Fotoartist wrote:
What other entire states do you disparage in your infinite intelligence?
Well, not the entire state of Texas. There are normal people in Austin.
Then again there's Michigan. There's a real cesspool.
Oh wait. I'm sorry, that's where you live, isn't it?
The ancient Greeks observed that the laws make criminals. Here we have the topsy-turvy application of this view. The homeowner becomes complicit in crime for failure to accommodate the actions of intruders violating the sanctuary of his home.
The rationale for this outlandish scenario relies on this notion: "On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth."
This dynamic serves the doctrine of Egalitarianism wherein all enjoy equal social, economic, and political rights (sameness). All have enough, and nobody has more than another.
This outcome lies one step away from the extreme socialism known as Marxism with its leveling effect.
Checkmate wrote:
Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC?
In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home.
Now listen to what she has to say...
"I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed."
Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves.
Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner.
"In most instances, the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburses his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better.
Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC? ... (
show quote)
Frank T wrote:
Why would you expect anyone from Texas to have a working brain?
Where do you live, Frankie? Ashamed of it, huh?
Architect1776 wrote:
Her siblings.
Oh Arch, you are sooooo funny. NOT.
Congresswoman Eleanor Holmes from DC is pretty stupid and is a lousy driver to boot. She's a big Biden cheerleader and is one of the biggest proponents of the current voting rights bill. I guess old, incompetent people need to stick together.
Remember this? This video of her parking is from 6 years ago and she's still in congress. Of course Amtrak Joe is rumored to be a horrendous driver as well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ym-kk1tRw
anotherview wrote:
The ancient Greeks observed that the laws make criminals. Here we have the topsy-turvy application of this view. The homeowner becomes complicit in crime for failure to accommodate the actions of intruders violating the sanctuary of his home.
The rationale for this outlandish scenario relies on this notion: "On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth."
This dynamic serves the doctrine of Egalitarianism wherein all enjoy equal social, economic, and political rights (sameness). All have enough, and nobody has more than another.
This outcome lies one step away from the extreme socialism known as Marxism with its leveling effect.
The ancient Greeks observed that the laws make cri... (
show quote)
Socialism is communism for slow learners.
Checkmate wrote:
Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC?
In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home.
While Meza did introduce HB196 to *amend* the Castle Doctrine, that article completely misrepresents the changes proposed, and the quotes attributed to her were made up.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-terry-meza-castle-doctrine-idUSKBN28L1ZBQuote:
Vince Leibowitz, Chief of Staff for Meza, told Reuters via email: “These quotes are 100 percent FALSE and completely fabricated. Rep. Meza NEVER said any of these things.”
So, once again, the right proves that only way it can make a point --- is by telling lies about the left.
LDB415
Loc: Houston south suburb
Did she say those words? No. Did she mean those points? Yes. She just frames it differently. But the underlying points are what is presented, albeit in a manner that more emphatically presents them. Typical dumber than dirt leftist moron.
Blurryeyed wrote:
So says the joker from Gotham.
So says the joke from Gotham. I fixed it for ya
dlwhawaii wrote:
Yes it is.
She wasn't a protestor, she was an insurrectionist attempting a coup.
Good shooting.
LDB415 wrote:
Did she say those words? No. Did she mean those points? Yes. She just frames it differently. But the underlying points are what is presented, albeit in a manner that more emphatically presents them. Typical dumber than dirt leftist moron.
So, if I claim Trump said "Storm the Capitol, stop the voting, and install me as emperor", it's OK, because while he didn't "say" those words, he "meant" those points?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.