Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why do we say "image", instead of photograph or picture
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
Jun 21, 2020 10:06:37   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Some say that as soon as you apply editing to a photo you've changed it and it's not the original photo any more. Some take a more sensible approach and acknowledge that most photos need editing so it's OK to edit them as long as they still look reasonably natural at the end. Others see photos as just a starting point for their creative expression and any amount of editing goes. As a consequence the amount and quality of editing varies enormously as does our opinion concerning where to place the line between a photo and a created image. Referring to all of them as "images" frees us from the need to differentiate between what can be considered a photo and what should be thought of as a created image.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:06:49   #
BebuLamar
 
It seems that the use of the word image is to distinguish from digital and film. Popular Photography at a time changed their name to "Popular Photography and Imaging" in order to mean they cover digital as well.
Is it correct or not correct? I don't know. I am not good at linguistic.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:14:06   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Longshadow wrote:
Yes, nice is probably most common.

Could be this simple too:
"What was the photographer trying to say? Maybe he just liked what he saw...".
No story.

Unless the photographer explains the image, there could be a multiple of "stories" for am image.
One, or none, may be correct.


And what is "correct"? For photojournalism it's obvious. For a work of art?

Reply
 
 
Jun 21, 2020 10:15:14   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
Encouraging to have confirmation of the fact that I mostly take just photos.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:15:25   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
When I worked at a photo lab back in the 1990's, we oftentimes used the term "images" when referring to slides/positive transparencies and negatives. The term "photos" was generally reserved for actual prints. As I recall, most of the professional photographers visiting the lab did the same.
To me, it makes sense to use the term "images" for digital files, even if the vast majority of today's digital images are never intended to be printed.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:17:53   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
BebuLamar wrote:
It seems that the use of the word image is to distinguish from digital and film. Popular Photography at a time changed their name to "Popular Photography and Imaging" in order to mean they cover digital as well.
Is it correct or not correct? I don't know. I am not good at linguistic.

Hahaha. Yes.
It depends how pitnicky {sic} people want to be...
If it uses a camera, it's photography.
I don't care what medium is used.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:19:40   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
rook2c4 wrote:
.....The term "photos" was generally reserved for actual prints.....


That probably reflects how most of us think of it.

Reply
 
 
Jun 21, 2020 10:23:10   #
User ID
 
St.Mary's wrote:
Only five letters, and easier to spell?


Works for me ....

Altho we could just write “photo”.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:23:52   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
JD750 wrote:
It is more generic. Not all images are photographs or pictures.

After performing extensive retouching or graphics work for example. Is it still a photograph? Or is it a graphic image?


Not that again. Before digital I don't ever remember anyone saying an image was extensively manipulated in the darkroom so it was no longer a photograph.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:26:22   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Not that again. Before digital I don't ever remember anyone saying an image was extensively manipulated in the darkroom so it was no longer a photograph.


Reply
Jun 21, 2020 10:59:43   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
Nancysc wrote:
I first noticed the use of "image" about ten years ago at a photography workshop. Now I hear it all the time in YouTube videos about photography. Is there a reason for this usage?


I use image for electronic images, i.e., on the computer, and photograph for a printed image. Use whatever words you want, I don't think there is a "standard" on this.

Reply
 
 
Jun 21, 2020 12:13:15   #
Graham Smith Loc: Cambridgeshire UK
 
An image is a picture in your mind or an idea of how someone or something is or you imagine it will be. Imagination.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 12:33:41   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Graham Smith wrote:
An image is a picture in your mind or an idea of how someone or something is or you imagine it will be. Imagination.

That too.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 13:09:19   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Not that again. Before digital I don't ever remember anyone saying an image was extensively manipulated in the darkroom so it was no longer a photograph.


Photographs were used extensively in advertising, with extensive retouching, adding text and other info, "graphics", long before digital cameras were invented.

Reply
Jun 21, 2020 13:10:53   #
JD750 Loc: SoCal
 
Longshadow wrote:
Hahaha. Yes.
It depends how pitnicky {sic} people want to be...
If it uses a camera, it's photography.
I don't care what medium is used.


I have a phone that has a built in camera. Does that count?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.