Team Crazy Follies! Ethics? We don't Need No Stinkin' Ethics! https://nationalzero.com/2023/01/02/mccarthy-promises-to-gut-office-of-congressional-ethics/ Endorsed by Rep-elect Santos...

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

https://nationalzero.com/2023/01/02/mccarthy-promises-to-gut-office-of-congressional-ethics/

Endorsed by Rep-elect Santos (R-NY)

Seriously--you can't make this stuff up

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Almost off the left bias chart, I suspect editorial of being nothing more than click bait for the gullible.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

letmedance wrote:

Almost off the left bias chart, I suspect editorial of being nothing more than click bait for the gullible.

Anything untrue in the link? Or you just don't want to see the abject corruption in the current Pub party?

Do you not see the irony of gutting the Ethics Committee just in time for the arrival of Rep Santos?

Texcaster Loc: Queensland

Bazbo wrote:

Anything untrue in the link? Or you just don't want to see the abject corruption in the current Pub party?

Do you not see the irony of gutting the Ethics Committee just in time for the arrival of Rep Santos?

Irony? In this place? It mostly just pisses the corps de MAGA types off.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Bazbo wrote:

https://nationalzero.com/2023/01/02/mccarthy-promises-to-gut-office-of-congressional-ethics/

Endorsed by Rep-elect Santos (R-NY)

Seriously--you can't make this stuff up

Really, National Zero? Isn't that a bit like posting from Infowars, just worse? I read the article and the comments below, hateful garbage.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

https://nationalzero.com/2023/01/02/mccarthy-promises-to-gut-office-of-congressional-ethics/

Endorsed by Rep-elect Santos (R-NY)

Seriously--you can't make this stuff up

Why do stupid people use that dumb phrase?

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

https://nationalzero.com/2023/01/02/mccarthy-promises-to-gut-office-of-congressional-ethics/

Endorsed by Rep-elect Santos (R-NY)

Seriously--you can't make this stuff up

LOL Nationalzero.com as someone just mentioned above?

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Blurryeyed wrote:

Really, National Zero? Isn't that a bit like posting from Infowars, just worse? I read the article and the comments below, hateful garbage.

Anything untrue in the link? You can find this news in several sources.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Racmanaz wrote:

LOL Nationalzero.com as someone just mentioned above?

Anything untrue in the link? You can find this news in several sources.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

Anything untrue in the link? You can find this news in several sources.

Yes a few lies by this trash can website you utilized, here is one of them.

https://www.cnbc.c⁶om/2022/09/23/matt-gaetz-sex-trafficking-probe-prosecutors-recommend-against-charges.html

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Racmanaz wrote:

Yes a few lies by this trash can website you utilized, here is one of them.

https://www.cnbc.c⁶om/2022/09/23/matt-gaetz-sex-trafficking-probe-prosecutors-recommend-against-charges.html

Don't defect. I could not open your link, but from the title this appears to have nothing t do with the ethics committee. Attacking sources instead of addressing the merits is a sure sign you are on the losing side of an argument.

Is the ethics committee reporting not true? Provide a link.

It would be a full time job quoting all the unrelated lies in your sources.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Since none of you right wingers seem to be able to demonstrate that the actual reporting is untrue, here are some more sources for you to attack while you run away from the truth:
https://www.rawstory.com/house-ethics-office/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/05/house-republicans-office-congressional-ethics-santos-january-6

https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacheverson/2023/01/03/house-republicans-back-in-charge-move-to-undercut-ethics-office/?sh=7330b8322b8a

https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-republicans-plan-to-make-changes-to-ethics-office-11672708247

https://www.salon.com/2023/01/03/this-must-be-stopped-kevin-mccarthys-first-move-is-to-gut-congressional-ethics-watchdog/

Of course, any of you could have done a little research in order to fact check which would have been fair fame. But I understand it would have been too much work.

There is plenty of more sources of course. So attack the sources instead of dealing with the facts.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

Don't defect. I could not open your link, but from the title this appears to have nothing t do with the ethics committee. Attacking sources instead of addressing the merits is a sure sign you are on the losing side of an argument.

Is the ethics committee reporting not true? Provide a link.

It would be a full time job quoting all the unrelated lies in your sources.

You must be illiterate, this is the question you asked and I gave you one example and then YOU deflected.

Bazbo wrote:
Anything untrue in the link? You can find this news in several sources.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

Since none of you right wingers seem to be able to... (show quote)

You are accusing us of running away from the truth while you are posting from a trash can website that's known for false information and conspiracies? LOL

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Bazbo wrote:

Since none of you right wingers seem to be able to... (show quote)

Never said the story was untrue just that the website and story you chose to link could hardly contain more slime, you should have just chosen the Time article to begin with that not only contained a much fuller accounting of the story but also was devoid of the insults that the slime site you seem to like excels in.