DennyT wrote:
Yes I never took issue with hus firing did I mr mouth.?
BUT There was no burisma investigation involved .
"hus firing?" ????? By the way, you do not need a period AND a question mark. A question mark would have sufficed nicely. You DO need a comma after the letter, I, as in, did I, Mr. mouth. Stick with me lil denny. We'll have you writing legibly in no time. There are a couple more issues but I don't want to nag you repeatedly. Let's take baby steps.
Perhaps you should have taken issue because, and once AGAIN, I ask you, does it really make sense, either ethically, common sense wise or anything else for America to hold back a Billion dollar payment to another country based upon the firing or not of one person, in this case a prosecutor. AGAIN, can you even imagine another country telling America, we will do this IF you will fire a federal prosecutor in some part of your country? Would that not be a RED FLAG that something was very WRONG, something about that prosecutor must be affecting the Biden Family or some family for that country, Ukraine, to be forced to fire one of their prosecutors. Are you honestly not capable of grasping the meaning of the prosecutor HAVING to be terminated?
As has been pointed out, the State Department had no problem making the payment. It was Joe Biden who insisted the prosecutor be fired. Did you happen to catch that point?
Maybe IF you can shed your ultra thin skin and pay attention to what is really going on, what really happened you might learn something important. Maybe important enough for you to see and understand Joe Biden has always been one corrupt SOB for the last 50 years in politics.
Dennis
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
dennis2146 wrote:
"hus firing?" ????? By the way, you do not need a period AND a question mark. A question mark would have sufficed nicely. You DO need a comma after the letter, I, as in, did I, Mr. mouth. Stick with me lil denny. We'll have you writing legibly in no time. There are a couple more issues but I don't want to nag you repeatedly. Let's take baby steps.
Perhaps you should have taken issue because, and once AGAIN, I ask you, does it really make sense, either ethically, common sense wise or anything else for America to hold back a Billion dollar payment to another country based upon the firing or not of one person, in this case a prosecutor. AGAIN, can you even imagine another country telling America, we will do this IF you will fire a federal prosecutor in some part of your country? Would that not be a RED FLAG that something was very WRONG, something about that prosecutor must be affecting the Biden Family or some family for that country, Ukraine, to be forced to fire one of their prosecutors. Are you honestly not capable of grasping the meaning of the prosecutor HAVING to be terminated?
As has been pointed out, the State Department had no problem making the payment. It was Joe Biden who insisted the prosecutor be fired. Did you happen to catch that point?
Maybe IF you can shed your ultra thin skin and pay attention to what is really going on, what really happened you might learn something important. Maybe important enough for you to see and understand Joe Biden has always been one corrupt SOB for the last 50 years in politics.
Dennis
"hus firing?" ????? By the way, you do... (
show quote)
For the second time . At the time biden told Ukraine to fire the prosecutor there was no investigation of burisma going on.
Ref the state department comment . I have only see a newspaper article and never the memo - have you.?
DennyT wrote:
For the second time . At the time biden told Ukraine to fire the prosecutor there was no investigation of burisma going on.
Ref the state department comment . I have only see a newspaper article and never the memo - have you.?
So you are suggesting that Shokin never opened an investigation into Burisma? Is that what you are saying?
You know you always buy into the left's lies.... Please read and explain this, you know the left's narrative, that the administration thought Shokin was corrupt and wanted him gone, well the fact is that it was Biden and Biden alone who demanded his firing, the Obama administration had already expressed confidence in Shokin.
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-08/NulandtoShokinJune2015.pdf
DennyT wrote:
For the second time . At the time biden told Ukraine to fire the prosecutor there was no investigation of burisma going on.
Ref the state department comment . I have only see a newspaper article and never the memo - have you.?
YES!!!!!! I GET it lil denny. I know that is what you are fixated on, what you are trying to tell us/ME. But for my second or third time now, Hell, how long does it take for you to open the door to your mind, WHY ELSE would America, you know, the HUGE country you live in, give a shit about one (1) federal investigator in the country of Ukraine.
Do you GET it? Can you honestly come up with one solid reason, Joe Biden, Vice President, of America, give a shit about just one federal prosecutor in another country, ANY other country? Isn't THAT the point we all should be considering and yet you, for some reason, seem fixated on the notion Biden was well within his rights to insist/demand that prosecutor be fired from his job. Now if not because of Burisma then WHY? Is that too hard a question for you?
Did you miss the important part of the State Department had already signed off on the money being given to Ukraine? Why on earth was Joe Biden raising a stink at all about the prosecutor when the rest of American politics apparently did not care about this one man?
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
YES!!!!!! I GET it lil denny. I know that is what you are fixated on, what you are trying to tell us/ME. But for my second or third time now, Hell, how long does it take for you to open the door to your mind, WHY ELSE would America, you know, the HUGE country you live in, give a shit about one (1) federal investigator in the country of Ukraine.
Do you GET it? Can you honestly come up with one solid reason, Joe Biden, Vice President, of America, give a shit about just one federal prosecutor in another country, ANY other country? Isn't THAT the point we all should be considering and yet you, for some reason, seem fixated on the notion Biden was well within his rights to insist/demand that prosecutor be fired from his job. Now if not because of Burisma then WHY? Is that too hard a question for you?
Did you miss the important part of the State Department had already signed off on the money being given to Ukraine? Why on earth was Joe Biden raising a stink at all about the prosecutor when the rest of American politics apparently did not care about this one man?
Dennis
YES!!!!!! I GET it lil denny. I know that is wha... (
show quote)
Devon Archer has recently stated that Burisma considered Shokin a threat and had pressured Hunter to have DC do something about it. Of course this means nothing to our "Conservative" Denny.
Blurryeyed wrote:
Devon Archer has recently stated that Burisma considered Shokin a threat and had pressured Hunter to have DC do something about it. Of course this means nothing to our "Conservative" Denny.
I had not heard that but it makes perfect sense. There MUST have been some reason ONLY Joe Biden would want that particular prosecutor fired from his job. lil denny naturally assumes everything he reads that supports his Left Wing dreams must be true. People with open minds along with common sense know better than that.
Thank you for the assist.
Dennis
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
DennyT wrote:
Yes he did . I never said he didn’t. I said there was no investigation of the sort at time he was fired. It end around a year before .
Is that memo in question.
I read it to say keep up effort to get rid of corruption . In fact attention they tense and you will note it says you have lots to do yet.
I see nothing about releasing funds. Do you ?
Facts count
OK, so you apparently cannot seem to get your mind around the prosecutor coming BACK for another investigation into Hunter Biden and Burisma? Is that really too farfetched for your mind to ponder? REALLY???
Please lil denny, what does, "In fact attention they tense and you will note it says you have lots to do yet.", even mean? Could you please translate that for me.
You STILL have not told any of us why ONLY Joe Biden was wanting the prosecutor fired. But you sure are fired up about the termination NOT having anything to do with Hunter Biden. Damn if you might not be the strongest supporter of the Democratic Socialist Party in The Attic. Congratulations. Have you already received your secret decoder ring from Chairman Biden? Was it a White House ceremony? Pretty impressive.
Dennis
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
dennis2146 wrote:
Please lil denny, what does, "In fact attention they tense and you will note it says you have lots to do yet.", even mean? Could you please translate that for me.
Dennis
I think he was quoting the chairman of the Biden Crime family, making a comment to the media.
travelwp wrote:
I think he was quoting the chairman of the Biden Crime family, making a comment to the media.
Your guess with lil denny's posts is as good as mine. Who knows?
Dennis
Well DAMN!!!!!
That is pretty telling, isn't it? Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevsky paid the Biden family millions to fire Shokin after Shokin seized property from Zlochevsky.
I can't but wonder if lil denny saw that report.
Dennis
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
dennis2146 wrote:
Well DAMN!!!!!
That is pretty telling, isn't it? Burisma owner Nikolai Zlochevsky paid the Biden family millions to fire Shokin after Shokin seized property from Zlochevsky.
I can't but wonder if lil denny saw that report.
Dennis
Where is the proof of that claim ?
I will wait patiently
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.