Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon D3200 or Sony Slt A65?????
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Sep 27, 2012 10:41:00   #
southernecho Loc: Tasmania, Australia
 
I am tossing up between the 2 of these dslr's.... any comments or suggestions????

Reply
Sep 27, 2012 10:52:20   #
rodpark2 Loc: Dallas, Tx
 
southernecho wrote:
I am tossing up between the 2 of these dslr's.... any comments or suggestions????


I have the d3100 and SLT A55. One issue worth considering is the viewfinder system. I took a NM trip last summer and did a lot of desert shooting, including White Sands, NM. I loved the panoramic feature and the HD ability of the Sony, but the viewfinder was really lacking when used in the bright desert light. Both the LCD and the internal finder were very, very hard to see to focus or confirm focus. I use manual focus a lot and the Nikon was definitely better for that.

Reply
Sep 27, 2012 11:06:42   #
richnash46 Loc: Texas
 
southernecho wrote:
I am tossing up between the 2 of these dslr's.... any comments or suggestions????


My first, second and third choices would be the Nikon D3200!

Reply
 
 
Sep 27, 2012 12:58:42   #
tlbuljac Loc: Oklahoma
 
Ditto

Reply
Sep 27, 2012 14:03:19   #
oldmalky Loc: West Midlands,England.
 
Im guessing the previous posters no nothing about Sony,I have the A57 with the same view finder and although I have never used it in a desert i would never go back to the old type the same goes for the live view.

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 06:11:52   #
viscountdriver Loc: East Kent UK
 
Nikon every time.Can't beat it

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 07:39:48   #
Farmers Wife Loc: Louisburg, KS
 
I got a Sony last year....sorry I did, Canon is much more flexable. I get betty shots with my pocket Nikon.

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2012 07:40:50   #
Farmers Wife Loc: Louisburg, KS
 
I meant the Nikon. I let the sales person talk me i to it. Duh...

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 07:55:06   #
Peekayoh Loc: UK
 
rodpark2 wrote:
southernecho wrote:
I am tossing up between the 2 of these dslr's.... any comments or suggestions????


I have the d3100 and SLT A55. One issue worth considering is the viewfinder system. I took a NM trip last summer and did a lot of desert shooting, including White Sands, NM. I loved the panoramic feature and the HD ability of the Sony, but the viewfinder was really lacking when used in the bright desert light. Both the LCD and the internal finder were very, very hard to see to focus or confirm focus. I use manual focus a lot and the Nikon was definitely better for that.
quote=southernecho I am tossing up between the 2 ... (show quote)
My guess is that you need to learn to correctly use the a65. BTW, rear screens are universally poor in bright sunlight.

I use the a77 (same EVF as the a65) alongside the a900, a full frame camera with arguably the best OVF around, in any case it's streets in front of the small offering in the D3100. Having focus peaking and focus magnify on the a65 makes it very easy to focus manually. No doubt that it beats the pants off anything else including split prism screens.

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 08:10:42   #
DannyJS Loc: St. Helena Island
 
Have to admit I'm not too impressed with the Nikon D3200 after reading the reviews. It's good in parts - BUT: do you really need a 24 megapixel sensor on a "base model" camera? - (Huge file sizes = more computing power needed for processing). Also the rest of the camera hasn't really "caught up" with the sensor, so limited gains to be had. I'd either go for the D3100 OR the D5100, depending on your requirements & budget, and spend cash on good lenses. - I have the D5100 because I wanted the flip & swivel LCD screen facility.
PS: Sony ARE making some nice DSLRs, - depends if you're happy with the electronic Viewfinder there.

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 08:10:45   #
DannyJS Loc: St. Helena Island
 
Have to admit I'm not too impressed with the Nikon D3200 after reading the reviews. It's good in parts - BUT: do you really need a 24 megapixel sensor on a "base model" camera? - (Huge file sizes = more computing power needed for processing). Also the rest of the camera hasn't really "caught up" with the sensor, so limited gains to be had. I'd either go for the D3100 OR the D5100, depending on your requirements & budget, and spend cash on good lenses. - I have the D5100 because I wanted the flip & swivel LCD screen facility.
PS: Sony ARE making some nice DSLRs, - depends if you're happy with the electronic Viewfinder there.

Reply
 
 
Sep 28, 2012 08:13:22   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
Here's a link to a side by side comparison at DP Review...Pretty close in features, all depends on what's important to you feature wise...Also, the Sony looks to be a few hundred dollars more expensive...

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-side?products=sony_slta65&products=nikon_d3200

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 09:25:09   #
spphoto Loc: Long Island,N.Y.
 
I am not too sure about the A65,but I have An A77 and the brightness of the viewing screen is adjustable.Also if you use the full time live view you can all was shade it in bright sunlight

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 09:54:42   #
rolf Loc: Kenora Ont.Canada
 
Got the d3200 with the 18-105mm about a month ago and happy with it.Still have a lot to learn about it but have got some nice shots.This is one of the first pic of my dog.

Spot
Spot...

Reply
Sep 28, 2012 10:24:04   #
moffie100
 
What lenses do you currently have that you can use with either?

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.