Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Reload of some images to allow download
Aug 17, 2023 08:23:21 #
I thought that I had checked the correct box. both of these, I checked store original and hit add attachment. what went wrong?
I did check store original.
I did check store original.
Aug 17, 2023 10:39:47 #
Wrong format? Image too large (I think there's a size limit to uploaded images).
Aug 17, 2023 10:47:37 #
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Aug 17, 2023 10:54:15 #
toxdoc42 wrote:
I thought that I had checked the correct box. both of these, I checked store original and hit add attachment. what went wrong?
I did check store original.
I did check store original.
ToxDoc:
Thhis has happened to me. Rather quikly traced the problem to having too small a pixel size. If you upload an image that UHH considers too small to download, UHH simply disables the Download option.
- JimT
Aug 17, 2023 11:23:05 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
toxdoc42 wrote:
I thought that I had checked the correct box. both of these, I checked store original and hit add attachment. what went wrong?
I did check store original.
I did check store original.
I don't know but I love the photos!
Aug 17, 2023 11:44:10 #
Aug 17, 2023 12:07:23 #
RogStrix
Loc: UK
toxdoc42 wrote:
Thanks, will try increasing pixels, strangely my scanner is set for 300 dpi.
File size will also depend on how much compression your jpeg/scanner is set to?
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Aug 17, 2023 12:34:35 #
Aug 17, 2023 13:11:10 #
I decided to try megapixel, interesting what it does to the image, not sure I like, i will rescan later.
Aug 18, 2023 08:47:11 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
toxdoc42 wrote:
I decided to try megapixel, interesting what it does to the image, not sure I like, i will rescan later.
Some weird artifacts and stuff going on with the downloadable ones. I assume megapixel is adding them only because you mentioned it, not something I would guess on my own .
What is the original? Are they RGB or greyscale? Send the specs, size in pixel ( resolution - even though pixels will tell us) , mode, depth (16 bit?) .... format etc. See if we can spot the issue from there.
In the past, I have attached layered PSD files whose image did not show up with a preview, but the files themselves were there. All that appeared on the UglyHog post was the (download) line. Those with Photoshop or on a desktop etc. that could preview .psd files, could click on and in the window that opened, could view them, and if downloaded, the PSD file layers and adjustments showed up intact.
Aug 18, 2023 10:04:35 #
Yes Megapixel adds artifact. I assume its algorithm thinks they should be there.
The original were/was B & W negatives. I scanned them with an epson scanner at 600 dpi. It was set for B & W negatives. I long ago lost the correct negative adapter, so use the transparency adapter, so had to crop the image, which ended up then at 811X396 for only 65.2 kb
I hope to find the time later, to increase the scanning resolution to see if i can get higher resolution scans.
Of interest, if I leave the Epson, Perfection 1620, plugged in, the software, VueScan X64 does not load. I have to load the program, then plug in the scanner in order to choose that scanner rather than use my Brother printer-copier-scanner.
The original were/was B & W negatives. I scanned them with an epson scanner at 600 dpi. It was set for B & W negatives. I long ago lost the correct negative adapter, so use the transparency adapter, so had to crop the image, which ended up then at 811X396 for only 65.2 kb
I hope to find the time later, to increase the scanning resolution to see if i can get higher resolution scans.
Of interest, if I leave the Epson, Perfection 1620, plugged in, the software, VueScan X64 does not load. I have to load the program, then plug in the scanner in order to choose that scanner rather than use my Brother printer-copier-scanner.
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Aug 18, 2023 11:59:15 #
RogStrix
Loc: UK
toxdoc42 wrote:
Yes Megapixel adds artifact. I assume its algorithm thinks they should be there.
The original were/was B & W negatives. I scanned them with an epson scanner at 600 dpi. It was set for B & W negatives. I long ago lost the correct negative adapter, so use the transparency adapter, so had to crop the image, which ended up then at 811X396 for only 65.2 kb
The original were/was B & W negatives. I scanned them with an epson scanner at 600 dpi. It was set for B & W negatives. I long ago lost the correct negative adapter, so use the transparency adapter, so had to crop the image, which ended up then at 811X396 for only 65.2 kb
Just for reference the Nikon Coolscan V operates at 4000dpi so at only 600dpi you are a bit optimistic?
Aug 18, 2023 12:02:03 #
Aug 18, 2023 16:29:18 #
TD:
The image that you think is misbehaving is 811 pixels wide. UHH needs a minimum of 1201 pixels width to work. Has nothing to do with megapixel size or greyscale or color. 1201 pixel ( or more ) width and they will work as you expect.
- JimT
The image that you think is misbehaving is 811 pixels wide. UHH needs a minimum of 1201 pixels width to work. Has nothing to do with megapixel size or greyscale or color. 1201 pixel ( or more ) width and they will work as you expect.
- JimT
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.