Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Topless redhead used in various versions of book cover
Jun 6, 2020 18:39:22 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for the publisher's purpose, but they chose this one. Different retailers allow different levels of nudity; their designer did two book cover versions. Dunno how the book did; there's enormous competition from other publishers, not to mention the millions of legit and pirated photos on the web. Tip: when shooting for stock or covers, leave space around the subject so the graphic designer can easily extend background and/or have places to surprint or reverse text or graphics. Shown below are the original and two versions. ~850 watt-seconds of studio strobe through softbox. Nikon D300 24-70 fixed aperture zoom.
Jun 6, 2020 19:02:54 #
Many people crop their images and then delete the originals . Yours is a good tip leave space . I actually had in a class , shooting covers, and that was one of the tips. The second was never delete a photo , even if you have edited it, save the original. The instructor even said save your terrible shots because some day you may need it ( though I don't know why)
she is a pretty girl I think we saw her a few times
she is a pretty girl I think we saw her a few times
Jun 6, 2020 19:18:04 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
She IS very pretty. I submitted her for a Playboy centerfold. They did a test shoot but she didn't get the nod. Probably because of two small tattoos.
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Jun 6, 2020 20:13:07 #
Jun 6, 2020 20:26:47 #
Jun 6, 2020 23:52:13 #
travelwp wrote:
Very nice tits.
Well, you never disappoint!
Jun 7, 2020 01:01:46 #
JohnFrim wrote:
Well, you never disappoint!
Glad I could put a smile on your face John.
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Jun 7, 2020 09:17:46 #
travelwp wrote:
Very nice tits.
Thought you might have grown up, but no.
Beautiful young lady.
Jun 7, 2020 09:27:57 #
Jun 7, 2020 09:35:28 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for ... (show quote)
Beautiful young lady, shame to see only half of her. Would love to see the other half.
Jun 7, 2020 09:36:50 #
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Jun 7, 2020 09:51:19 #
Jun 7, 2020 11:26:41 #
Rab-Eye wrote:
Thought you might have grown up, but no.
Years ago I was in the US Navy and all of us called them tits and it was not a derogatory term. Real men don’t have a problem with the word “tits”.
Since you have trouble with the word “tit”, I think of you as a “wimpy liberal
Jun 7, 2020 13:25:50 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for ... (show quote)
I sent this in before. She looks like Nicole Wallace on MSNBC or her daughter.
Jun 7, 2020 13:38:44 #
smf85
Loc: Freeport, IL
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I thought other girls and shots were stronger for ... (show quote)
Good cover photo of a photogenic model.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.