Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Still looking for a monopod, you might want to consider this.
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Aug 14, 2022 11:22:11   #
Canisdirus
 
There are obviously times when dynamic range is not a primary concern.
Thank you Capt. obvious.

But most times...you want maximum dynamic range...period.

You're paying for it after all.

Can a photographer find a way to make lesser quality images look nice...sure...but it's just that much more work in post processing...and you'll never get there.

No...your goal is to bake in the full dynamic range as much as possible.
Depending on your gear of course...kit gear...who cares...you have other problems.
Depending on your skill level.

Anyone can take lesser images.

The skill is getting the same shots at 100 when everyone else has moved up.

Reply
Aug 14, 2022 11:25:29   #
User ID
 
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
Iso not asa
Whatevvvvvver .......... ISO, ASA, DIN, Weston etc etc

Technically, I never use any of them. I always prefer the tested EI.

Reply
Aug 14, 2022 11:35:54   #
User ID
 
Canisdirus wrote:
There are obviously times when dynamic range is not a primary concern.
Thank you Capt. obvious.

But most times...you want maximum dynamic range...period.

You're paying for it after all.

Can a photographer find a way to make lesser quality images look nice...sure...but it's just that much more work in post processing...and you'll never get there.

No...your goal is to bake in the full dynamic range as much as possible.
Depending on your gear of course...kit gear...who cares...you have other problems.
Depending on your skill level.

Anyone can take lesser images.

The skill is getting the same shots at 100 when everyone else has moved up.
There are obviously times when dynamic range is no... (show quote)

Your standards are just for geeks, with little connection to actual photography, especially as concerns printing and electronic displays.

There always *plenty* of DR at nearly any ISO. You correctly state how to get even more DR but that will also mean getting less of everything else that goes into making a photograph.

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Aug 14, 2022 18:23:26   #
Canisdirus
 
User ID wrote:
Your standards are just for geeks, with little connection to actual photography, especially as concerns printing and electronic displays.

There always *plenty* of DR at nearly any ISO. You correctly state how to get even more DR but that will also mean getting less of everything else that goes into making a photograph.


Uh...no.
It's for people who wish to understand how to get the most from their efforts.

If you don't think dynamic range is a big selling point in high end photography...you are not paying attention.
It makes a difference in the images.

Reply
Aug 14, 2022 22:12:08   #
User ID
 
Canisdirus wrote:
Uh...no.
It's for people who wish to understand how to get the most from their efforts.

If you don't think dynamic range is a big selling point in high end photography...you are not paying attention.
It makes a difference in the images.

They are NOT getting more for their efforts. They are getting slightly more of one thing, dynamic range. To get that by lowering ISO you get LESS of the other important parameters, shutter speed and DoF. There being plenty of DR available well above base ISO theres no gain in compromising the shutter speed and DoF.

Base ISO is TERRIFIC for shooting flat copy. Theres no need for DoF, theres no motion, so why not minimize noise and maximize DR when you copy flat art ? Acoarst you use base ISO for that. But for real world subjects you consider ALL variables and make useful trade offs. You dont concentrate on one variable at the expense of the others.

Reply
Aug 14, 2022 23:32:54   #
MDI Mainer
 
And if your subject calls for more dynamic range than the sensor can capture at the necessary ISO, there are the in-camera HDR or DRO functions, or auto bracketing and a post processing app on RAW files. These options often allow you to go beyond the sensor's DR limit, no matter how good that might be.

So to my mind there is seldom a logical reason to limit ISO because of DR concerns.

Reply
Aug 15, 2022 09:04:38   #
Canisdirus
 
User ID wrote:
They are NOT getting more for their efforts. They are getting slightly more of one thing, dynamic range. To get that by lowering ISO you get LESS of the other important parameters, shutter speed and DoF. There being plenty of DR available well above base ISO theres no gain in compromising the shutter speed and DoF.

Base ISO is TERRIFIC for shooting flat copy. Theres no need for DoF, theres no motion, so why not minimize noise and maximize DR when you copy flat art ? Acoarst you use base ISO for that. But for real world subjects you consider ALL variables and make useful trade offs. You dont concentrate on one variable at the expense of the others.
They are NOT getting more for their efforts. They ... (show quote)


I never said to only concentrate on iso.
Shooting flat copy? lol...no dof..no motion...who cares? Has nothing to do with getting all the dynamic range your camera can give you in every shot you take.

No one should care what the dof variable is...or if there is motion or not...when deciding to use maximum dynamic range.

You don't have to of course. Use the camera with less quality...doesn't bother me a bit.

The skill comes from getting the MOST from your camera...not an average.

Reply
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Aug 15, 2022 14:03:43   #
User ID
 
Canisdirus wrote:
I never said to only concentrate on iso.
Shooting flat copy? lol...no dof..no motion...who cares? Has nothing to do with getting all the dynamic range your camera can give you in every shot you take.

No one should care what the dof variable is...or if there is motion or not...when deciding to use maximum dynamic range.

You don't have to of course. Use the camera with less quality...doesn't bother me a bit.

The skill comes from getting the MOST from your camera...not an average.
I never said to only concentrate on iso. br Shooti... (show quote)

Nope. Youre getting the most from your sensor, and ONLY your sensor, not the entire versatile multifaceted tool that is your camera.

Reply
Aug 15, 2022 20:46:10   #
Canisdirus
 
User ID wrote:
Nope. Youre getting the most from your sensor, and ONLY your sensor, not the entire versatile multifaceted tool that is your camera.


Somehow...you have managed to say...nothing at all.

Reply
Aug 15, 2022 23:46:23   #
Sidwalkastronomy Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
Canisdirus wrote:
Somehow...you have managed to say...nothing at all.


Are you surprised??
Read all his tweets

Reply
Aug 16, 2022 08:20:14   #
Canisdirus
 
Sidwalkastronomy wrote:
Are you surprised??
Read all his tweets


A long time ago...when I was dating my future wife...we went to a bar after picking up her and her 3 friends. They all worked at a bank, and I swung by and the bar was just down the block.
Well the four of them order their rounds...while I racked a pool table.

This guy sidles up to my gf and starts bragging about...stuff...you know the type.
It was so obvious to everyone...but him.

At first the gals just wanted to rebuff him...but I had a better idea...just go along with him I said...believe his tall tales...let him feel comfortable...we'll drink all night for free.

That guy spent over 400 bucks on them (I paid my tab as I went)...each story less believable. He really thought he was fooling everyone.
Finally, near the end of the night...we're blotto...I go to the can and the 'dude' is in there...wobbling.

I said my goodbyes there...wished him luck and told him he needed a new game plan.

I think it must have been User ID that night...uncanny parallels.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.