Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
B&W - what do we really see?
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
Dec 16, 2021 10:07:15   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
When looking at a flower photo, the viewer tends to first be attracted to the color and then to the areas in the photo that are in focus. Black and White photography focuses on the details and composition of the object, such as these flowers on B&W film:

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-715966-1.html



Reply
Dec 16, 2021 10:25:23   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
mwsilvers wrote:
When I look at black and white photos I do not "see" or imagine colors. What I see is line, form, shape, texture, tonality, shadow and contrast, but not red, green, and blue. I don't care what the "real" colors are. B&W often allows me to see and appreciate greater amounts of detail without the distraction of color. Viewing a well done monochrome image is a very different visual and visceral experience than viewing the same image in color and can have a stronger dramatic impact on my emotions than a color version could. I find that some images work better in color, some work equally well in color and B&W, and others give superior results when shot in B&W.
When I look at black and white photos I do not &qu... (show quote)




I totally agree with this assessment. The absence of chroma information in a scene renders the image differently. It can change the mood, the perceived emphasis on various objects, and more.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 10:28:58   #
lamiaceae Loc: San Luis Obispo County, CA
 
Delderby wrote:
Following Selmslie’s topic today (Thu16th) re Sunny 16, he posted a very nice lakeside color pic, and included a B&W version. But in B&W what do we really see, and what do we imagine? When we view B&W do we see the black skies or the black water in the lake - or grass in the same dreary black and grey? - I don’t think so – what we see is what we imagine - i.e. blue skies and blue water and green grass. But we cannot correctly imagine the tones and more subtle colors of the day – e.g. is the Acer tree green or has it turned to it's Autumn red?
Following Selmslie’s topic today (Thu16th) re Sunn... (show quote)


I still can think and shoot in B&W as I have since 1977. I love B&W images. I really only liked doing color once I switched Digital and even now I still shoot some subjects with the intent of converting them to B&W. RAW color via ARC and Ps to B&W.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2021 10:32:23   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
mwsilvers wrote:
When I look at black and white photos I do not "see" or imagine colors. What I see is line, form, shape, texture, tonality, shadow and contrast, but not red, green, and blue. I don't care what the "real" colors are. B&W often allows me to see and appreciate greater amounts of detail without the distraction of color. Viewing a well done monochrome image is a very different visual and visceral experience than viewing the same image in color and can have a stronger dramatic impact on my emotions than a color version could. I find that some images work better in color, some work equally well in color and B&W, and others give superior results when shot in B&W.
When I look at black and white photos I do not &qu... (show quote)


Well said.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 10:39:13   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
lamiaceae wrote:
I still can think and shoot in B&W as I have since 1977. I love B&W images. I really only liked doing color once I switched Digital and even now I still shoot some subjects with the intent of converting them to B&W. RAW color via ARC and Ps to B&W.


Color film required special tools and special skills to capture accurately. I used lots of 'chrome (slide) films. I had a bag full of color correction filters to adjust white balance under different lighting conditions. Raw capture and post processing digital images is much more satisfying.

B&W images can be altered via Photoshop's new Neural Filters to create false color results. For example, her skin and hair are close to reality, but the ground behind her is really dead brown leaves and her shirt is green and white, not charcoal and white:


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 10:46:01   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Unfortunately(?), when I see black and white, I see black and white. Seeing anything else would defeat the purpose of the photographer.


Does that really mean that you see the purpose of B&W photographers is to make black skies, grey trees, dark and threatening waters, grey people, all birds looking like magpies and a grey Santa?

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 10:50:41   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
mwsilvers wrote:
That assumes that the presence of color is necessary for an image to evoke an emotional response, which is untrue as countless numbers of people can attest to. Often a B&W image can evoke a much stronger emotional response then a full color version of the same image.


Black and white and shades of grey as far as I’m concerned are parts of the color palette and deserve the same level of consideration as do the rest of the colors.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2021 11:14:19   #
Thomas902 Loc: Washington DC
 
Delderby since you are located in the UK surely you've seen Kate Moss showcasing David Yurman's fine jewelry...
It's all about the genre in which you work... And the client's visual statement...

Clients demand that their "Branding" a.k.a. visual statement be honored...
Typically on high end commercial gigs is not up to the photographer to decide what medium...
But rather the client's art director...

My question to you Delderby is on how many assignments have you had the honor, privilege and pleasure to work with a client's art director?

Wish all a wonderful holiday season with family and friends...

Kate Moss for David Yurman.
Kate Moss for David Yurman....

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 11:19:32   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Delderby wrote:
Does that really mean that you see the purpose of B&W photographers is to make black skies, grey trees, dark and threatening waters, grey people, all birds looking like magpies and a grey Santa?


The difficulty you're having understanding black and white photography seems to be your a result of your attempt to mentally translate those images into color. That is not only futile but defeats the purpose of a black and white image.

When we look at a B&W image what we are seeing are different tonalities, different textures, shapes contrast, a greater focus on details, etc. The very first thing we see when we look at a color image is the color. That color can, and does, often distract from other elements of an image.

With good B&W images one can often see things and feel emotions that are not easily seen or felt in a color version.

A few years back somebody posted a color and B&W version of a photograph of a native American man in profile wearing ceremonial war paint. Some people prefered the color version and some others the black and white version. They both had value, but the color version was more decorative showing the bright colors of the paint against his sun baked skin. The B&W version, however, without the distraction of those bright colors, highlighted his piercing eyes as he looked off to the distance, which made me wonder what he was thinking at that moment. The impact of his eyes was not evident in the color version without having to work at seeing it. It was just a colorful and attractive well composed image, but nothing more than that. It conveyed no emotion..

Keep in mind that good black and white is not just desaturated color. It can take a lot of effort manipulating color channels, contrast, shadows and highlights, and sharpening to achieve a compelling image.

The great portrait photographers of the 40s 50s 60s, and 70s and even today, chose to capture their subjects in B&W rather than color because their goal was to capture the essence of the person they were photographing, without color getting in the way.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 11:35:39   #
Delderby Loc: Derby UK
 
dennis2146 wrote:
With all due respect I love your post, especially since you are on record from a couple of days ago saying you did not like black and white photos. I can respect that. Many people do not. But some of us do, a great many of us like black and white photos. When done well, a goal that often eludes me, they are more demonstrative of what is going on, more demonstrative of the differences in light and shadow that color photos sometimes just cannot get across. A pure white cloud over a shadowed landscape as submitted by someone like member, Bob Malarz, or an approaching storm can look much more dramatic in black and white than in color.

Let's not forget that landscapes look great to many people because of the color. Take the color from many sunsets and sunrises and you do not have such a great photo. The color is what makes the photo in many cases. For me that is the truth. But a dynamic powerful sunrise or sunset in black and white displays another type of photograph where color does not matter.

I won't drag this out any farther. You like color photos. I like color AND black and white. Surely there is room for both types in our photography world.

Dennis
With all due respect I love your post, especially ... (show quote)


Yes - there is certainly room for both. It is good to discuss points of view, likes and dislikes - and get to know each other a little better.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 12:19:17   #
User ID
 
Delderby wrote:
Following Selmslie’s topic today (Thu16th) re Sunny 16, he posted a very nice lakeside color pic, and included a B&W version. But in B&W what do we really see, and what do we imagine? When we view B&W do we see the black skies or the black water in the lake - or grass in the same dreary black and grey? - I don’t think so – what we see is what we imagine - i.e. blue skies and blue water and green grass. But we cannot correctly imagine the tones and more subtle colors of the day – e.g. is the Acer tree green or has it turned to it's Autumn red?
Following Selmslie’s topic today (Thu16th) re Sunn... (show quote)

That is NOTHING like what I see. I see what is presented pretty much just as it is presented.

If I view a pencil sketch I see line and suggestions of form. A BW photo is a more elaborate version of a pencil sketch.

I don’t bring outside concepts into the frame. IOW when I view BW I’m similar to anyone toadally color blind full time, someone living in a grayscale world.

Your post suggests to me that you have little or no BW vision. Perhaps you see photos as “windows on reality” ? As someone who creates imagery from a blank canvas, I see all photos as stuff inserted into a blank space to create what will be offered to the viewer. The UHH concept of a photo as a “capture” is quite alien to me.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Using a single line I drew an album cover rendering of Brenna, a singer. I drew without a model or photo. Brenna’s mom asked if she could have a copy of “the photo”. The ultra simple line rendering was so true to Brenna’s “presence” that her mom assumed it was distilled from a photo. I greatly suspect that you and Brenna’s mom share a similar way of viewing images. Maybe thaz extremely common, but I don’t see like that at all. Therefor I photograph for a very small narrow audience.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2021 12:38:35   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
There are all kinds of discussions where folks philosophize about black and white photography as opposed to colour. Some say that black and white is more "artistic, challenging, dramatic, requires more skill, etc, etc, etc. Others have a diametrically opposite view. Myself? I love both! Each has its attributes, technical challenges and it is a matter of fitting the medium to the concept.

I won't argue for one or the other but I do have some practical advice about previsualizing in monochrome. Of, course, if your camera has a monochrome setting in the menu that allows you to assess a scene or a subject in monochrome, you are good to go. If it does not have the feature you can use an old director of photography trick. On a movie set, the D.O.P. has a viewfinder that replicates the camera's aspect ratio and can simulate various focal lengths. If you add a dark green filter, such as the Wratten X1 you will get a somewhat more monochromatic view. If you have or can obtain such a filter, simply view the subject through the filter.

I can envision or imagine a black and white version of colourful scenes and subjects- things such as dramatic skyscapes, and the effect of certain coloured filters on various colours. This is not because I can magically see in black and white. It's just by reading the literature and experience, I can imagine or plan what is gonna result. After years of black and white film photography, I am familiar with shifting the panchromatic rendition of various colours.

It is the old example- you shoot a red apple against a blue background and of course, the opposite colours will enable ample visual contrast. You may, however, find that in black and white both the apple and background will register as the same or nearly the same tone of gray and thereby negating sufficient tonal contrast and separation. So, I have a choice- use a red filter to light the apple and darken the background or use a blue filter to lighten the background and take the apple. You can then see which approach seems more natural. In a portrait, you can use a green filter to create a more dramatic- darker and more robust skin tone and stimulate the old orthochromatic film effect. Problem is, with a female subject, you may end up with BLACK lipstick. If the subject has greenish eyes, the may come up as WHITE- weird!

Having written all of the aforementioned, this is why I lie to shoot black and white in monochrome mode, in the camera, so I assess and apply some of these techniques and make any corrections on the spot. Of course, I can shoot in colour and do the converse in post-processing, but I fie this method more precise as to exact previsualization.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 12:54:48   #
User ID
 
dennis2146 wrote:
I may be wrong. I was once about 70 years ago, ONCE. But perhaps his comment included black and white as colors. I believe they are.

Dennis


Black, gray and white are not in any way colors. They are an absence of color, not merely by geek tech definition but also functionally in terms of information and /or emotion conveyed. Same goes for a color-toned monochrome image (sepia, selenium, etc).

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 13:03:54   #
User ID
 
mwsilvers wrote:
I never look at B&W and "think" colors. Color is completely unimportant in a good B&W image. That is a concept that some people are apparently unable to grasp.

Huuuuuuuuuuumongous AMEN.

Reply
Dec 16, 2021 13:14:01   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
What is black and white and red all over?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 13 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.