boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

[quote=Shutterbug1697][quote=boberic]I'll play your game. Here are a few examples of how the voting rights bill can negatively change elections.

The voting rights bill is designed to gaurantee a one (democrat party) party rule. Seems like that's what's happening all across the country in GOP run states with gerrymandered maps dividing up minority districts to reduce their voices at the polls.
At least some State Supreme Courts have ruled those gerrymandered maps as unconstitutional.

That party can then pass any law they want. That's exactly what is happening in GOP run states!

...

Pack the Supreme Court. #MoscowMitch already did that with 3 trump appointments!

...

YES these are very extreme and unlikely things. These things are ALREADY happening! ...[/quote
See my inserted comments.[/quote]
These things are NOT happening. There is NO republican voting rights bill. Republicans do not want to federalize voting. Just what planet do you inhabit?
>

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

There is NO voter suppression. No matter where the ballot boxes are located anybody is able to drive there or get there somehow and deposit their vote. Why is it you on the left always pull out some bullshit saying minorities are not able to vote? What does anybody's color matter when it is a simple fact of filling out a ballot, driving or sending it in to a ballot location to be counted. Tell me how that affects ONLY black, Hispanic or any other voter color. This is America. If anyone wants to vote then they have that ability to do so. If minority voters are unable to vote for some reason how is it that whites and other races are still able to vote? There are poor white people just like poor people of color and yet you on the lying corrupt Left ONLY ever bring up black people.

Seems as if black people are a hell of a lot smarter than you Democrats. They seem to vote when they want to just as I do. STOP the Democratic Plantation. Let the Black people GO.

Dennis

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

The Democrat party is the party of condescending racist pigs.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

[quote=Shutterbug1697][quote=boberic]I'll play your game. Here are a few examples of how the voting rights bill can negatively change elections.

The voting rights bill is designed to gaurantee a one (democrat party) party rule. Seems like that's what's happening all across the country in GOP run states with gerrymandered maps dividing up minority districts to reduce their voices at the polls.
At least some State Supreme Courts have ruled those gerrymandered maps as unconstitutional.

That party can then pass any law they want. That's exactly what is happening in GOP run states!

...

Pack the Supreme Court. #MoscowMitch already did that with 3 trump appointments!

...

YES these are very extreme and unlikely things. These things are ALREADY happening! ...[/quote
See my inserted comments.[/quote]

Mitch McConnell has nothing to do with SCOTUS appointees. That is the job of the President. Trump won the election and three vacancies came up. Are you really trying to tell us that if Hillary won the election and those same three vacancies came up, that she would have filled any of them with a Conservative Justice? REALLY??? Yet you seem to blame Trump for something any of you would have done exactly the same for your own party.

Have any of those three Justices done anything to go against the Constitution? I know at least on one occasion some voted against Trump. Isn't that what a SCOTUS Justice is supposed to do, promote a decision based upon the Constitution as written?

Are you for America OR are you for the Democratic Party. Hell of a difference you know. You also should know, Trump is no longer the President. That position was filled by a POS, Joe Biden.

Dennis

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Actually, the first of the "trump" appointees should have been an Obama appointee!

The 11 GOP Nembers of the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a letter to #MoscowMitch.

They decided to change the rules about when a President can submit a nomination for SCOTUS and have the nominee sit for their nomination hearings.

Instead of pushing to quickly fill the open seat, #MoscowMitch decided to hold open the seat for almost 14 months after Antonin Scalia died on February 13, 2016, until Neil Gorsuch was confirmed on April 7, 2017!

Based on the Senate Judiciary Committee and #MoscowMitch changing the rules for the open seat on SCOTUS in 2016, the 3rd trump appointee should never have happened.

When Ruth Bader Ginsberg died on September 18, 2020, with only 46 days until the election, Amy Coney Barrett should NEVER been confirmed.

So in fact #MoscowMitch DID pack the court!

There should have only been a single trump SCOTUS appointee.

It was #MoscowMitch who who chose to placate trump with 3 SCOTUS appointees in four years.

The only modern president with more than 3 SCOTUS appointees in a single term is trump. Reagan and Nixon both had four, but they both served part or all of two terms. Then you have to go back to Eisenhower who had 5 appointees.

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/nominations/SupremeCourtNominations1789present.htm

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Oh stop your incessant bio**ng and whining, Democrats would have taken the same measure if it they were in power. So sit down and keep your mouth shut.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

You little pipsqueak Democrats have been whining and bitching about that for years now. Get over yourselves. If Trump not had the right to appoint who he wanted then he would not have done that. There is no taking turns, first Democrats and then Republicans with regard to appointing SCOTUS Justices. We all know that. As I pointed out Hillary, if elected President would have done exactly as Trump did. If she could have possibly appointed a fourth Justice she would have done that too and you would have applauded her for doing do. Trump did nothing any Democrat would not have done and you know it.

Dennis

Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast

Scalia died while President Obama was still in office.

President Obama had the right, with nearly 11 months left in his term to appoint a replacement for Scalia to SCOTUS.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Seems to me Sleazy Harry Reid changed the rules a couple of times regarding the Fillibuster and the Nuclear Option, did he not? I don't recall you whining and bitching back then about how it screwed over the Republicans. But I do recall somewhat when Harry Reid whined and cried, Schumer TOO, when later on the Republicans turned the tables and did exactly what Reid had done. Do you remember those thrilling days of political yesteryear when the Democrats could dish it out but not take it when the very same thing came back into their faces?

If the Democratic Party was not able to Stick It to President Trump and he won that bout it seems the Democratic Party needed to up their game as he was too much for them right up until they became corrupt and impeached him and are now doing all they can to keep him from running again. As I think Blurry pointed out, he may not vote for Trump in the primaries but if Trump comes up in the 2024 elections you can bet your ass I will wholeheartedly vote for him. After seeing the absolute disaster of the Biden Presidency, I guarantee (oh, please learn to spell guarantee) millions of others will vote for Trump as well and that includes a number of Democrats.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

How many years back was that. Shit happens on both sides of the political aisle and yet you are still whining about something happening years ago. Move On Shutterfly. As I pointed out Harry Reid screwed over the Republicans several times and yet I don't see any Republicans whining and bitching about it now. All I see is Chuck Schumer whining and crying he can't get his way. Once again, get over yourself. Grow up.

Have a wonderful day too,

Dennis