President Trump paid $3M in Wisconsin recount only for Biden to gain 132 votes
Nov 28, 2020 08:47:47 #
Nov 28, 2020 08:49:51 #
Nov 28, 2020 08:59:50 #
49south wrote:
https://nypost.com/2020/11/28/trump-paid-3m-in-wisconsin-recount-sees-biden-gain-132-votes/
[cmt deleted]
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Nov 28, 2020 09:05:14 #
49south wrote:
https://www.newsweek.com/milwaukee-county-certifies-election-bidens-favor-says-no-fraud-found-recount-1550885
Seems to be a disconnect here. The source of your first post was dated 11/28 and reported the counting was still in process. The source of this post was dated 11/27 and it reports the counting has been completed. Who should we believe? Is the liberal Newsweek making another prediction without evidence?? In any case Trump is entitled to a recount just as any candidate would be. Sometimes they don't go in favor of the candidate requesting it.
Nov 28, 2020 09:18:45 #
FrumCA wrote:
Seems to be a disconnect here. The source of your first post was dated 11/28 and reported the counting was still in process. The source of this post was dated 11/27 and it reports the counting has been completed. Who should we believe? Is the liberal Newsweek making another prediction without evidence?? In any case Trump is entitled to a recount just as any candidate would be. Sometimes they don't go in favor of the candidate requesting it.
Believe that Trump will lose this election no matter when the recount was taken. Trump was effectively, fairly fired.
Why is that so hard to accept?
Nov 28, 2020 09:30:18 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Believe that Trump will lose this election no matter when the recount was taken. Trump was effectively, fairly fired.
Why is that so hard to accept?
Why is that so hard to accept?
It's not hard to accept at all...once all the court cases are resolved, including any that may make their way to the SCOTUS, and the election is certified. It's the 'fairly' part of your argument that's in question. This is not a difficult position to take and one I feel you would be taking if the shoe were on the other foot. Unfortunately I don't have any record of your position when HRC lost. Based on your TDS I'm guessing you weren't/aren't happy. I recall she contemplated challenging the election results but I think she didn't follow through because she knew her claims of Russian interference were weak at best and wouldn't stand up to scrutiny.
Nov 28, 2020 09:36:11 #
FrumCA wrote:
It's not hard to accept at all...once all the court cases are resolved, including any that may make there way to the SCOTUS, and the election is certified. It's the 'fairly' part of your argument that's in question. This is not a difficult position to take and one I feel you would be taking if the shoe were on the other foot.
There is no evidence of fraud. Cases were filed, Donald, Rudy, and all the attorneys came up with nothing—so there is nothing.
If there was anything but baseless tweets from Trump, rational people would listen.
This is Trump—everything he touches is fraudulent.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Nov 28, 2020 09:40:32 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
There is no evidence of fraud. Cases were filed, Donald, Rudy, and all the attorneys came up with nothing—so there is nothing.
If there was anything but baseless tweets from Trump, rational people would listen.
This is Trump—everything he touches is fraudulent.
If there was anything but baseless tweets from Trump, rational people would listen.
This is Trump—everything he touches is fraudulent.
I stand by my original position. Cases were filed and others are still in process. I'm waiting for everything to play out. If rational people paid attention they would realize Trump is entitled to his day in court.
Nov 28, 2020 09:43:34 #
FrumCA wrote:
I stand by my original position. Cases were filed and others are still in process. I'm waiting for everything to play out. If rational people paid attention they would realize Trump is entitled to his day in court.
Trump is getting his day in court and being shut down and embarrassed by judges that he appointed,
Do you have flies in your eyes?
Nov 28, 2020 09:50:11 #
FrumCA wrote:
Seems to be a disconnect here. The source of your first post was dated 11/28 and reported the counting was still in process. The source of this post was dated 11/27 and it reports the counting has been completed. Who should we believe? Is the liberal Newsweek making another prediction without evidence?? In any case Trump is entitled to a recount just as any candidate would be. Sometimes they don't go in favor of the candidate requesting it.
Trump campaign paid for recounts in two counties- Milwaukee and Dane. Milwaukee finished as noted with Biden gaining 132. The other county - Dane- is schedule to finish today(Sunday)
See previous thread “”” Duh !””
Nov 28, 2020 09:52:54 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Trump is getting his day in court and being shut down and embarrassed by judges that he appointed,
Do you have flies in your eyes?
Do you have flies in your eyes?
My position has not changed. When all the court cases have played out, including any that may make their way to the SCOTUS and the election is certified then it's over. I don't have to be happy with the way things are looking right now but I'm surely not going to be convinced by your arguments that I should not let my convictions hold true.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Nov 28, 2020 10:03:27 #
FrumCA wrote:
My position has not changed. When all the court cases have played out, including any that may make their way to the SCOTUS and the election is certified then it's over. I don't have to be happy with the way things are looking right now but I'm surely not going to be convinced by your arguments that I should not let my convictions hold true.
I don’t expect my arguments to make any difference to you. But the dismissed courts cases are factual, and the written opinions are persuasive—to those who are not totally awash in Trumpism.
Nov 28, 2020 10:36:27 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
I don’t expect my arguments to make any difference to you. But the dismissed courts cases are factual, and the written opinions are persuasive—to those who are not totally awash in Trumpism.
That's good to hear. You are beginning to sound like a broken record. Your TDS is and has been quite evident so it's interesting to me why you feel you must persist with your arguments. No one has denied the direction the court cases have taken but that doesn't mitigate the fact that some others are still in progress including one or two that may make their way to the SCOTUS. If you are really so hateful that you would deny Trump his right to pursue resolution his claims, as inconsequential you think they are?
Nov 28, 2020 10:41:08 #
DennyT wrote:
Trump campaign paid for recounts in two counties- Milwaukee and Dane. Milwaukee finished as noted with Biden gaining 132. The other county - Dane- is schedule to finish today(Sunday)
See previous thread “”” Duh !””
See previous thread “”” Duh !””
Oops. I missed that. Guess I need more coffee!!
Nov 28, 2020 20:10:36 #
Soba? Mate? Are you out there? Can you get word to Rudy it's only going to cost USD $495,000 for a recount at
the Texcaster Embassy in Range View? The Ruski word is that the Swedish backpackerers voted twice for Obama.
the Texcaster Embassy in Range View? The Ruski word is that the Swedish backpackerers voted twice for Obama.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.