I have to go with #1 being the sharpest, with #2 and #3 being similar to each other, and not quite as sharp as #1.
I'm looking at the stamen/pistils first, then the flower petals. On this basis, all 3 are 'keepers'. If you want to search for the small difference between lenses, use resolution charts, discernable to all as a way to compare one vs another. This is a 'real world' comparison of 3. And all 3 came up with credible/viable offerings at a much lower 'bar' of evaluation.
Suggest you use something that aids the direct comparison of A-B-C like a distant city outline against the sky or any of a variety of similar ways to 'pixel peep' the differences between each one. If I don't do this, user 'error' or differences could be the determining factor in one vs the other of 3 options. (Did I somehow get the focus absolutely identical in 3 pictures of the same 3 dimensional picture 'subject'? (very difficult to do)
I'll go with # 2 it is the sharpest to my eyes, but all of then are keepers. The differences are so minimal in color, contrast, and sharpness.
Comparing the 3 shots downloaded and zoomed, I see #1 as the clearest, but only by a slight degree. #2 and #3 are indistinguishable.
SuperflyTNT wrote:
It’s like saying, “I have a family sedan, a pickup truck and a Ferrari. I tested them all at 50 mph. Which should I keep?”
But which lens is the Ferrari?
So far the only thing I don't like (for the money) is the weight. 3+ pounds soaking wet, but it is weather sealed, I think?
quixdraw wrote:
IMO Once adjusted "Nothing to see, move along."
Agreed. A search for a solution without a problem.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.