Another topic to get Biden elected again.
Another topic to get Biden elected again.
Headline: “8 dead, 9 injured after car runs into pedestrians in Brownsville, TX”
What we see in the video is that this SUV, a Range Rover, just ran the light that was about a hundred feet away and just drove through people who were sitting there in the bus stop,"
The liberal cry to eliminate the AR-15 should tell everyone that it’s not people who kill but it’s objects that kill, therefore the government should control or eliminate the Range Rover. Further, the capacity should be discussed, should the Range Rover be allowed to have eight cylinders or just six?
The liberal election mantra should be: “do Range Rovers really need 8 cylinders”
Presidental discussion: (would an electric Range Rover kill less people?)
travelwp wrote:
Another topic to get Biden elected again.
Headline: “8 dead, 9 injured after car runs into pedestrians in Brownsville, TX”
What we see in the video is that this SUV, a Range Rover, just ran the light that was about a hundred feet away and just drove through people who were sitting there in the bus stop,"
The liberal cry to eliminate the AR-15 should tell everyone that it’s not people who kill but it’s objects that kill, therefore the government should control or eliminate the Range Rover. Further, the capacity should be discussed, should the Range Rover be allowed to have eight cylinders or just six?
The liberal election mantra should be: “do Range Rovers really need 8 cylinders”
Presidental discussion: (would an electric Range Rover kill less people?)
Another topic to get Biden elected again. br br H... (
show quote)
All future automobiles should be powered electrically whether the means exist to charge them or not. Everyone knows that.
Alafoto wrote:
All future automobiles should be powered electrically whether the means exist to charge them or not. Everyone knows that.
would an electric Range Rover kill less people?
LDB415
Loc: Houston south suburb
travelwp wrote:
Another topic to get Biden elected again.
Headline: “8 dead, 9 injured after car runs into pedestrians in Brownsville, TX”
What we see in the video is that this SUV, a Range Rover, just ran the light that was about a hundred feet away and just drove through people who were sitting there in the bus stop,"
The liberal cry to eliminate the AR-15 should tell everyone that it’s not people who kill but it’s objects that kill, therefore the government should control or eliminate the Range Rover. Further, the capacity should be discussed, should the Range Rover be allowed to have eight cylinders or just six?
The liberal election mantra should be: “do Range Rovers really need 8 cylinders”
Presidental discussion: (would an electric Range Rover kill less people?)
Another topic to get Biden elected again. br br H... (
show quote)
Come on now. What is this half-a$$ stuff. We need a 4 cylinder limit. And none of these dangerous high-capacity fuel tanks. We need common sense. We need a 7 gallon fuel tank limit. Who needs more than 7 gallons? And we need mandatory blocking of everything but incoming telephone calls while phones are in a car, unless the car is in Park. Nothing less is acceptable for common sense and saving lives.
What a pitiful bunch of uninformed miscreants Republicans are.
If I need to explain the difference between cars and guns, there is no hope that you will ever understand.
travelwp wrote:
would an electric Range Rover kill less people?
No, but it would have no carbon footprint while doing so. Well, except for the carbon emissions of the plants providing the electricity to charge hem.
Frank T wrote:
What a pitiful bunch of uninformed miscreants Republicans are.
If I need to explain the difference between cars and guns, there is no hope that you will ever understand.
No one asked you to explain anything. You took that upon yourself.
Frank T wrote:
If I need to explain the difference between cars and guns, there is no hope that you will ever understand.
Again, you missed the point. Please explain the difference between a human being purposely killing other human beings with a gun and a human being purposely killing other human beings with a Range Rover.
travelwp wrote:
Another topic to get Biden elected again.
Headline: “8 dead, 9 injured after car runs into pedestrians in Brownsville, TX”
What we see in the video is that this SUV, a Range Rover, just ran the light that was about a hundred feet away and just drove through people who were sitting there in the bus stop,"
The liberal cry to eliminate the AR-15 should tell everyone that it’s not people who kill but it’s objects that kill, therefore the government should control or eliminate the Range Rover. Further, the capacity should be discussed, should the Range Rover be allowed to have eight cylinders or just six?
The liberal election mantra should be: “do Range Rovers really need 8 cylinders”
Presidental discussion: (would an electric Range Rover kill less people?)
Another topic to get Biden elected again. br br H... (
show quote)
What color was the Range Rover?
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
travelwp wrote:
Again, you missed the point. Please explain the difference between a human being purposely killing other human beings with a gun and a human being purposely killing other human beings with a Range Rover.
How many use car and how many use guns is the point!
DennyT wrote:
How many use car and how many use guns is the point!
All this time I thought it was about how many were dead.
Dead by guns, dead by abortion or dead by cars...... they are still dead.
If it's numbers that interests you, then read this: there are thousands killed by abortion and by comparison only a handful are killed with guns.
If you think a gun can leave a house and get into a car, and you think a gun can drive a car to a mall and a gun can shoot innocent people then you are surely thinking like a Biden voter.
(I used to use the word 'stupid', but 'Biden voter' is excepted more by most people)
LDB415
Loc: Houston south suburb
The left cares nothing about people and deaths and honest citizens' rights, only about what can further their agenda.
Alafoto wrote:
All future automobiles should be powered electrically whether the means exist to charge them or not. Everyone knows that.
Yep. Just like everyone knows we should not use fire of any kind to cook food, especially gas. This also means
no fire for heat in winter.
Also, everyone knows that no more than a quart of water (cold) water should be used for bathing and laundry.
Laundry should be done only with a tub and a washboard by hand. No detergent. Sand only.
It is common knowledge that the world will end in 10 years if we do not follow these rules.
I have a few ideas for where some plug-in charging stations could be installed.
travelwp wrote:
Again, you missed the point. Please explain the difference between a human being purposely killing other human beings with a gun and a human being purposely killing other human beings with a Range Rover.
Would it make a difference if the killer used a Dodge Ram?
davidrb
Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
Alafoto wrote:
All future automobiles should be powered electrically whether the means exist to charge them or not. Everyone knows that.
This bullshit attitude has been beaten around for more than 100 years! Just WHO ARE YOU to be making this crap up? ELECTRICITY is not a viable method of propulsion and EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT! Like dumocrats it CANNOT be controlled. When the Chief of Stupidity starts riding in an electric limousine and fliying in an electric powered airplane we will know electricity is of real value for transportation. He does not use electricity himself but demands his loyal subjects do? And YOU follow him like a lost guppy!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.