For those that always ask, what tripod should I buy. Here is a something to consider.
Recommending a tripod without considering the photographer's requirements is irresponsible. Factors that must be considered are: The photographer's height; the longest focal length lens that will be used (now or in the future); the highest megapixel sensor/camera that will be used; terrain (level ground, mid-stream, or hillside); maximum equipment weight; and possible wind or vibration (near a road) environment.
Also keep in mind a way to actuate the shutter without touching the camera.
I think you guys should read the comment...
For those that always ask "What tripod should I buy?". Here is something to consider.
This drips of sarcasm.
That's a great price on a high quality tripod! If I needed one I would surely consider this one. Thanks for thinking of others.
The post was an alert to a special price deal (from a reputable dealer) that basically cut the price of this quality-brand tripod in half for a 24-hour period.
So in my judgement it was a responsible, well-intentioned and usefully informative post.
jackpinoh wrote:
Recommending a tripod without considering the photographer's requirements is irresponsible. Factors that must be considered are: The photographer's height; the longest focal length lens that will be used (now or in the future); the highest megapixel sensor/camera that will be used; terrain (level ground, mid-stream, or hillside); maximum equipment weight; and possible wind or vibration (near a road) environment.
All that UHH BS can safely be ignored.
The customer clicks he link, sees the price, checks the features, and doesnt need some busybody geek involved in their decision. Its really that simple.
User ID wrote:
All that UHH BS can safely be ignored.
The customer clicks the link, sees the price, checks the features, and doesn't need some busybody geek involved in their decision. Its really that simple.
I sometimes think there are a number of would-be PhD candidates here, who never got the chance to write or defend a dissertation, and so can't now resist the opportunity.
I like the article that makes reference to the "best tripod" as the one we can handle. Well, it does not work like that but comes close.
I have several tripods, from a heavy Gitzo aluminum to a cheap ($45) Dolica aluminum tripod. A couple of years ago my son gave me an inexpensive carbon fiber one and it has been the Dolica the tripod I am using more often. It is light, easy to carry in my travels and it does a great job, even when using heavy dSLR cameras when using proper tripod techniques.
My Manfrotto 2031, another heavy aluminum tripod from the 70's served me very well in the past when I was using film. It lacks spikes which are a very good feature in landscape photography. Today I rarely use it. The Gitzo was used mainly with my film medium format but it has not seen any use ever since. I agree that some factors play a role when selecting a tripod. The height of the person is important and how the tripod is going to be used is another. I prefer a ball head but choice of head is something personal that will better accommodate the photographer's style.
A tripod is not an accessory, it is a necessity.
Too bad the list of specials changed for those that might have been interested in the tripod which ever it was on 8-10. One day sale, came and went. And there seems to be an answer to which tripod by every single UUH member. Probably the major topic with the least consensus.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.