thom w wrote:
Like on Hannity and Colmes, where it was obviously Hannity's show and Colmes was a stooge? Why don't we wait and see what transpires before judging how CNN treats him. Hell, Cuomo tried to be balanced to the point that if someone was on his show and spoke of the earth being a globe, he would have had a flat earther on to counter him. That is way beyond fair. That is absurd. Fair and balanced isn't supposed to mean you give equal weight to opinions of lunatics.
Right. Cuomo was so fair that he tried to dig up dirt on his brothers accusers to discredit them and spent a great deal of time on the air lying to try to make his brother look innocent. If that's your idea of balanced that explains a lot.
But, I'm happy to see that you agree that we shouldn't give equal weight to lunatics such as Cuomo. As far as Hannity and Colmes, is it Fox's fault that Colmes wasn't as smart and forceful as Hannity? Fox has a much more diverse group of news people than CNN or MSNBC do. What liberals don't seem to be able to do is to separate the news people from the commentators. The two are not the same. Hannity is not news. Tucker Carlson is not news. Just like Rachel Maddow is not news nor was Cuomo.
Wallace was news. We will see what he is at CNN. The object is to be fair and balanced on the news. The other shows can be whatever they want.