Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Despicable Ted
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 21, 2021 11:37:03   #
RixPix Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Republicans will do anything for money.



Reply
Feb 21, 2021 11:43:23   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Happened in 2018. Not illegal according to FEC.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ted-cruz-summons-mailings/

Cruz defeated O'Rourke by a margin of 50.9 to 48.3 percent; the race was the closest U.S. Senate race in Texas since 1978. Whatever it takes to win, including mis-leading the elderly.

But isn't that kind of small potatoes compared to the BIG LIE of 2020? 🤔

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 11:59:43   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Happened in 2018. Not illegal according to FEC.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ted-cruz-summons-mailings/

Cruz defeated O'Rourke by a margin of 50.9 to 48.3 percent; the race was the closest U.S. Senate race in Texas since 1978. Whatever it takes to win, including mis-leading the elderly.

But isn't that kind of small potatoes compared to the BIG LIE of 2020? 🤔


True, small potatoes for a mail fraud. But you must be referring to the big dirty Mail-In vote lie of an election that gave Biden, campaigning in his basement 15 million more votes than even Obama ever won. And nobody even likes the feeble dementia challenged Biden but the Liberal media.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2021 12:40:47   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
RixPix wrote:
Republicans will do anything for money.


Fear-mongering is their first to go-to tool.

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 12:46:24   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Happened in 2018. Not illegal according to FEC.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ted-cruz-summons-mailings/

Cruz defeated O'Rourke by a margin of 50.9 to 48.3 percent; the race was the closest U.S. Senate race in Texas since 1978. Whatever it takes to win, including mis-leading the elderly.

But isn't that kind of small potatoes compared to the BIG LIE of 2020? 🤔


isn't that small potatoes compared to cuomos lies....get tired of grams..send her to msg home in NY!!!!

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 12:48:23   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Fotoartist wrote:
True, small potatoes for a mail fraud. But you must be referring to the big dirty Mail-In vote lie of an election that gave Biden, campaigning in his basement 15 million more votes than even Obama ever won. And nobody even likes the feeble dementia challenged Biden but the Liberal media.


well...there is frank, linda, booboo, pixie, et al

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 12:58:51   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Kraken wrote:
Fear-mongering is their first to go-to tool.
If you Google "Republican party fear mongering," you will see how long this has been their platform. And it has worked!

.

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2021 13:04:58   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
If you Google "Republican party fear mongering," you will see how long this has been their platform. And it has worked!

.


It mostly works on the weak-minded that can't think for themselves.

I just never thought that there are 70 million of them in America.

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 13:09:18   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
wilpharm wrote:
well...there is frank, linda, booboo, pixie, et al


They have never said what they like about Biden. Notice that?

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 14:13:27   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Kraken wrote:
It mostly works on the weak-minded that can't think for themselves.

I just never thought that there are 70 million of them in America.
We are a mess, no doubt about it

.

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 15:52:57   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Fotoartist wrote:
They have never said what they like about Biden. Notice that?


true, that

Reply
 
 
Feb 21, 2021 16:01:55   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
Fotoartist wrote:
They have never said what they like about Biden. Notice that?


Write “Trump is...” followed by a long descriptive sentence or paragraph that describes everything you like about Trump.

Now copy/paste as a new paragraph below that one.

Now go back to the first paragraph and add “not” ahead of the descriptors; in the second paragraph correct “Trump” to read “Biden.”

Reply
Feb 21, 2021 16:19:02   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
JohnFrim wrote:
Write “Trump is...” followed by a long descriptive sentence or paragraph that describes everything you like about Trump.

Now copy/paste as a new paragraph below that one.

Now go back to the first paragraph and add “not” ahead of the descriptors; in the second paragraph correct “Trump” to read “Biden.”


NWR

Reply
Feb 22, 2021 09:57:53   #
FrumCA
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
If you Google "Republican party fear mongering," you will see how long this has been their platform. And it has worked!

.

If you Google "Democrat party fear mongering", you will see how long this has been their platform. And it has worked!! https://www.commentarymagazine.com/noah-rothman/republican-party-fearmongering-democrats/
Just pointing out that it goes both ways.

Reply
Feb 22, 2021 10:16:14   #
Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay
 
FrumCA wrote:
If you Google "Democrat party fear mongering", you will see how long this has been their platform. And it has worked!! https://www.commentarymagazine.com/noah-rothman/republican-party-fearmongering-democrats/
Just pointing out that it goes both ways.


Fear and Anxiety Drive Conservatives' Political Attitudes

Can brain differences explain conservatives' fear-driven political stances?

1. Conservatives tend to focus on the negative.

In a 2012 study, liberal and conservative participants were shown collages of negative and positive images on a computer screen while their eye movements were recorded. While liberals were quicker to look at pleasant images, like a happy child or a cute bunny rabbit, conservatives tended to behave oppositely. They’d first inspect threatening and disturbing pictures—things like car wrecks, spiders on faces, and open wounds crawling with maggots—and would also tend to dwell on them for longer.

This is what psychologists call a “negativity bias.” If you think about it, this makes sense. When attention is biased toward the negative, the result is an overly threat-conscious appraisal of one’s surroundings. To many conservatives, the world may look like a much scarier place. This would seem to explain why so many major conservative viewpoints tend to be rooted in fear—fear of the president, immigrants, vaccinations, etc.

2. Conservatives have a stronger physiological response to threats.

A 2008 study published in the journal Science found that conservatives have a stronger physiological response to startling noises and graphic images. This adds to a growing body of research that indicates a hypersensitivity to threat—a hallmark of anxiety. But why exactly would those who scare more easily tend to support conservative views?

One social psychologist from the University of Central Arkansas, Paul Nail, has a pretty interesting answer: “Conservatism, apparently, helps to protect people against some of the natural difficulties of living. The fact is we don’t live in a completely safe world. Things can and do go wrong. But if I can impose this order on it by my worldview, I can keep my anxiety to a manageable level.” This could explain the two parties’ different stances on gun control. It makes sense that those who startle more easily are also the ones that believe they need to own a gun.

3. Conservatives fear new experiences.

A 2008 study cataloged items found in the bedrooms of college students and saw that while liberals owned more books and travel-related items, conservatives had more things that kept order in their lives, like calendars and cleaning supplies.

This suggests that liberals more often seek adventure and novel experiences. Conservatives, on the other hand, may prefer a more ordered, disciplined lifestyle. This could help explain why they can be resistant to change and progressive policies.

4. Conservatives’ brains are more reactive to fear.

Using MRI, scientists from University College London have found that students who identify themselves as conservatives have a larger amygdala than self-described liberals. This brain structure is involved in emotion processing, and it's especially reactive to fearful stimuli. It is possible that an oversized amygdala could create a heightened sensitivity that may cause one to habitually overreact to anything that appears to be a potential threat, whether it actually is one or not. This disproportionate fear response could explain how, for example, Bush’s administration was able to gather wide public support amongst conservatives for invading Iraq. Maybe if they said the phrase “weapons of mass destruction” enough times, it wouldn’t matter whether they existed or not.

Empirical evidence suggests that conservatives and liberals don’t just have different outlooks and opinions—they also have different brains. This means that our choice of political affiliation and overall worldview may not really be all that much of a choice. Still, we must work to understand these psychological and biological distinctions so that we can ultimately use this knowledge to work together and find middle ground. Such information may also make us less vulnerable to those who want to exploit these dispositions for their own selfish agendas by using tactics like fear-mongering.

Furthermore, knowing why someone is the way they are can help us to be more tolerant and patient with one another. But we must also be honest about the situation. When important choices are being made based on gut instinct rather than logical reasoning, it is everyone’s responsibility to point this out so that it doesn’t result in catastrophe.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.