DI Seller Loc: Knoxville, TN

I'm ready to make the switch to mirrorless after using a Nikon D60 since it's release in 2008. I have only the kit lens. I've narrowed it down to a Nikon Z6II and a Sony a7III. I will be using it for general photography (landscape, action shots and portrait). Just can't seem to make up my mind. I've relied on the opinion of all that contribute to this forum. I could use all the input I can get. I would also value any advise about alternate recommendations.

I look forward to your replies.

Zaydewise Loc: Nashville TN

Sony has more third party lenses than NIKON Z series. Both are very good cameras but I have used Sony for years and I have a number of Tamron lenses that are great and half the price of Sony lenses. I currently have a Sony a7r IV

sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri

I doubt that there could be a bad choice among the major brands today. I view the body as the least expensive part of the investment for a collection of lenses may easily surpass the cost of the body alone. I find the lenses to be the most important part of the system. The camera body does not care what the quality of the lens is, however, the user does in order to get the result they desire. Also, the choice of lenses plays an important part in what venue the user pursues. The macro lenses are different from those used for birds in flight, which are different from wide-angle landscapes, etc.

Enjoy the journey.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

From what I've read, the Z6 II is a good choice, considering the price difference. Below are opinions from people who have tested both. Considering the 50% difference in price, nothing about the Z7 cries out to me. I have the Z6 II, and I like it. I've never been impressed by the number of focus points. I use a single point, and I put it where I want it.

https://photographylife.com/nikon-z6-ii-vs-z7-ii
https://www.imaging-resource.com/cameras/nikon/z7-ii/vs/nikon/z6-ii/
https://cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-Z7-Mark-II-vs-Nikon-Z6-Mark-II
https://www.t3.com/us/news/nikon-z6-ii-vs-nikon-z7-ii
https://mirrorlesscomparison.com/nikon-vs-nikon/z6-vs-z6ii-vs-z7-vs-z7ii/

YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Nikon+Z6ii+vs+Z7ii

Architect1776 Loc: In my mind

Sony has better AF generally than Nikon.
More lenses available.
Two things to consider.

CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City

Although all the logics says 'change to mirrorless', there's no logical reason to change brands too.

bikinkawboy Loc: north central Missouri

As mentioned, basically all are good cameras anymore and most are capable of doing my than most will ever ask of it. The one thing that can’t be changed is its weight, shape and contours. Cameras are like shoes: what fits you perfectly might be a terrible fit for me. And if a good looking pair of shoes hurts to wear, they will set unused in a closet.

If you are aged with weakness in your extremities, weight will be a big factor. If you are a person with very small hands or arthritis, the shape a location of controls will be very important.

I have an older, bottom of the line Canon DSLR. Pretty good older camera to be sure, but nothing has changed since I got my first DSLR 15 years ago. It doesn’t fit my rather large hands. The smaller Canon’s didn’t feel comfortable back then and they don’t now. The upscale models might but I’ve never tried one. Nikons simply feel more natural to me and controls are where my fingers think they should be.

I suggest you go to a camera store and check out different brands. With motorcycles, the way to adjust the handlebars, levers and such is to set on it and with your eyes closed, reach for them. If they are where you reach, it’s good. If not, you need to adjust them. Do that with a camera and with your eyes closed see if things feel right. For me, Canon shutter buttons are in the wrong location and I have to feel around for it. Every time.

User ID

If the camera you want is a different brand then that alone is a logical reason the change brands. Theres no left over lenses from the old APSC SLR Nikon to anchor the user to the Nikon brand when moving to FF.

My two best FF 24MP cameras are an a7III and a Z6. They are not alike but they are definitely equals. Favoring one over the other varies in rather short cycles (weeks, months).

For examples right now its the Sony cuz it has a new trio of compact Sigma primes that are not offered in Z-mount. OTOH all of my cameras share a hoard of EOS EF lenses via adapters, and the Nikon does seem a bit more "adapter friendly" (but just a bit).

Reflecting on two "UHH Hot" issues, the Sony has better AF (the Nikon is no slouch) but the Nikon has dual slots (for verrrrry expensive cards). Whatz "UHH Hot" is meaningless to me but YMMV.

Orphoto Loc: Oregon

With a 14 year old body and only 1 kit lens he is not wedded to a system or brand.

In reality...this is GAP, Gear Acquisition Phobia.

Bill_de Loc: US

I have used Nikon for a long time. So, if I was to recommend anything else it would be based on hearsay, so I won't. I have a Z6 and if I was buying a "6" today it would be the Z6II as they have made some improvements over the Z6. I also own a Z50 and a Zfc cropped sensor cameras. Both are small and light and provide very good image quality. Since you have been working with one lens all these years you should be able to find all you need in the Nikon Z "DX" family.

We all have our own preferences, and I don't think any of the major brands make bad cameras these days. If you have a camera store where you can wrap your hands around different cameras, buy the one that is most comfortable in your hands.

---

ronpier Loc: Poland Ohio

My first pick would be the one with the learning curve similar to what I am currently using and then move on from there to which one would serve me better.

Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.

As Sippyjug stated, you really can’t go wrong with any of the major brands. You could go to a camera store and hold each in your hand to see which one feels better to you. Since you already own a Nikon you are familiar with the Nikon menu system, you wouldn’t have to learn a new (Sony) system. I have the Nikon Z 6II and I am happy with it. I’ve never used the Sony a7III so I can not give a a comparison.

PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA

Since I started my digital with Canon, I have stayed with it and have no issues. However, the current Canon policy of not allowing 3rd parties to sell RF mount lenses would have me worried if I were just starting out. I use an EF-R adapter and don't worry about it.

I can't explain why, but I seem to rate Sony above Nikon in mirrorless, perhaps because they have been at it longer.

As far as GAS - he who dies with the most toys wins!

DI Seller Loc: Knoxville, TN

Thank you to everyone who has chimed in with their comments. Each one is very helpful. If you think of anything else, please let me know.

DI Seller Loc: Knoxville, TN

Thank you to everyone who has chimed in with their comments. Each one is very helpful. If you think of anything else, please let me know.