Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

So the far Lefty's were okay with Trump being indicted but not Hillary Clinton and they're protecting Joe Biden as well when it comes to classify documents possession. The Democrats always saying nobody's above the law, apparently that is not true when it comes to their side

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CtSJeLTO7Oc/?igshid=MTc4MmM1YmI2Ng==

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

You and your instagram crap. NO ORIGINAL THINKING REQUIRED. Pence also had some documents, but was cleared of wrongdoing. You're a typical Repuke Rac, guilty, guilty, guilty.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Lol so you totally deflect from the issue and can't answer it can you? Double standards with you lunatic lefties

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

I did answer your ignorant post.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

No you didn't you liar lol

'So why didn't the far Lefty's on here call for Hillary Clinton's indictment?"

Triple G

We leave that up to the justice department. They are the ones to do the investigation and criminal intent and behavior. They (including Barr and Durham) found nothing so the question is why should anyone call for her indictment?

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Lol You’re such a hypocrite. The far lefties have been calling for Trumps indictment for almost a year now for the classified documents yet none have EVER called for Hillary’s indictment. Lol double standards with you far Ledties.

davidrb Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel

Remember when Teddy The K gave driving lessons? Not one word from the hypocrites on the left.

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

Clinton's indictment for what? Rac, about all you are capable of is calling everyone a liar.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

<shakes head>

dlwhawaii Loc: Sunny Wailuku, Hawaii

Must make a lot of noise, rather like a BB in a boxcar. LOL.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

David Martin Loc: Cary, NC

As posted elsewhere, they did find something, but used their discretionary power to do nothing more than wag their finger and issue a muted "tsk tsk."

Triple G

No, they had to show intent of national security impact and believe they could get a grand jury to indict on what evidence they had on the democratic candidate for president. And, if they got indictments, they had to believe that they could get a jury to convict at "beyond reasonable doubt" level. They didn't believe they could meet those standards for Clinton. That same set of standards exist for Jack Smith and a grand jury agreed with charges and he must believe he can get a "beyond reasonable doubt" jury decision or he wouldn't have brought it. PS- Beyond possession, can you confirm an intent for Clinton? Or, even that any of the documents were "classified", much less any that were Top Secret?

David Martin Loc: Cary, NC

"110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification."

Clinton had her office deliberately delete emails prior to handing over to the FBI. Comey gave her the benefit of the doubt that this was an error and that she did not attempt to conceal anything. Lucky Hillary!

"With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level."

"None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail."

"... we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account." [emphasis added]

Again, Hillary was given a pass that she did not intend to break the rules and that she meant no harm.
It pays to have friends in high places, no?

All quotes are James Comey, July 5, 2016