The James Webb telescope will launch soon.
I definitely have all my fingers and toes crossed. I wish it was going up on spacxex rocket instead of an arianne for safety reasons, but I understand the monetary reasoning for this pairing.
Go Baby Go!!!
Let's HOPE all goes well
&
It never needs to be repaired!!!
I hope everything works as planned.
davidrb
Loc: Half way there on the 45th Parallel
Hope it has been thoroughly tested BEFORE it is launched. Hubble was put in orbit before the problems involving its mirror were known. Nasanauts had to replace the faulty component before the thing worked properly. That might have been fixed more easily had the problem been discovered before launch. There will be great rewards when this eye looks at the beginning of time. Astrophysisists are giddy with anticipation.
BassmanBruce wrote:
I definitely have all my fingers and toes crossed. I wish it was going up on spacxex rocket instead of an arianne for safety reasons, but I understand the monetary reasoning for this pairing.
Go Baby Go!!!
Arianne rockets are pretty reliable.
davidrb wrote:
Hope it has been thoroughly tested BEFORE it is launched. Hubble was put in orbit before the problems involving its mirror were known. Nasanauts had to replace the faulty component before the thing worked properly. That might have been fixed more easily had the problem been discovered before launch. There will be great rewards when this eye looks at the beginning of time. Astrophysisists are giddy with anticipation.
The Hubble story was a great lesson. As I understand it, a mirror is ground and meanwhile checked with a special instrument that precisely measures the curvature. It came out perfect,
but that
instrument had a tiny flaw -- a speck of paint that misaligned it by a very small amount. So the mirror was ground to be precisely wrong.
No one thought to check the instrument that was doing the checking.
There is a deep psychic memory about that debacle.
Here's a thought...The best government project can be reduced by a part provided by the lowest bid contract.
Mark Sturtevant wrote:
The Hubble story was a great lesson. < snip >
For some perspective - the story I remember about the scale of the flaw is that if the Hubble mirror was supposed to be absolutely flat and was big enough to cover the US from Maine to California, the flaw was the equivalent of something like a 1 inch diameter rock sitting in the middle of Kansas.
Luckily, some very bright people figured out a way to compensate for the flaw, and the telescope itself was within reach of the Space Shuttle which could deliver the parts and technicians to fix it. That won't be possible for the Webb telescope - it will be parked at Lagrange point 2 which is about 1.5 million kilometers from Earth, permanently in Earth's shadow from the Sun. So Webb has to work perfectly the first time, and every time thereafter. I've read elsewhere that there are something like 300 different points of failure, any one of which can kill the thing.
So there are some pretty tight sphincters around the world right now. Unfortunately, it will take months of setup and testing after the launch, even if everything seems to go perfectly, to see whether the captured data will actually live up to the design parameters. Let's all hope the years of design, testing and retesting will pay off, because what they expect to get from Webb will be really spectacular.
My hopes are with the TMT in Hawaii. Much more serviceable and cost effective. However they still have the local naysayers to deal with.
BBurns
Loc: South Bay, California
bwana
Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
Already old technology being launched and still a long way from operational; successful launch, successful positioning, successful unfolding, successful communications, etc. Still a lot of uncertainties...
bwa
bwana wrote:
Already old technology being launched and still a long way from operational; successful launch, successful positioning, successful unfolding, successful communications, etc. Still a lot of uncertainties...
bwa
Unfortunately, that's the world in which we conduct scientific experiments in space.
However, if Webb delivers anything equal to, or just above, that which has been delivered by Hubble, I will be happy.
After Hubble started delivering images, and those were posted to the public, I was absolutely awestruck at the images. If someone had told me to draw a picture of "Gaseous Pillars in M16", I'd have no idea where to begin. Granted, there are some estimations and image adjustments, but the sheer beauty of the images is amazing.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.