they more suitable for online?
Sep 16, 2023 09:31:06 #
Chadp
Loc: Virginia Beach
Longshadow wrote:
Interesting, why are they more suitable for online?
Most people view shared online photos on their phone and in the vertical phone position. 4:3 fits better on the phone screen.
Sep 16, 2023 10:04:19 #
Chadp wrote:
Most people view shared online photos on their phone and in the vertical phone position. 4:3 fits better on the phone screen.
Ahh.
Thanks.
Never thought about that.
(If I did it for 3:2, it goes as 3:2. I've no idea what someone might be viewing on and I'm not gonna make two sets of images in different formats, just in case.)
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.