Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Sony A 6000 lenses
Dec 20, 2020 20:56:26   #
AMD Loc: Houston,TX
 
I mostly use my Sony A 6000 with its 10-18mm and 50mm lenses to walk around. What do you suggest for better street and landscape photography with this Sony?

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 00:05:15   #
Gifted One Loc: S. E. Idaho
 
Practice! The wide zoom is to die for. I would use it for landscapes. The 50 is a great lens. Like a 75 on FF, great for prospective. I would take those two in a heart beat.

J. R.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 01:04:35   #
Iron Sight Loc: Utah
 
If you haven’t tried RAW processing for a quality improvement you might do that.

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2020 07:13:08   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
AMD wrote:
I mostly use my Sony A 6000 with its 10-18mm and 50mm lenses to walk around. What do you suggest for better street and landscape photography with this Sony?


When you say "street photography" what do you mean exactly, candid's of people, street scape's, what exactly?
The following is what Canon recommends.
Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM. Best wide Canon street lens. ...
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM. Best all-round Canon street zoom lens. ...
Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM. Best Canon street lens for dreamy bokeh. ...
Canon RF 24-105mm F4L IS USM. Best Canon RF all-rounder zoom street lens. ...
Canon RF 35mm F1. 8 Macro IS STM. ...
Canon RF 50mm F1. 8 STM.

If your talking about candid photography of people on the street, BEWARE, we are in a new world out there.
I only do street candid's during parades and street festivals, and I wear an official photographers vest. If you value your equipment, and don't want to end up with a black eye, be very careful when doing candid street photography in general on non parade and festival days. You have been fore warned.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 08:36:00   #
AMD Loc: Houston,TX
 
Thank you for the warning.
You are talking about FF Canon lenses, they are good ones. I like to carry small, light cameras (Sony A 6000 is an APS-C ) I do not have experience with the Sony or Zeiss lenses.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 08:38:14   #
AMD Loc: Houston,TX
 
Thanks.
Do you have any experience with other Sony or Zeiss wide angle lenses ?

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 08:56:25   #
AMD Loc: Houston,TX
 
Thanks. I have very little knowledge about computer and PP. I heard about RAW and DNG but have not tried. I shoot JPEGs and rely on my luck !

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2020 09:48:20   #
FalconChase Loc: Canton,Ohio, USA
 
I like my Zeiss Touit 32 /1.8 or the Sony Zeiss 35 / 2.8. The Samyang 24/2.8 is also a nice lens on the a6000. The Touit is an apsc lens. The other two are full frame.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 10:24:54   #
Iron Sight Loc: Utah
 
A nice little carry around lens for me and my Sony A 6000 is the Sony 18-135 F3.5-56.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 10:35:46   #
Don, the 2nd son Loc: Crowded Florida
 
Gifted One wrote:
Practice! The wide zoom is to die for. I would use it for landscapes. The 50 is a great lens. Like a 75 on FF, great for prospective. I would take those two in a heart beat.

J. R.


You wont find any better for that than what you already have!! Just do it! Enjoy this system. I have the a6000 & a6300 with those and a couple other lenses.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 11:13:55   #
rdgreenwood Loc: Kennett Square, Pennsylvania
 
When I bought my A6000, it came with a Sony 18-55 that was softer than a princess’s pillow. I’m a nut about sharpness, so I checked around and bought a Zeiss 16-70. The lens cost more, a lot more, than the camera; but it’s tack sharp. The Sony is my travel camera—I shoot with a Nikon at home—and I want my memories to be clear. As I said, Zeiss rhymes with “price,” but it’s worth it. BTW, this lens lives on my camera 99% of the time.

Good luck with your search.

Reply
 
 
Dec 21, 2020 12:15:12   #
Wingpilot Loc: Wasilla. Ak
 
Iron Sight wrote:
A nice little carry around lens for me and my Sony A 6000 is the Sony 18-135 F3.5-56.


I have an A6300 with the 18-135 lens. It’s a very nice lens and performs well.

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 12:33:07   #
timcc Loc: Virginia
 
rdgreenwood wrote:
When I bought my A6000, it came with a Sony 18-55 that was softer than a princess’s pillow. I’m a nut about sharpness, so I checked around and bought a Zeiss 16-70. The lens cost more, a lot more, than the camera; but it’s tack sharp. The Sony is my travel camera—I shoot with a Nikon at home—and I want my memories to be clear. As I said, Zeiss rhymes with “price,” but it’s worth it. BTW, this lens lives on my camera 99% of the time.

Good luck with your search.


I also use the 16-70 as my walk-around lens. A bit pricey, but its small size and low weight are a perfect balance
on the a6000 -- it's especially good for travel. While early on there were problems with some 16-70s, current copies seem to have better quality control. Mine is tack sharp, has very solid construction, and is a pleasure to use.

I also carry two primes (12mm and 35mm) for super wide angle and low-light shots, and a 55-210 zoom for telephoto (some 55-210 lenses apparently also had quality control issues, but mine is sharp and seen lots of use).

Reply
Dec 21, 2020 16:47:08   #
Bob Locher Loc: Southwest Oregon
 
I have the 18-135mm lens too - and I find it to be terrific. At f5.6 - f8 it is as sharp as some very good fixed focal length lenses but offers the significant benefits of a zoom.

Note too that the 18-135 is a stabilized lens, which is a huge plus when used with a camera without built in stabilization, such as you A6000.

Cheers

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.