The Fraud That Dare Not Speak Its Name: (1) Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary, 2,000 Mules , raises serious questions about possible skullduggery in the 2020 election. (2) The analysis...

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

(1) Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary, 2,000 Mules, raises serious questions about possible skullduggery in

the 2020 election.

(2) The analysis indicates that the 2,000 mules were on average visiting 38 drop boxes, sometimes in

the middle of the night, and often inserting multiple ballots.

(3) There isn’t anyone left in mainstream journalism interested in the truth when it comes to election

issues—just regime flunkies paid to criticize Dinesh D’Souza.

https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/the-fraud-dare-not-speak-its-name

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Slomo. If at this point you still believe that the 2020 election was stolen you are, not interested in the truth, just merely interested in winning..
How can I nicely inform you that you are acting like a fool?

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

Frank T wrote:

Slomo. If at this point you still believe that the 2020 election was stolen you are, not interested in the truth, just merely interested in winning..
How can I nicely inform you that you are acting like a fool?

He’s not acting.

FrumCA

Frank T wrote:

Slomo. If at this point you still believe that the 2020 election was stolen you are, not interested in the truth, just merely interested in winning..
How can I nicely inform you that you are acting like a fool?

The real fools are those of you who categorically reject the evidence of potential or possibly real fraudulent actions. You are only interested in practicing your denial tactics without considering the evidence put in front of you.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

FrumCA wrote:

The real fools are those of you who categorically reject the evidence of potential or possibly real fraudulent actions. You are only interested in practicing your denial tactics without considering the evidence put in front of you.

Some of you guys insist on referencing all of this revealing evidence of “fraudulent” actions, but where is it? What is there that could be widespread enough to have a damning effect? Saying there is evidence hardly makes it true. Too many responsible people, including members of both parties, claim this so called evidence does not exist.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

Doubting fools will believe every word uttered by the so called elite press, without a doubt you all accept the blanket statement that the election was the most honest ever, may I ask how they determined this.

srg

slocumeddie wrote:

(1) Dinesh D’Souza’s new documentary, b 2,000 Mul... (show quote)

Ninjas

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

letmedance wrote:

Doubting fools will believe every word uttered by the so called elite press, without a doubt you all accept the blanket statement that the election was the most honest ever, may I ask how they determined this.

Many do not say that, but rather that the fraud was not widespread enough to affect the outcome. There has been no tangible evidence to contradict that.

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

del

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

DaveO wrote:

Many do not say that, but rather that the fraud was not widespread enough to affect the outcome. There has been no tangible evidence to contradict that.

Wrong.....there is incontrovertible evidence available that you reject out of hand.....

Watch the movie.....

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

slocumeddie wrote:

Wrong.....there is incontrovertible evidence available that you reject out of hand.....

Watch the movie.....

LOL, the only evidence you present is in your hand!

Your little hang up, along with many others, makes you look quite foolish.

FrumCA

DaveO wrote:

Many do not say that, but rather that the fraud was not widespread enough to affect the outcome. There has been no tangible evidence to contradict that.

I disagree Dave. There was a lot of tangible evidence of possible fraud. The only thing tangible is most it never made it to a jury for consideration. Note, I am not saying that there was enough fraud to overturn the election but there was certainly some that would logically generate some concern that some of us would like to see resolved.

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

DaveO wrote:

LOL, the only evidence you present is in your hand!

Watch the movie...... what do you fear.....???

PS....."incontrovertible evidence" is a strong statement.....I don't make it lightly.....

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

slocumeddie wrote:

Wrong.....there is incontrovertible evidence available that you reject out of hand.....

Watch the movie.....

Even Ann Coulter doesn't agree with you.

jcboy3

slocumeddie wrote:

Watch the movie...... what do you fear.....???

PS....."incontrovertible evidence" is a strong statement.....I don't make it lightly.....

The movie is lies and innuendo. Typical pitiful sloppy thinking from Dinesh D’Souza.