Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Muscular girl
Mar 17, 2022 15:26:22 #
Mar 17, 2022 15:27:15 #
Mar 17, 2022 16:50:44 #
mjc925
Loc: SF Bay Area
For my tastes the grain is a bit too overwhelming of the image, but as a guy who likes and uses grain this is very subjective. I don't care for for the boarder. First I am not sure what it is or what is adds to the photo. Second, it cuts into the model's fingers and head and completely across the middle of the image on the bottom, not sure if that was intended. In the endless debate of tattoos vs no tats, I have my opinions but they don't factor into the critique of the merits of the photo, only upon my overall enjoyment of the images, which again is subjective and personal.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Mar 17, 2022 18:13:17 #
Garty Northrop
Loc: SE Washington State
Yep. If a 25 year old gal gets a tasteful tattoo of a small concord
grape on her left breast, by the time she's 70 it will be an eggplant.
grape on her left breast, by the time she's 70 it will be an eggplant.
Mar 17, 2022 18:30:39 #
How about all you "NEGATIVE" people have some decency. All of us have our tastes. Just because someone is different from you doesn't give you the right to publicly abuse that person. An apology to her would be in order.
Mar 17, 2022 18:42:28 #
leftj
Loc: Texas
ski wrote:
How about all you "NEGATIVE" people have some decency. All of us have our tastes. Just because someone is different from you doesn't give you the right to publicly abuse that person. An apology to her would be in order.
Welcome to UHH AOC.
Mar 17, 2022 23:39:32 #
mjc925 wrote:
For my tastes the grain is a bit too overwhelming ... (show quote)
Thank goodness someone had the common sense to discuss the image! I totally agree that for my taste, the image is just too grainy and I wasn't wild about the composition either. Again, if the OP is happy with the image, all the better.
As far as the never ending comments about "tats" and how gorgeous/sexy/appealing/desirable/whatever the subject is, I wish people would stick to their insight into the photographic technique.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Mar 17, 2022 23:57:00 #
Rolk wrote:
Thank goodness someone had the common sense to discuss the image! I totally agree that for my taste, the image is just too grainy and I wasn't wild about the composition either. Again, if the OP is happy with the image, all the better.
As far as the never ending comments about "tats" and how gorgeous/sexy/appealing/desirable/whatever the subject is, I wish people would stick to their insight into the photographic technique.
As far as the never ending comments about "tats" and how gorgeous/sexy/appealing/desirable/whatever the subject is, I wish people would stick to their insight into the photographic technique.
"Content" is one of the seven critique criteria.
Okay. I made that up. Seems like seven is a good number. (everyone lighten up and enjoy the exchange of thoughts)
Mar 18, 2022 05:57:12 #
SteveFranz
Loc: Durham, NC
RogStrix wrote:
Not a good choice, the original complainant was referring to the model having tattoos, saying she would look better without them in their opinion, to which they are entitled. To compare tattoos to graffiti is a different subject. Like it or lump it, well done graffiti is an art form of its own.
Yes, graffiti can be very artistic. But it not suitable everywhere. Graffiti on a bridge or passing railroad car - OK. Graffiti at Yosemite - inappropriate.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.