I have a question for the Supreme Court nominee congressional committee: Why aren't you alleging the nominee was pulling the train at a college kegger and forcing her to answer to that...

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Why aren't you alleging the nominee was pulling the train at a college kegger and forcing her to answer to that in the presence of her family? Jus askin

pendennis

The Republicans on the committee are not a bunch of clueless, classless, boors, like the Dimms, for starters.

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

That pretty much sums it up.
--Bob

pendennis wrote:

The Republicans on the committee are not a bunch of clueless, classless, boors, like the Dimms, for starters.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

idaholover wrote:

Why aren't you alleging the nominee was pulling the train at a college kegger and forcing her to answer to that in the presence of her family? Jus askin

Do you have evidence?

btbg

thom w wrote:

Do you have evidence?

Just out of curiosity why would anyone need evidence. They didn't need evidence when they made the claims against Kavanaugh.

InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA

Look, I've listened to some of the Q and A out of the hearing. There is no doubt, we're getting this lady as a Supreme. Considering how off the wall some of the liberal picks could be, I think we should count ourselves lucky Joe picked this woman.

Just remember back to when there was speculation that Kamala might retire out of the VP slot to take the job? Could you imagine having someone that mind-numbingly insufferable in that job for 30 years?

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

btbg wrote:

Just out of curiosity why would anyone need evidence. They didn't need evidence when they made the claims against Kavanaugh.

I believe Kavanaugh's reaction to the questions showed him to not have the proper temperament. Whether any of the charges were valid, I have no idea. The evidence seems pretty good that he was a partier, and he liked to drink. I don't find either disqualifying, but his reaction was unseemly. Tit for tat doesn't help you to appear to be an adult.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

thom w wrote:

Do you have evidence?

Don’t need any. Ask Kavanaugh

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

thom w wrote:

Do you have evidence?

LOL... Really Thom?

InfiniteISO Loc: The Carolinas, USA

thom w wrote:

I believe Kavanaugh's reaction to the questions showed him to not have the proper temperament. Whether any of the charges were valid, I have no idea. The evidence seems pretty good that he was a partier, and he liked to drink. I don't find either disqualifying, but his reaction was unseemly. Tit for tat doesn't help you to appear to be an adult.

I think you need to re-examine the timeline for the Kavanaugh hearings. They were almost complete and then the false claims came out and his vote was delayed because of the "seriousness" of the charges. At this point there's no doubt in anyone's mind that the "victims" were perjuring themselves. To his credit Kavanaugh didn't really get testy until his final comments. I think his attitude in those comments helped his vote. He was righteously indignant.

It's has been a common, revisionist tack to claim that, guilty or not, Kavanaugh did not display the proper temperament for the job. Let's see you get up in front of the entire world and have people lie under oath about your behavior with your wife and children looking on. There's a special place in hell reserved for Christine Blasey Ford.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

thom w wrote:

I believe Kavanaugh's reaction to the questions showed him to not have the proper temperament. Whether any of the charges were valid, I have no idea. The evidence seems pretty good that he was a partier, and he liked to drink. I don't find either disqualifying, but his reaction was unseemly. Tit for tat doesn't help you to appear to be an adult.

I disagree totally, I think that the behavior of the democrat Senators during the Kavanaugh hearing should have had them all impeached for being liars and completely dishonest with the American people. As far as his temperament? You sit down through having your credibility and honor slandered but some of the most powerful and corrupt people in the country for days and weeks on end while their compliant media slanders you 24/7 and see if you can hold it together.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Blurryeyed wrote:

LOL... Really Thom?

Ya, he really asked that 🤣🤣

Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan

I would ask her how does she know she is a woman if she can't define it.

Wuligal Loc: Slippery Rock, Pa.

InfiniteISO wrote:

I think you need to re-examine the timeline for th... (show quote)

Great response to Mr. T.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

InfiniteISO wrote:

I think you need to re-examine the timeline for th... (show quote)

And Diane Finestein along with Harris, Spartacus and a slew of other democrat Senators.