According to Steve Perry, the Z9 is a good camera with some very nice features. I'm all set to order one as soon as they cut the price in half.
Good luck on that price reduction purchase!
I use that camera. Love it but a bit frustrated about the iso noise.
I believe Steve is leaning more toward SONY now, but still using the Nikon gear too.
Charles Loy wrote:
Good luck on that price reduction purchase!
I use that camera. Love it but a bit frustrated about the iso noise.
I believe Steve is leaning more toward SONY now, but still using the Nikon gear too.
I had to be careful about posting that because of the L*nks issue. Maybe it won't be moved. I watched a good Z9 video by Steve last night. No, I have no need for a camera of that quality - and price.
Probably safe to post the link now that we've had some discussion of the topic.
jerryc41 wrote:
According to Steve Perry, the Z9 is a good camera with some very nice features. I'm all set to order one as soon as they cut the price in half.
When that happens, I will be next in line...
Another great feature of the Z9 that all cameras should have is the sensor guard. Take off the lens, and you'll see a shutter covering the opening to the inside of the camera. Of course, that's going to add cost, so only upper class cameras would have that feature.
Even with the guard, the Z9 collects a lot of dust on the sensor.
Actually the best feature of the Z9 is that it has no shutter.
Jerry, it is hard to argue the Z9 is a great camera. It has great reviews and professionals are using it. The price scares me, I could have better use for those $5000.
I am at a stage in my life where a simple camera could easily cover my needs. I do not need 120 FPS nor I need the most sophisticated and fastest AF. As a matter of fact, I shoot more landscapes than anything else and for that any camera with a 16 megapixels sensor will cover my needs. I seldom enlarge to more than 12x18 inches but with those 16 megapixels I know I can go larger, something that I will rarely do.
Because I seldom use ISO settings beyond 1600 noise is not an issue in my photography. If I see noise and I want to suppress it I give the file a pass through Topaz Denoise and I am not using any of those sophisticated AI versions. Dust on the sensor is no issue either, Olympus has the best dust control machine of any camera made. I had never cleaned a sensor in my Olympus cameras. Having lenses available from Olympus and Panasonic is a godsend.
I have my opinion because not everybody needs such a sophisticated camera. There is a big difference between I want and I need.
camerapapi wrote:
Jerry, it is hard to argue the Z9 is a great camera. It has great reviews and professionals are using it. The price scares me, I could have better use for those $5000.
I am at a stage in my life where a simple camera could easily cover my needs. I do not need 120 FPS nor I need the most sophisticated and fastest AF. As a matter of fact, I shoot more landscapes than anything else and for that any camera with a 16 megapixels sensor will cover my needs. I seldom enlarge to more than 12x18 inches but with those 16 megapixels I know I can go larger, something that I will rarely do.
Because I seldom use ISO settings beyond 1600 noise is not an issue in my photography. If I see noise and I want to suppress it I give the file a pass through Topaz Denoise and I am not using any of those sophisticated AI versions. Dust on the sensor is no issue either, Olympus has the best dust control machine of any camera made. I had never cleaned a sensor in my Olympus cameras. Having lenses available from Olympus and Panasonic is a godsend.
I have my opinion because not everybody needs such a sophisticated camera. There is a big difference between I want and I need.
Jerry, it is hard to argue the Z9 is a great camer... (
show quote)
The thread is about the Z9. It's good to know you don't need one. Thanks for keeping us apprised.
---
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.