Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

Ie. if it truly was intended to appear as a disinterested investigatory body. (which it wasn't)

Article by Victor Davis Hansen

1. Why for the first time in history did Speaker Pelosi forbid the House Minority Leader’s nominees to a special House committee? Only two Republicans served who would be out of office come January 2023; and they both despised Trump and voted for the second Trump impeachment.

Why did Pelosi ensure that there would be no cross-examinations of any witnesses, no disagreements about witness lists, no contrasting interviews to the media about the work of the committee, and no diversity in staff interrogatories.

2. Why did the Committee not investigate whether the FBI had numerous agents and informants present on January 6th?

3. Why did the Committee not review the circumstances in detail of the deaths of Officer Brian Sicknick and the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt? Babbitt’s perhaps was the only violent death at the direct hand of a known other.

4. Why did the Committee not investigate and release all the communications between Pelosi and the Capitol police to learn why the Capitol was virtually open and unsecured on that day?

5. Why did the Committee not investigate all incendiary speech by major elected officials at iconic Washington buildings, deemed inflammatory and allegedly resulting in violence at a subsequent time? For example, in 2020 then Senator Minority Leader Chuck Schumer screamed to a large demonstration massed at the doors of the Supreme Court: "I want to tell you Gorsuch, I want to tell you Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”

“You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price”? “Hit you”? Did Donald Trump say to supporting demonstrators on January 6th anything like, “Pelosi and Pence, if you release the whirlwind, you will pay the price. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with awful decisions.”

Does anyone doubt had Trump said that, would he now be in jail for attempted assassination or insurrection?

Note that not too long after Schumer’s threats, protestors illegally swarmed the homes of Conservative Supreme Court justices, and most tellingly a would-be assassin at Kavanaugh's.

And Why did the Committee not investigate all organized rioting by activist groups that also damaged federal properties, such as in 2020 a federal courthouse that was torched and attempts to storm the White House grounds to endanger a president who had to be evacuated to the bunker?

7. Why did the Committee not release the entire 14,000 hours of video? Why did the Committee not release the full transcripts of those it interrogated, rather than segments they chose? Why not the conditions with which it compelled witnesses to make them appear?

Can any Libs/Dems answer any of these questions cogently? I will forward them to VDH in your name.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Intelligent people all know why.
Only libs are too stupid to understand the concepts presented.
This is a great list of Intelligent questions.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

There were no GOP members on the committee because the GOP leadership wouldn't nominate any.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Yes they did and Pelosi refused to seat them.

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

He couldn't get beyond the 10th word of the opening point to find, "Speaker Pelosi forbid the House Minority Leader’s nominees..."

Wasn't sure about his attention-span/reading skills all along.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Now we all know.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

The ones that were refused were because they were the subject of the investigation.
Try to keep up.

WNYShooter Loc: WNY

They hadn't begun the investigation yet genius.

SteveR Loc: Michigan

I've read that now that the Republicans are in charge of the House, much of the evidence not seen before will come to light, similar to the Twitter files.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Only 2 of the 5 , then McCarthy pulled the other 3 and pouted.

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

What a stupid response and a lie.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Neither stupid or a lie.
You're just uninformed, once again.

mwalsh Loc: Houston

I don't think uniformed is the issue.

More like willful, premeditated obtuseness.

He is a caricature after all.




You should be able to relate at some level!

btbg

That is a lie and you know it. They nominated five and Pelosi wrongly kicked some of them off. After that they refused to nominate anyone new. But if you look at google you will see that even CBS news noted that the Republican nominations were reasonable.

Here's a link to their story about the nominations.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mccarthy-january-6-committee-republicans/

And, here is a quote from the article. "Although he considered choosing more controversial members — or none at all — to appoint to the committee, McCarthy's final decision represents a safe choice of generally experienced members with committee leadership experience and party loyalty."

You will note that the mainstream media believed that the nominations were reasonable. So, don't be blaming the Republicans for the lack of Republicans on the committee.

FrumCA

These are all very legitimate questions that the left will continue to sweep under the rug as long as they can. The only answers you will get will be deflections and denials.