What Is A Walk Around Lens?
May 29, 2022 11:16:53 #
MDI Mainer wrote:
In any event this post has been walking around for nine months. 
Yes! and it finally gave birth!
I should pay more attention to the datelines. Thing is, sometimes, miraculously, the dead threads are somehow resurrected. Oftentimes, a new thread arises with a "hot topic" or question and garners many responses, debates and outright combat, but the OP never comes back to respond, thank all the participants, or disagree- it's anticlimactic. Can't win!
Sometimes the zombies can be fun! At least, this one is not about the "infamous" skylight filters, the dreaded post-processing, or the popular "how do I clean my lens"? On that last question, I am tempted to answer "steel wool and hydrofluoric acid" but I am afraid someone would actually do that!
May 29, 2022 11:23:43 #
kmielen
Loc: Eastern NC
Mac wrote:
I was surprised to see it revived.
Perhaps the admin could "lock" topics (threads) for new comments after an arbitrary amount of time, say 30 days. Or at least create a warning that you are about to reply to an old topic?
May 29, 2022 17:54:02 #
When my wife and I go for a walk around a state park she takes her 400 f4 DO with a 2x and I take my 300 2.8 with a 2x.
I think you have to define where you are walking around before you decide on the lens to walk around with.
I think you have to define where you are walking around before you decide on the lens to walk around with.
May 29, 2022 18:36:26 #
Mac wrote:
I was surprised to see it revived.
I revived it. Seems there is still life in some of these dormant posts. After all, just because something was talked about a year ago doesn't mean there isn't something that can't be added.
May 29, 2022 18:41:50 #
May 29, 2022 19:44:38 #
graybeard wrote:
I revived it. Seems there is still life in some of these dormant posts. After all, just because something was talked about a year ago doesn't mean there isn't something that can't be added.
What was added to the revival that wasn’t said during the original run?
I think you are nothing but a troll trying to stir things up.
May 29, 2022 20:21:38 #
Mac wrote:
What was added to the revival that wasn’t said during the original run?
I think you are nothing but a troll trying to stir things up.
I think you are nothing but a troll trying to stir things up.
shame shame on you lie like that you don't and ever will know s@@@
May 29, 2022 20:50:26 #
William wrote:
shame shame on you lie like that you don't and ever will know s@@@
What did I lie about?
May 29, 2022 21:35:58 #
May 29, 2022 21:44:29 #
May 29, 2022 21:49:03 #
Delderby wrote:
Surely a walk around lens should go with a walk around camera - how about a Panasonic G3 or G5 with a 14-42 PZ (power zoom) X series pancake lens? 
Lumix G3 or G5 is waaaaaaaay too huge. All of the same mu4/3 lenses fit the GM5. About $500 wherever fine relics are sold !
(Download)
May 29, 2022 21:53:49 #
May 29, 2022 21:57:42 #
May 29, 2022 22:02:18 #
jim quist wrote:
When my wife and I go for a walk around a state park she takes her 400 f4 DO with a 2x and I take my 300 2.8 with a 2x.
I think you have to define where you are walking around before you decide on the lens to walk around with.
I think you have to define where you are walking around before you decide on the lens to walk around with.
Really ... how bogus. The topic is "walk around lens". Wearing hiking boots does NOT define "walk around". Bad examples abound. (Two attached below.)
May 29, 2022 22:49:45 #
User ID wrote:
Im sorry that your friend is passed tents.
alive in a house last time I saw last week
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.