Dr. Christina Parks, PhD. on mandating COVID vaccines
Dr. Parks testifying in Congress on the efficacy of the vaccine and mandatory vaccines for workers. Very informative.
https://youtu.be/nF4yVDt6RBw
Am I hearing her correctly that my 2 shots are not effective, perhaps detrimental? I do know that every year we take a best guess flu-flu [the regular flu] shot, a tradition like Thanksgiving Turkey. When I got my COVID shots the vaccine was very effective psychologically, making me feel free. But, her listing and commenting on variant statistics are contradictory to what we have been told... Perhaps the statistics are skewed by people like me thinking that my shots allow me to let my guard down??
If we generalize removing the nameplate COVID, does this template fit other viruses and the vaccines we have taken to protect us from smallpox and polio which were wiped out worldwide by vaccination; surely there were variants within the generalized named virus. OH, NO!! Polio is a high mutilator and is still around flaring here and there. If exposed to one of the polio variants, am I more likely to get polio ... what say you Dr. Parks?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-14174-2If my antivaxx neighbor told me he has studied Dr Parks' statics I could respect that, however, he is antivaxx based on FOX News anti-establishment approach that gains high ratings; my neighbor's reasoning I do not respect. Perhaps he is correct for all the wrong reasons.
Is Dr. Parks telling me not to get a COVID booster shot? If the template applies do I not update my Hep-B immunity?
Meanwhile, take Vitamin D and Zinc to boost the immune system. Hope that others wear masks to truncate the virus-laden spray as they cough, I will respect them and do the same.
Zinc... Dr Campbell Australia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIvRR_y5i-k&t=245sMasks... "A cloth mask is intended to trap respiratory droplets that are released when the wearer talks, coughs or sneezes. It also acts as a barrier to protect the wearer from inhaling droplets released by others."
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
Just so you know, she was testifying before Congress. I don’t believe YouTube has video people there when someone is testifying. Once again, Canadian, your reasoning is flawed. No wonder you live in a third world cesspool.
cwp3420 wrote:
Just so you know, she was testifying before Congress. I don’t believe YouTube has video people there when someone is testifying. Once again, Canadian, your reasoning is flawed. No wonder you live in a third world cesspool.
She was testifying in the Michigan House debate of a state bill...not Congress.
Your post and comment are flawed.
While this video of a state hearing (not Congress) was on YouTube, I read that the good doctor herself is banned from YouTube for spreading medical misinformation.
flip1948 wrote:
While this video of a state hearing (not Congress) was on YouTube, I read that the good doctor herself is banned from YouTube for spreading medical misinformation.
Links please. Not that we don’t trust your word, but we don’t trust your word.
cwp3420 wrote:
Links please. Not that we don’t trust your word, but we don’t trust your word.
I don't trust your posts which is why I googled the doctor...you could do the same.
flip1948 wrote:
I don't trust your posts which is why I googled the doctor...you could do the same.
You claimed it. Prove it. Why should I have to do the work you’ve already done, unless you’re lying your ass off again.
cwp3420 wrote:
You claimed it. Prove it. Why should I have to do the work you’ve already done, unless you’re lying your ass off again.
Me...lying my ass off? You were the one who claimed the doctor was testifying before Congress when it was the Michigan legislature.
The tipoff that you were full of it was at the beginning of your YouTube video when one of the speakers said, " ...here in Michigan". The rest was easy.
You prove what you said was true...you can't because it was a crock.
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
Well, her whole point is based on a false premise, that the purpose of the vaccine is to prevent transmission. You CAN still contract COVID and transmit COVID after getting the vaccine. You are less likely to do so, however, and will shed fewer virus particles for a shorter period of time if you have been vaccinated. In addition, as has been shown in multiple studies, you are much less likely to be hospitalized and die. That would make the vaccine pretty effective. And the major point of the vaccine is to prevent death - this virus has killed over one of every 400 adults in the US.
Personal choice? Your "personal choice" to get drunk and drive has been restricted by the government. Your personal choice to shout "fire" in a crowded theater has been restricted by the government. Your personal choice to own a fully automatic weapon has been greatly limited by the government. Oh, yes - your choice to attend public school without being vaccinated has been restricted by the government.
flip1948 wrote:
While this video of a state hearing (not Congress) was on YouTube, I read that the good doctor herself is banned from YouTube for spreading medical misinformation.
That doesn't mean anything because You Tube is banning anyone who says something that goes against the CDC and Fauci regardless of the merit of what the individual is saying.
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
cwp3420 wrote:
Just so you know, she was testifying before Congress. I don’t believe YouTube has video people there when someone is testifying. Once again, Canadian, your reasoning is flawed. No wonder you live in a third world cesspool.
YouTube has no “video people”.. it is a public forum for others to post their videos.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.