Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Post processing vs. no-Post processing
Page <<first <prev 12 of 18 next> last>>
Feb 14, 2022 20:32:08   #
blawsr Loc: Virginia
 
elliott937 wrote:
I am simply very curious to learn from my fellow members ... how many enjoy post-processing as much as taking the picture snap? Post-processing ... like a lot? Post-processing ... don't like it at all?


I only post process when I see the need to improve the color saturation or crop a picture to get the effect I desire. I also like being able to experiment.

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 21:22:10   #
photoman022 Loc: Manchester CT USA
 
I actually enjoy post processing. I shoot in RAW, so post processing is a necessity. There was a time when I was a SOC (and JPEG) guy, but I wanted to control my photos and bring the details out in my photos.

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 22:05:10   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
Mac wrote:
I don’t care for post processing. I am planning on switching from shooting RAW to JPG to cut back on computer time.


Wonderful

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2022 22:09:24   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
twosummers wrote:
I shoot in RAW so everything is post-processed


I shoot in jpeg and everything is post processed

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 22:22:40   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
Lucian wrote:
This was another one I created. I took the photo in the living room then cut my daughter out and created an all-new fantasy scene, she loves fairies. I also had to create a new shadow of her body to give it realism, on the bottom right side of her body. When all was done, I added a crackled top overlay to make it seem like an old canvas. Again, this was made up of many, many layers.

I take photos of all sorts of strange things, to keep as bits that I may one day use to create a fantasy image. Things like tree bark, floor textures, wall textures, torn paper etc. and then I take pieces out of photos I may have taken in the past, such as the distance forest line, or a clump of grass, or small group of little flowers. All to keep on file to pull out at some future time, to create a fantasy scene.

I must say that this is one of my most favourite images. We have a large canvas print of it on the wall.
This was another one I created. I took the photo i... (show quote)


So what do you tell people it is? It’s not a photo I guess some type of art

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 22:27:38   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
Lucian wrote:
This is another example and this had about 20 layers blended together. My children wanted to make a snow man, late in the season. We did not have much snow, so after trying to make a traditional snowman, we had to settle for a clump of snow, which was all that we could gather from the sparsely spread about snow in the yard.

I suggest that we make this into a snow woman instead and then my daughter wanted her to have a baby snowman, so we just had enough to make that before we ran out of useable snow. It looked terrible with all the bare grass about, so later I began to create a winter scene in which to place the snow woman and baby and the children. This one took a while, but I had great pleasure in creating everything in all the layers.

As an example, the fence was one layer, then the scraggly tree behind it was another layer, then the house was another layer, as was the larger tree by the house. Then the trees on the left were several individual layers and reindeer and sled another. The pathway that goes off behind the snow woman and the trees behind the house were all different layers, plus more.

These are things that I could never have achieved in the old days with film and dark room work. It is this sort of PP work that makes today's technology fun in photography and Post Processing, at least for me. Oh, and it was a lot of effort to learn how to do all this in Photoshop, but for me, time well worth invested.
This is another example and this had about 20 laye... (show quote)


I don’t understand why people take so many photos. All one has to do is take 20 photos forever one of family one of sports and outdoors and a handful of others then just add 150 layers and you can have anything you want

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 22:32:13   #
srt101fan
 
davyboy wrote:
So what do you tell people it is? It’s not a photo I guess some type of art


Does it really matter what you call it?

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2022 22:40:37   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Strodav wrote:
The camera does not capture what the brain sees through your eyes. It is only an approximation with differences in dynamic range, color reproduction, detail, sharpness, contrast, local adaptation, ... Why not bring your captured images closer to what you actually see? There is just as much science and art in Post Processing as there is in capturing an image. Being able to enhance an image without making it look over processed takes skill, knowledge and the eye of an artist. The Post Processing tools and training are readily available to any photographer who wants them. Why not use them?
The camera does not capture what the brain sees th... (show quote)


It seems many photographers like to process their images such that they look more like a fantasy or idealized version of what they actually saw. This is especially true with landscape and portrait photography.

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 23:13:26   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
Nickaroo wrote:
I truly can relate to your views, as Post-Processing does make the image turn into a Photograph and not just a snap shot. When I started High School my Parents gave me a Type Writer where the keys were in Hebrew. They told me that one day as I got pretty good at typing, that it would become an extension of how to convey a message. I cannot say that I hate Post-Processing as it just comes with the territory. I used the DarkRoom during High School, but I also got banned from using it unless their was a Teacher nearby. I got caught with this girl in the Darkroom and we were developing, except it was a different kind of Retouching, and our parents were pretty mad but I have to say that it was fun.
I truly can relate to your views, as Post-Processi... (show quote)

So that’s what qualifies as a photo post processing No processing is a snapshot. What’s azoic then?

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 23:14:10   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
davyboy wrote:
So that’s what qualifies as a photo post processing No processing is a snapshot. What’s azoic then?
oops what’s a pic then

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 23:27:39   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
rook2c4 wrote:
It seems many photographers like to process their images such that they look more like a fantasy or idealized version of what they actually saw. This is especially true with landscape and portrait photography.


Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Reply
 
 
Feb 14, 2022 23:36:19   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
If it is a special photo I enjoy the challenge. If it's a big shoot it can be a tedious PIA. Kind of like opening a fortune cookie when you shoot raw. You never know what the fortune is until you crack the cookie. :)

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 23:44:05   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
srt101fan wrote:
Does it really matter what you call it?


Well ya hate to have a young person look at your what ever you call lt and say wow I want to take a pic like that but in reality he can’t. He has to add a moon remove a fence and dodge and burn plus add 100 layers

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 23:55:49   #
srt101fan
 
davyboy wrote:
Well ya hate to have a young person look at your what ever you call lt and say wow I want to take a pic like that but in reality he can’t. He has to add a moon remove a fence and dodge and burn plus add 100 layers


I think any young person seriously interested in photography will be able to tell when a photograph has been manipulated to the extent you describe. They can then decide if they want to learn how to do that or stick with more conventional photography. Or maybe do a little of each.

Reply
Feb 14, 2022 23:59:19   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
davyboy wrote:
Well ya hate to have a young person look at your what ever you call lt and say wow I want to take a pic like that but in reality he can’t. He has to add a moon remove a fence and dodge and burn plus add 100 layers


I'm sure most young people today would realize it didn't come out of the camera that way.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 12 of 18 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.