Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Does the cost of your camera influence your photo behavior?
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
Dec 1, 2021 21:59:01   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. The fearful are caught as often as the bold.

Reply
Dec 1, 2021 22:02:07   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. The fearful are caught as often as the bold.


Do you know how pathetic your cut rate zen is? Apparently not, and you have a fan here and there. How about elsewhere.

Reply
Dec 1, 2021 22:09:02   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
quixdraw wrote:
Do you know how pathetic your cut rate zen is? Apparently not, and you have a fan here and there. How about elsewhere.


Another fan!! WooYoo. Sorry, the recent run has exhausted all the club paraphernal of hats and T's....

Reply
 
 
Dec 1, 2021 22:19:01   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
Chicago, the best thing I ever pulled off was getting a fast transfer out after being placed there. That was when it still retained a frisson of Carl Sandburg's poem. A reminder to never annoy anyone in personnel. I am thankful every day still.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 04:26:11   #
mundy-F2 Loc: Chicago suburban area
 
quixdraw wrote:
Having a phone talk with my oldest friend this morning. He has switched from Very Expensive cameras to mid price range and also smaller camera size. He has been greatly enjoying the change and the photos. The phrase that stood out "I wish I had done it years ago, I think I would have gotten a lot more pictures." His point, though he can afford nearly any camera he wants, is that concerns about loss, damage or theft constrained him from taking photos with the expensive cameras sometimes, but not with a $900+ camera. The most expensive camera I own is a DF, bought new. I've always been careful with gear, but don't recall that kind of feeling. What about you?
Having a phone talk with my oldest friend this mor... (show quote)


I am careful, but use what I purchase. I insure my gear. I usually travel very lite and keep my camera under my coat or jacket, unless I am taking landscapes. My street photography takes me through all different sections of Chicago and usually travel via public transportation.
Mundy

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 12:06:11   #
jtm1943
 
I avoid the crime-ridden big cities like the plague. I served in the Army for 26 years and I've had more than enough of combat zones. I actually felt safer there than in places like Chicago, Portland, New York, Baltimore, St Louis, Kansas City, San Francisco, Los Angeles, etc., etc., etc., and other places that either don't support the law, or that don't support the police - like defund the police, and other stupid stances.. I didn't buy my camera stuff to give it to crooks.

Reply
Dec 2, 2021 13:31:05   #
Hodagman Loc: NH
 
I feel the same - just bought a Nikon P1000 for that reason. The cost fits my use level objective. Tired of reviewing all the details with a full framed camera which I want, the best brand, mirrorless VS traditionally. What's tne beat value in an industry that has seen a 40% drop in sales.

Reply
 
 
Sep 3, 2022 23:44:20   #
Paul Diamond Loc: Atlanta, GA, USA
 
Interesting to see something that I replied to in Dec. 2020 and it is still here! I am a bit more respectful of more expensive camera equipment when potentially exposing it to the realities of the harsh world.

One change is that I am now 'retired' and can't afford to dip into the checking or bank account as freely to replace something as I once did. But, I am careful of my more expensive equipment and do my best to avoid falls, water, etc. I still want the best that I can afford. And, I ask the best that I can expect from the gear that I own.

But, I never thought less of someone that had a goal of the son's football game or daughter's volleyball game, a birthday party, etc. The issue of photography is using it to get what is important for you to get from it. If your needs are simple, the camera/lens should be suitable for that need. (Maybe my thinking is influenced by selling to camera buyers while in college. My goal was to help them satisfy their needs in a camera/lens, not mine.)

Reply
Sep 4, 2022 00:02:27   #
User ID
 
Paul Diamond wrote:
Interesting to see something that I replied to in Dec. 2020 and it is still here! I am a bit more respectful of more expensive camera equipment when potentially exposing it to the realities of the harsh world.

One change is that I am now 'retired' and can't afford to dip into the checking or bank account as freely to replace something as I once did. But, I am careful of my more expensive equipment and do my best to avoid falls, water, etc. I still want the best that I can afford. And, I ask the best that I can expect from the gear that I own.

But, I never thought less of someone that had a goal of the son's football game or daughter's volleyball game, a birthday party, etc. The issue of photography is using it to get what is important for you to get from it. If your needs are simple, the camera/lens should be suitable for that need. (Maybe my thinking is influenced by selling to camera buyers while in college. My goal was to help them satisfy their needs in a camera/lens, not mine.)
Interesting to see something that I replied to in ... (show quote)

STILL ALIVE ??!??! Not reeeeeeeally ...
STILL ALIVE ??!??! Not reeeeeeeally ......
(Download)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.