One A Day, Day 186.
Yes, I'm still doing creative work.
I could talk about the work but lets face it...
This one conjures up a lot of thoughts, none of them good.
jaymatt wrote:
This one conjures up a lot of thoughts, none of them good.
Well thanks Mr. jaymatt, you never approve of my image posts so I guess just another back handed complement. Enjoy hearing your input as always.
jaymatt wrote:
This one conjures up a lot of thoughts, none of them good.
I for one agree with jaymat and others. I was hoping for the last of Timmers porno..!!!....................RJM
The basement looks kinda grim.
Don’t let the naysayers bother you...I don’t like everything you post but a lot of it is just fine. Some of them are a little more risqué than others with lower ladybits included...but you’re not the only one that does that and I do not see every post with the V word visible labeled as porn so take their disdain for what it is worth.
Me...I like ladybits...as well as the T word that some gripe about.
Timmers wrote:
Yes, I'm still doing creative work.
I could talk about the work but lets face it...
Grim basement indeed! 👍
Naysayers be damned! They probably ogle and drool at other nude posts yet condemn something stylized. Hypocrites.
digit-up wrote:
I for one agree with jaymat and others. I was hoping for the last of Timmers porno..!!!....................RJM
No such luck "buddy", I will stop my work and posting some of it "when they pry my dead fingers off the mouse!" We all know you love train wrecks because I still use that "One A Day" signature, so you get what is always coming, or at least breathing hard. LOL!!! Oh, and thanks for the attention, I do appreciate it!
drobvit wrote:
Grim basement indeed! 👍
Naysayers be damned! They probably ogle and drool at other nude posts yet condemn something stylized. Hypocrites.
Chill dude! It rolls up the count on views and that draws the viewers like crazy. It is my 'mother's milk', don't you know I'm a sick-O, it's just attention getting for me; just like Lucas Samaras* well may be not, I ain't no cannibal!
*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Samaras
neillaubenthal wrote:
Don’t let the naysayers bother you...I don’t like everything you post but a lot of it is just fine. Some of them are a little more risqué than others with lower ladybits included...but you’re not the only one that does that and I do not see every post with the V word visible labeled as porn so take their disdain for what it is worth.
Me...I like ladybits...as well as the T word that some gripe about.
Well! A boy after my love of women. Truth is I can't post a large body of the images or I would be banned. These babes are from a more modern era and the Hog is defiantly 'Old School' as them ladies say. Man if I relayed the stories, boy would the hits per view just jump off the charts, but this is a visual place not literary. Oh, what the heck, Jessica and VADA, I was being a romantic for these, it was a set titled First Kiss, and after I folded up my photo tent and went in to down load and edit the images. The girls disappeared up to the garden apartment to slake! Yep, even today when they get over to the studio they can't keep their hands to themselves! Naughty girls! LOL!!!
I did tease VADA later, Vada was 34 at the time while Jessica was just turned 19. I teased VADA calling her a cradle robber!
Fotoartist wrote:
The basement looks kinda grim.
Just to clarify, the Cedar Closet is not in a basement. There are no basements in San Antonio, way too much moisture.
Yet your observation is spot on!
That back wall is made of industrial grade cinder block. I could easily knock all the cider blocks out and replace that wall with anything including nothing.
If you look at the short model, directly behind her head there is a 3 inch pipe, that is welded to a 'L' beam that is 4X4 railroad grade steel. Revealed at either of the two ends of the opening, where the cinder block has been removed, you can see the steel strap plates to hold the 4X8 supports for the apartment above.
The builders used the cinder block like modern construction uses boards and lumber. Yep, way over built, but that is how construction could be done back in the teens of the last century.
To be clear, the environment is call, by myself as The Cedar Closet, it is not a dungeon, it is much better than some phony dungeon location. Photographers and models just fall in love with this studio in my large building. The girls giggle a lot at me as it is quite a challenge for me, as I am almost 7 feet tall and the rafter supports are about 5' 9 off the asphalt floor; and I can assure you that the supports that are at Tim's head knocking level are 4X4 and 4X8 supports. Man they hurt my head when I forget to duck!
Timmers wrote:
Yes, I'm still doing creative work.
I could talk about the work but lets face it...
The dominatrix looks like a bloke, & a big one at that??
Bunko.T wrote:
The dominatrix looks like a bloke, & a big one at that??
Thanks for this, I agree with you completely! It is such a refreshing response to have someone SEE the obvious and still be able to respond. I don't usually receive such positive feed back here on the hog.
The scale shifting for the foreground and rear figure is of course real, but with lens selection and placement through a strong set of poses has rendered this an excellence that is not the usual. To take a woman and alter her into a more universal image that can conveys both genders, can be quite rewarding.
When I saw the bodies and the gestures of each I knew they worked well togeather. The model in the background with her pouting facial gesture lends itself well to the foreground models disdainful glance at the viewer.
This image rocks with strong emotive sensations.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Timmers wrote:
Thanks for this, I agree with you completely! It is such a refreshing response to have someone SEE the obvious and still be able to respond. I don't usually receive such positive feed back here on the hog.
The scale shifting for the foreground and rear figure is of course real, but with lens selection and placement through a strong set of poses has rendered this an excellence that is not the usual. To take a woman and alter her into a more universal image that can conveys both genders, can be quite rewarding.
When I saw the bodies and the gestures of each I knew they worked well togeather. The model in the background with her pouting facial gesture lends itself well to the foreground models disdainful glance at the viewer.
This image rocks with strong emotive sensations.
Thanks for this, I agree with you completely! It i... (
show quote)
Sorry, Tim, but I don't for a moment believe that you intentionally had VADA conveying a male body. This is retrospective interpretation, not artistic design by intent. Had her breasts received a bit more light there would be no mistaking her for a woman.
BTW, the photos of the 2 ladies are very sensual and very nice.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.