Mac wrote:
I have always thought of a walk around lens as a compact, light weight, general purpose lens to carry on strolls and take on picnics, etc. Something like 24-85mm or 28-105mm.
Lately I’ve seen recommendations like 18-400mm or 28-300mm which strikes me as overkill for a walk. They seem to me more like one size fits all lenses.
Is there a consensus on what makes a good walk around lens?
First of all, there is no such thing as a walk around lens. And lens you currently have on the camera and walk around with is a walk around lens.
Second, the lens you choose to walk around with can constantly change. For instance, when I am in Florida Wetlands, my walk around lens is a Sony 600mm f4, this lens is not front heavy because most of the lenses are middle back, and at 6 lbs. it balances nicely on my Sony a9 with vertical grip.
If I am shooting a parade my lenses to walk around with is the Nikon 70-200 FL. If I am shooting landscape my walk around lens is my Nikon 16-35 f4 or my Nikon 24-120 f4.
Folks will recommend any lens as a walk around lens, Webster does not have a definition for it yet but I am sure they will soon.
Bottom line, a walk about lens is a personal choice, it is what you want to carry around with you as you shoot images you wish to capture. It is a personal choice, not one that is made for you by some one else. The choice for a walk around lens is yours to make. So make it already and get out there and shoot.
Always remember, do not let others make decisions for you, your parents made them for you when you were young, but now supposedly, you are an adult, and you can make decisions based on your life experiences.
Good luck and keep on shooting until the end.