List Of Impeachment Charges Against Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr: Feel free to add any or dispute any. 1) Creating the most extensive voter fraud organization in American political...

The Aardvark Is Ready

Feel free to add any or dispute any.

1) Creating the most extensive voter fraud organization in American political history
2) Violations of the Espionage Act
3) Stealing classified documents from a SCIF
4) Illegal possession of classified documents
5) Assisting his son in violating FARA
6) War crimes in Ukraine
7) Bribery
8) 1st Amendment violations
9) Children in cages
10) Paying ransom money to Iran
11) Swapping a basketball player for an arms dealer and terrorist
12) Violating his oath of office allowing the southern invasion
13) Leaking classified information to his son, Hunter
14) Lying to the American people about his involvement in his son'e business dealings
15) Rape
16) Sexual assault
17) Pedophilia
18) I would include the botched Afghanistan withdrawal but that's just stupid incompetence, not impeachable

Triple G

The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:

Feel free to add any or dispute any. br br 1) Cre... (show quote)

Lists are meaningless and yours is ludicrous and will result in nothing unless there is evidence. The "inquiry" is a tactic to develop evidence not follow evidence already in hand.

Until the House votes on an actual impeachment proceeding, it's nothing but revenge politics and political posturing and pandering.

Republicans have yet to produce solid evidence the president engaged in any illegal conduct or financially benefited from his son’s deals.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2023/09/12/house-gop-launching-impeachment-inquiry-into-joe-biden-mccarthy-says/?sh=4588c6e2782f

The Aardvark Is Ready

Triple G wrote:

Lists are meaningless and will result in nothing unless there is evidence. The "inquiry" is a tactic to develop evidence not follow evidence already in hand.

Until the House votes on an actual impeachment proceeding, it's nothing but revenge politics and political posturing and pandering.

Don't like it when the shoe's on the other foot ,huh? Just playing by your rules. Democrats were saying they were going to impeach Trump before he was even elected. When you do it, you're just doing your patriotic duty, when there are actual crimes by Biden, it's "revenge." Well, sometimes revenge is sweet.

The Aardvark Is Ready

Triple G wrote:

Lists are meaningless and yours is ludicrous and w... (show quote)

In case you didn't know the president himself doesn't have to benefit financially for it to be a crime.

Triple G

The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:

Don't like it when the shoe's on the other foot ,huh? Just playing by your rules. Democrats were saying they were going to impeach Trump before he was even elected. When you do it, you're just doing your patriotic duty, when there are actual crimes by Biden, it's "revenge." Well, sometimes revenge is sweet.

Enjoy your juvenile pandering in the same vein as "lock her up" that will result with the same outcome.
Meanwhile, the democrat adults in Congress will counter the GOP funding standoff and actually get some meaningful work done.

It does not bother me that you're going after Biden except that it is a piss poor use of House time and taxpayer money. You voted in the yahoos, you should get the political performance you hoped for. If you think sweet revenge is appropriate, then enjoy to your heart's content.

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/congress/2023/09/after-a-summer-break-congress-has-a-lot-on-its-plate-this-fall/?readmore=1

Triple G

The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:

In case you didn't know the president himself doesn't have to benefit financially for it to be a crime.

Produce some actual evidence!

skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA

Triple G wrote:

Produce some actual evidence!

Do you mean the “evidence” that Schiff told the American public he had that no one ever saw even though it was the ‘basis’ for two failed impeachments and wasted months and millions of the country’s time and money? That “evidence”?

Triple G

skylane5sp wrote:

Do you mean the “evidence” that Schiff told the American public he had that no one ever saw even though it was the ‘basis’ for two failed impeachments and wasted months and millions of the country’s time and money? That “evidence”?

Yes, sufficient evidence!

Followed by 1/6 Committee and Federal indictments!

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/dec/18/january-6-panel-schiff-evidence-criminally-charge-trump-efforts-overturn-2020-election

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

skylane5sp wrote:

Do you mean the “evidence” that Schiff told the American public he had that no one ever saw even though it was the ‘basis’ for two failed impeachments and wasted months and millions of the country’s time and money? That “evidence”?

Come on!

BOTH impeachments were blocked by the GOP. That does not make them a failure. That simply means the GOP was afraid to hear the evidence... whether or not Schiff had any.

The Aardvark Is Ready

BooIsMyCat wrote:

Come on!

BOTH impeachments were blocked by the GOP. That does not make them a failure. That simply means the GOP was afraid to hear the evidence... whether or not Schiff had any.

Come on!
This impeachment will be blocked by the DEMS. That does not mean it will be a failure. That simply means the DEMS will be afraid to hear the evidence.

BooIsMyCat Loc: Somewhere

The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:

Feel free to add any or dispute any. br br 1) Cre... (show quote)

Your own fuhrer messed up chances for a Biden impeachment. He changed the rules so that a full House vote is required. You and the other extremists in DC don't have those votes.

Face it, your party is imploding and trying very hard to take democracy down with it.

The Aardvark Is Ready

Triple G wrote:

Enjoy your juvenile pandering in the same vein as ... (show quote)

I love it when you guys bring up "lock her up." The fact she wasn't was because Trump didn't go after his poliical enemies like the DemonRats do. He could have gotten his DOJ to appoint a SP, but didn't.
And going after Trump was not a piss poor use of House time and taxpayer money when it was a foregone conclusion that neither would result in conviction?????? Especially egregious was the second waste of taxpayer money on the 2nd one cause Trump was out of office. If that wasn't revenge I don't know what is.
The hypocrisy runs deep.
And yes, I will enjoy the revenge to my heart's content.

Triple G

The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:

I love it when you guys bring up "lock her up." The fact she wasn't was because Trump didn't go after his poliical enemies like the DemonRats do. He could have gotten his DOJ to appoint a SP, but didn't.
And going after Trump was not a piss poor use of House time and taxpayer money when it was a foregone conclusion that neither would result in conviction??????
The hypocrisy runs deep.
And yes, I will enjoy the revenge to my heart's content.

It got the investigations going which resulted in indictments. That's a good thing.

Good for you--enjoy before your bubble bursts AGAIN!

The Aardvark Is Ready

Triple G wrote:

Good for you!

What about the rest of my comment? Any comebacks?

Triple G

The Aardvark Is Ready wrote:

What about the rest of my comment? Any comebacks?

Just for you, I added more!