How to capture the moon
Jun 3, 2023 12:16:04 #
dwmoar
Loc: Oregon, Willamette Valley
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
I'm laid up with back issues.
Need surgery
Need surgery
Bummer, am sorry to hear that.
Jun 3, 2023 13:24:51 #
Jun 4, 2023 16:08:06 #
Jun 4, 2023 17:10:21 #
as said many times above , set your camera to daylight settings.
my version of the moon, two pix, do u know why two pix????
my version of the moon, two pix, do u know why two pix????
Jun 4, 2023 17:32:47 #
dwmoar
Loc: Oregon, Willamette Valley
bdk wrote:
as said many times above , set your camera to daylight settings.
my version of the moon, two pix, do u know why two pix????
my version of the moon, two pix, do u know why two pix????
one for the moon and the other for the stars.
There is one little detail, Why are there star showing when the unlit part of the moon is? There should be no stars seen in that area.
Jun 4, 2023 17:50:28 #
Sidwalkastronomy
Loc: New Jersey Shore
bdk wrote:
as said many times above , set your camera to daylight settings.
my version of the moon, two pix, do u know why two pix????
my version of the moon, two pix, do u know why two pix????
One for noon one for stars
Don't see stars with moon out
Jun 4, 2023 17:51:56 #
Sidwalkastronomy
Loc: New Jersey Shore
We do astronomy one week on either side of new moon.
No reason for stars looks fske
No reason for stars looks fske
Jun 4, 2023 17:53:08 #
Sidwalkastronomy
Loc: New Jersey Shore
dwmoar wrote:
one for the moon and the other for the stars.
There is one little detail, Why are there star showing when the unlit part of the moon is? There should be no stars seen in that area.
There is one little detail, Why are there star showing when the unlit part of the moon is? There should be no stars seen in that area.
What unlit part of moon you referring too?
Jun 4, 2023 17:53:42 #
Sidwalkastronomy
Loc: New Jersey Shore
John Bastas wrote:
Shot with my Canon 80d and Sigma 100-400 handheld.
Colors are way off.
Jun 4, 2023 18:47:21 #
Jun 4, 2023 19:32:47 #
dwmoar
Loc: Oregon, Willamette Valley
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
What unlit part of moon you referring too?
The lower right hand corner. That image is of a Waning Gibbous Moon.
Jun 4, 2023 20:11:43 #
Jun 4, 2023 21:21:55 #
dwmoar
Loc: Oregon, Willamette Valley
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
Why did you superimpose stars on the moon photo?
If you were referring that question to me, I can't tell you why, as it is not my work.
bdk posted those images. I have to admit that it is interesting to see the moon as one might see it, if there was no light pollution. In film days they would of done such shots using double exposures.
On my Canon 70D camera, I can take multiple exposures, from 2-9 images and then let camera blend them into a single exposure.
Jun 5, 2023 07:27:28 #
Rhare wrote:
I can never capture the moon as it looks. Any suggestions?
Get on Ralph Kramden's bad side and you will see it up close.
Jun 5, 2023 09:18:51 #
Sidwalkastronomy
Loc: New Jersey Shore
Find my post and I went in great detail. PM if you have questions
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.