Warning: The linked video is coarse, but it serves to provide context to my question.
The following Chris Rock clip is lewd in language, somewhat dismissive of the violent potential of domestic discord, and distinctly anti-woman, at least in the venue of divorce trials. It is all over YouTube, but I've had many a post from YouTube removed for saying men are not women, and specifically that biological men should not be allowed in women's sports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAmeW8bq08kCan someone explain how distinctly anti-women comedy is allowed, but pro-women sentiments get removed as hate speech? Of course, I meant an explanation that is logical and follows facts, not the 'inclusivity' (while excluding the definition of 'female' and disparaging women everywhere) clap trap spewed ever forth by those devoid of facts.
It is ironic, though, that the comedy bit lampoons the divorce trial as not relying on facts, and instead relying on feelings, and what one is 'accustomed to'.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.