Tamron 150-600 lens vs. Nikon 200-500mm
Feb 13, 2023 11:08:14 #
Bob in SD
Loc: Sioux Falls, SD
I would really like to hear what your thoughts are regarding the Tamron 150-600 G2 lens vs the Nikon 150-500mm lens. I use a Nikon D850 for the camera. Will I get equal quality results with both lens, except the Nikon is only 500mm. I could add a converter to it if needed. Do most of you feel you get good results with converters or does the extra glass add to distortion?
I will use this primarily for wildlife, probably more birds than animals.
Thank you ahead of time for any of your thoughts as it is truly appreciated.
Bob
I will use this primarily for wildlife, probably more birds than animals.
Thank you ahead of time for any of your thoughts as it is truly appreciated.
Bob
Feb 13, 2023 11:24:56 #
SunBeach1962
Loc: Syrscuse, NY
Bob in SD wrote:
I would really like to hear what your thoughts are... (show quote)
I use a 1.4 extender on my Pf 500mm 5.6, it drops to 8 when I do. It is a great combination on my D500 DX camera, and my D780. The 1.4 gives the Pf of a 750mm
Feb 13, 2023 11:37:18 #
Feb 13, 2023 11:41:15 #
I have both lenses with their 1.4 TC's and use them with the D500 and 850. While the Tam has a little more reach, the Nikon typically acquires focus a little quicker and is better in lower light. There is not a great deal of image degradation with either and I usually use manual focus with them, so I don't use TC's for moving wildlife...thousands of shots in Yellowstone. My preference is the Nikon 600 f4 with a 1.7, which I have rented for a couple trips, but it is cheaper to remain married and I will not purchase one.
I should add that it is extremely rare for me to use a TC.
I should add that it is extremely rare for me to use a TC.
Feb 13, 2023 12:12:29 #
I have owned two Tamron long zooms and got rid of them. I have the 200~500 Nikon and love it! I have a couple shorter Tamrons that I like, but will never own another long one! I don't use T/Cs but I do use the 200~500 with a D500 for more "reach" sometimes. It works very well.
Feb 13, 2023 12:31:50 #
greenwork
Loc: Southwest Florida
I sold my Tamron, it never felt quite right. I've been happier with the the Nikon 200-500 I replaced it with on my D850. I haven't felt the need for more reach.
Feb 13, 2023 12:34:06 #
Bob in SD
Loc: Sioux Falls, SD
Thank you for sharing your expertise. I do plan on buying one or the other and I just wanted some knowledgable input.
I can understand that, happy wife - happy home!!!
Bob
I can understand that, happy wife - happy home!!!
Bob
Feb 13, 2023 12:37:52 #
Feb 13, 2023 12:38:55 #
Feb 13, 2023 14:45:24 #
Bob in SD wrote:
This was very helpful and appreciated
Bob
Bob
If you clicked "quote reply" on the bottom of the post you are answering as I did here, we can tell who you are addressing.
Feb 13, 2023 16:29:40 #
Bob in SD wrote:
Thank you for sharing your expertise. I do plan on buying one or the other and I just wanted some knowledgable input.
I can understand that, happy wife - happy home!!!
Bob
I can understand that, happy wife - happy home!!!
Bob
Well, yeah...But keep in mind, happy husband, no one gets hurt!
Feb 13, 2023 16:40:03 #
Retired CPO wrote:
Well, yeah...But keep in mind, happy husband, no one gets hurt!
She said it's okay to agree with you.
Feb 13, 2023 18:00:19 #
DaveO wrote:
She said it's okay to agree with you.
Well, just kidding
Feb 14, 2023 05:24:12 #
Bob in SD wrote:
You will need very good light to work with a 1.4 TC on your camera. I have problems with aquiiring focus with the 200-500 lower light levels or lower contrast levels. In good light the 200 500 is a great lens.I would really like to hear what your thoughts are... (show quote)
Feb 14, 2023 06:01:32 #
Bob in SD wrote:
Thanks everyone for your information. It is most appreciated.
Bob
Bob
Good Morning,
I relied on the 200-500 w/1.4 prior to purchasing the 500 PF 5.6. Whenever this type of question is raised the ‘I never user a TC’ pseudo-elitist false-purists emerge en masse. Reach is reach and there is no substitute. And the high-end fast prime telephotos are simply not realistic purchases for many, including myself. And one cannot always ‘take a few steps closer.’
The 150-600 G2 w/ 1.4 is a touch soft at 840; the 200-500 w/1.4 at 700 less so.
Ignore the anti-TC bias and enjoy either combo! (:
doclrb
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.