Utter lack of honesty
Nov 9, 2020 23:08:17 #
In the clip linked, we are treated with the argument that "in 2020 more white people voted for Trump than in 2016". While that may be true, so too did more Latino people and FAR more black males. The argument that the speaker tries to make is that such (white) turnout is a sign of racism. What an utter lack of honesty.
That more whites voted Trump (assuming the truth of that) is proof more people voted for Trump policy. That, apparently, with more whites, more latinos, and more blacks voting Trump, he still is losing, proves a huge boost in turnout for all voters, specifically those who might vote against Trump.
Absolute numbers is a liars argument. If 30% of voters vote in an election and then 70% vote the next time, citing absolute numbers, and then crying 'racism' is an abject lie. It's an ongoing lie of convenience.
IF Trump got votes from racists at a rate greater than Hillary got votes from non-racists (unproven of course), the only real conclusion is that Hillary was not even alluring enough as a candidate to offset the votes of racists. That Biden, apparently, is winning, is proof he WAS more alluring, and a vote AGAINST the lie of systemically racist America.
Why does media need to promulgate lies at a moment Biden is 'declared' the winner? Might it be a memo has already been circulated? Might it be the -16% Pennsylvania tally at 1 AM Eastern election night is actually the trend? Might it be that even in the shadow of media's denial of fraud the fraud-sters need cover? I'm starting to feel that the court challenges in PA, NV, GA, WI, MI, are about to uncover a lot more than 17 dead voters.....
OK.... terrible proofreading.... Not uncover dead voters. (Poltergeist was made in the 80's.)
I meant uncover the VOTES attributed to dead people, and a lot more fraud.
link https://youtu.be/R5ki6S-WsKU?t=787
That more whites voted Trump (assuming the truth of that) is proof more people voted for Trump policy. That, apparently, with more whites, more latinos, and more blacks voting Trump, he still is losing, proves a huge boost in turnout for all voters, specifically those who might vote against Trump.
Absolute numbers is a liars argument. If 30% of voters vote in an election and then 70% vote the next time, citing absolute numbers, and then crying 'racism' is an abject lie. It's an ongoing lie of convenience.
IF Trump got votes from racists at a rate greater than Hillary got votes from non-racists (unproven of course), the only real conclusion is that Hillary was not even alluring enough as a candidate to offset the votes of racists. That Biden, apparently, is winning, is proof he WAS more alluring, and a vote AGAINST the lie of systemically racist America.
Why does media need to promulgate lies at a moment Biden is 'declared' the winner? Might it be a memo has already been circulated? Might it be the -16% Pennsylvania tally at 1 AM Eastern election night is actually the trend? Might it be that even in the shadow of media's denial of fraud the fraud-sters need cover? I'm starting to feel that the court challenges in PA, NV, GA, WI, MI, are about to uncover a lot more than 17 dead voters.....
OK.... terrible proofreading.... Not uncover dead voters. (Poltergeist was made in the 80's.)
I meant uncover the VOTES attributed to dead people, and a lot more fraud.
link https://youtu.be/R5ki6S-WsKU?t=787
Nov 9, 2020 23:39:26 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.