Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Presidential Aircraft June 20th 2023
Jul 10, 2023 17:03:11   #
marine73 Loc: Modesto California
 
The president made a visit to California the week of June 19th. These photos were taken on the 20th with a iPhone 12 max pro. As can be seen I was able to get pretty close. With the Ospreys there were always two in the air in the vicinity of the airport providing security for airfare one along with a ground team that was providing preimeter security. Hope you enjoy. I meant to put these in the smart phone photography section but had a brain fart instead.

MV22 Osprey taxing for take-off
MV22 Osprey taxing for take-off...
(Download)

MV22 Osprey taxing for take-off in front of the van that I was riding in
MV22 Osprey taxing for take-off in front of the va...
(Download)

Second MV22 Osprey preparing for taxi
Second MV22 Osprey preparing for taxi...
(Download)

Airforce one as seen from road on the AOA (Airport Operations Area)
Airforce one as seen from road on the AOA (Airport...
(Download)

Airforce one as seen from the ramp area in front of my company hangers. Our hanger doors had to be completely shut when they departed.
Airforce one as seen from the ramp area in front o...
(Download)

Reply
Jul 10, 2023 20:46:07   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
Beautiful shots of cool airplanes. I wonder how many Marines the Osprey has killed in its career?

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 05:42:50   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
The Osprey is an interesting helicopter. I would like to pilot her but I still working on my single prop rating. At this rate, I’ll be 245 years old when I get that rating.

There are two things about people learning to pilot a plane.
You either have plenty of time to learn but no money to take lessons OR plenty of money to learn but no time to to take lessons.

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2023 07:41:00   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
What a plane! It's like something that appeared in a designer's dream, and he actually went ahead and built one.

"I bet you couldn't build a plane like this." "Oh, yeah? Watch me!"

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 09:10:00   #
DougS Loc: Central Arkansas
 
Very interesting set!

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 09:29:21   #
flyguy Loc: Las Cruces, New Mexico
 
Great shots!

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 09:35:14   #
Bloke Loc: Waynesboro, Pennsylvania
 
Interesting thing about Air Force One... When it comes time to retire the 747, there is some sort of law which states that the President's official aircraft must be 4-engined. I guess for redundancy and safety reasons. Thing is, nobody is building 4-engine planes anymore...

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2023 09:52:45   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Bloke wrote:
Interesting thing about Air Force One... When it comes time to retire the 747, there is some sort of law which states that the President's official aircraft must be 4-engined. I guess for redundancy and safety reasons. Thing is, nobody is building 4-engine planes anymore...


Yes, and that's going to be a problem. The 747 is the only one close to being possible. The ones being built now were originally ordered for Russia, I think, so Boeing didn't have to build them. Planes can fly on one engine but not for long distances or long periods of time, especially a plane like Air Force One. Boeing is having so much trouble converting it that it will be a long time before it's ready.

Maybe Airbus could build an A380.

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 10:06:40   #
DJphoto Loc: SF Bay Area
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Yes, and that's going to be a problem. The 747 is the only one close to being possible. The ones being built now were originally ordered for Russia, I think, so Boeing didn't have to build them. Planes can fly on one engine but not for long distances or long periods of time, especially a plane like Air Force One. Boeing is having so much trouble converting it that it will be a long time before it's ready.

Maybe Airbus could build an A380.
Yes, and that's going to be a problem. The 747 is... (show quote)


I doubt that would be considered due to the fact that it's not made in America and thus long-term support can't be guaranteed, as well as it violating the "buy American" act. The new 747-8 presidential airplanes should be good for at least 25 years of service.

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 10:42:41   #
marine73 Loc: Modesto California
 
Scruples wrote:
The Osprey is an interesting helicopter. I would like to pilot her but I still working on my single prop rating. At this rate, I’ll be 245 years old when I get that rating.

There are two things about people learning to pilot a plane.
You either have plenty of time to learn but no money to take lessons OR plenty of money to learn but no time to to take lessons.


I was in the first part and it still took me 30 tears to get my single engine license.

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 11:35:14   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
I live about 2 air miles from Trump National Golf Course in Bedminster, NJ. When he occupied the White House, he made frequent trips to the course. I never had to read accounts of his arrival. The huge decibel levels of the helicopters overhead always announced his arrival.
Mark

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2023 11:39:56   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
Scruples wrote:
The Osprey is an interesting helicopter. I would like to pilot her but I still working on my single prop rating. At this rate, I’ll be 245 years old when I get that rating.

There are two things about people learning to pilot a plane.
You either have plenty of time to learn but no money to take lessons OR plenty of money to learn but no time to to take lessons.


Times have certainly changed. A h.s. friend of mine, now a retired airline pilot, earned money for flying lessons in high school by mowing yards. You couldn't do that today.

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 12:42:39   #
Gundog Loc: Beaufort, SC
 
Retired Marine officer here. No more than any other new aircraft. I remember when CH-53Es came into service. They were falling out of the sky like leaves in October. Aircraft manufacturers have so much political clout they are not held accountable for obvious and know mechanical and/or design flaws. If fact, make lots of money fixing problems that should never been problems. The 22 is a good aircraft, but yes, too many military lives(Air Force and Navy have variants) will be lost before the bugs are worked out. Bugs that the manufacturers let through so they could make more money. IMHO

Reply
Jul 11, 2023 13:13:17   #
DJphoto Loc: SF Bay Area
 
Gundog wrote:
Retired Marine officer here. No more than any other new aircraft. I remember when CH-53Es came into service. They were falling out of the sky like leaves in October. Aircraft manufacturers have so much political clout they are not held accountable for obvious and know mechanical and/or design flaws. If fact, make lots of money fixing problems that should never been problems. The 22 is a good aircraft, but yes, too many military lives(Air Force and Navy have variants) will be lost before the bugs are worked out. Bugs that the manufacturers let through so they could make more money. IMHO
Retired Marine officer here. No more than any othe... (show quote)


Thank you for your service Gundog. The V-22 is arguably the most complex aircraft the military has ever operated and has some flight characteristics that are different from any other aircraft. It also has capabilities that no other military aircraft has. One issue that resulted in some early mishaps was entering into ring state vortex at a higher than authorized descent rate, something that is an issue with all rotary wing aircraft. However, the V-22 appears to be more susceptible to it due to it's higher disc loading. While not a V-22 expert, I'm an aerospace engineer who spent the first 26 years of my career doing in-service engineering on Navy aircraft as a Navy civilian engineer, then the last 9 as a NASA engineer.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.