Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Zoom lens question
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Sep 15, 2023 11:21:24   #
SewClever
 
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my favorite walk around lens is the Nikkor 18-200mm. Recently it began slipping. I now use a band on it, but I just don't feel the photos are as sharp arls they once were. I know with a long zoom sharpness is often compromised, and I have several other lenses that do an excellent job. But as an almost 72 yr old woman, although spry enough, sometimes I just want to grab one lens for a long hike. I'm looking between Nikkor, Tamron, and Sigma. I want new, as I don't want to deal with slipping again any time soon. I'm looking at 18mm-300mm, or even 400mm is quality isn't terribly compromised. And suggestions from personal experience? Thank you!!

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 11:25:16   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
SewClever wrote:
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my favorite walk around lens is the Nikkor 18-200mm. Recently it began slipping. I now use a band on it, but I just don't feel the photos are as sharp arls they once were. I know with a long zoom sharpness is often compromised, and I have several other lenses that do an excellent job. But as an almost 72 yr old woman, although spry enough, sometimes I just want to grab one lens for a long hike. I'm looking between Nikkor, Tamron, and Sigma. I want new, as I don't want to deal with slipping again any time soon. I'm looking at 18mm-300mm, or even 400mm is quality isn't terribly compromised. And suggestions from personal experience? Thank you!!
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my fa... (show quote)


Do you honestly need, will use 300mm or 400mm? I can't say for the 300mm but the 400mm will most likely be very heavy for you to use and might be of limited use for you to begin with. If the 18-200 is presently working for you may I suggest you stay within that range of zoom power. Most all of the brand names you mentioned have some quality lenses. Now to just find one in your price range.

Dennis

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 11:29:33   #
SewClever
 
Thank you for your thoughts!

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2023 12:08:49   #
kcooke Loc: Alabama
 
My wife uses a D7200 with the 24-120 f4 Nikkor lens most of the time. The lens started having a few issues and we just decided to send it to Nikon for repair. They get the lens and quote the cost. Then you accept or not the repair and charges. They did a great job getting her lens back to like condition. Just mentioning this because it is an option if you like the lens

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 12:10:08   #
ELNikkor
 
Something a little more tidy and sharp is the DX 18-140. My friend had one and loved it! If you really might need longer, as a companion to the 18-140, Nikon also has a DX 70-300P lens that weighs less than a pound.

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 12:12:27   #
SewClever
 
kcooke wrote:
My wife uses a D7200 with the 24-120 f4 Nikkor lens most of the time. The lens started having a few issues and we just decided to send it to Nikon for repair. They get the lens and quote the cost. Then you accept or not the repair and charges. They did a great job getting her lens back to like condition. Just mentioning this because it is an option if you like the lens


Thank you! I never thought about that option!!

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 12:36:58   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
SewClever wrote:
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my favorite walk around lens is the Nikkor 18-200mm. Recently it began slipping. I now use a band on it, but I just don't feel the photos are as sharp arls they once were. I know with a long zoom sharpness is often compromised, and I have several other lenses that do an excellent job. But as an almost 72 yr old woman, although spry enough, sometimes I just want to grab one lens for a long hike. I'm looking between Nikkor, Tamron, and Sigma. I want new, as I don't want to deal with slipping again any time soon. I'm looking at 18mm-300mm, or even 400mm is quality isn't terribly compromised. And suggestions from personal experience? Thank you!!
Hi friends, I have Nikons d7200 and d500 and my fa... (show quote)


If you really like the 18-200 - which is a very good range on APSC, it is worth saving or replacing. I recommend doing a micro-focus adjust with both bodies and servicing the lens - or get another GOOD used/new one.
.

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2023 12:53:44   #
SewClever
 
imagemeister wrote:
If you really like the 18-200 - which is a very good range on APSC, it is worth saving or replacing. I recommend doing a micro-focus adjust with both bodies and servicing the lens - or get another GOOD used/new one.
.


Thank you. I think I'll try to have it serviced.

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 13:00:29   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
SewClever wrote:
Thank you. I think I'll try to have it serviced.


Please let us know your results. Even the second version of the 18-200 zoom has been discontinued for quite some time. I have one like yours that needs internal repair...the end of the ribbon cable has become disconnected...but I can't find anyone interested in even looking at it.

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 13:17:45   #
SewClever
 
I will post my results on this thread!

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 13:29:20   #
User ID
 
kcooke wrote:
My wife uses a D7200 with the 24-120 f4 Nikkor lens most of the time. The lens started having a few issues and we just decided to send it to Nikon for repair. They get the lens and quote the cost. Then you accept or not the repair and charges. They did a great job getting her lens back to like condition. Just mentioning this because it is an option if you like the lens

The 24-120/4 is heavy but the reward, and reason for the weight, is its significant wide angle ability. That applies only to use on FF bodies. Using it on an APSC body does not seem to address the OPs concerns at all.

Reply
 
 
Sep 15, 2023 13:32:00   #
coolhanduke Loc: Redondo Beach, CA
 
Have you considered sending it to Nikon to get fixed? Probably cheaper than a new lens.

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 14:11:56   #
wetreed
 
You should go with the Tamron 18-400

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 14:24:35   #
larryepage Loc: North Texas area
 
User ID wrote:
The 24-120/4 is heavy but the reward, and reason for the weight, is its significant wide angle ability. That applies only to use on FF bodies. Using it on an APSC body does not seem to address the OPs concerns at all.


For close to 15 years, I used the 17-55mm f/2.8 as the default lens on three different DX cameras...D200, D300, and D500. It's a pretty great lens, but it is fairly heavy, it doesn't have VR, and it can be a little short sometimes. I made a trip to my local camera store to see what alternatives might be available.

The 16-80mm f/2.8-4 came up first. Somehow, it just seemed too mediocre, too expensive, and too slow, since it turned out to be an f/4 lens from about 28mm and up.

There was a nice 24-120mm f/4 in the used case, however, priced at $425. I tried it and really liked it on my D500. You are correct that it isn't really very wide on a DX camera at pretty close to 35mm full frame equivalent. But it approaches 200mm full-frame equivalent on the long end. That has proven to be a pretty fair trade. It has become my preferred lens when using a DX camera.

If I know I'm going into a wide angle situation, I'll either swap over to a full frame camera or go back to the 17-55. If caught by surprise, a quick 2-4 shot panorama will fill the need at the expense of only a few extra seconds.

This thinking and approach may not work for everyone, but it's been pretty successful for me.

Reply
Sep 15, 2023 14:31:39   #
SewClever
 
larryepage wrote:
For close to 15 years, I used the 17-55mm f/2.8 as the default lens on three different DX cameras...D200, D300, and D500. It's a pretty great lens, but it is fairly heavy, it doesn't have VR, and it can be a little short sometimes. I made a trip to my local camera store to see what alternatives might be available.

The 16-80mm f/2.8-4 came up first. Somehow, it just seemed too mediocre, too expensive, and too slow, since it turned out to be an f/4 lens from about 28mm and up.

There was a nice 24-120mm f/4 in the used case, however, priced at $425. I tried it and really liked it on my D500. You are correct that it isn't really very wide on a DX camera at pretty close to 35mm full frame equivalent. But it approaches 200mm full-frame equivalent on the long end. That has proven to be a pretty fair trade. It has become my preferred lens when using a DX camera.

If I know I'm going into a wide angle situation, I'll either swap over to a full frame camera or go back to the 17-55. If caught by surprise, a quick 2-4 shot panorama will fill the need at the expense of only a few extra seconds.

This thinking and approach may not work for everyone, but it's been pretty successful for me.
For close to 15 years, I used the 17-55mm f/2.8 as... (show quote)


Thank you for your experience and thoughts!

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.