Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
3D - Beach Scene
May 1, 2020 02:28:45 #
I've seen another photog post 3d photos here, but they need special glasses, and they screw up the coloring.
For this, you just have to cross your eyes, so the two images appear to merge.
For this, you just have to cross your eyes, so the two images appear to merge.
May 1, 2020 08:16:06 #
May 1, 2020 10:33:55 #
jaymatt wrote:
That’s pretty neat! 
Wish it were larger though.
Wish it were larger though.
If you click the "Download" link, you can see the full-size image. Still rather small, but larger than the embedded preview. (Also, too much bigger, it becomes difficult to view)
This was taken with a camera that has two lenses a few inches apart which takes two images at once. (It's a rather cheap point-and-shoot, barely more than a toy). I've tried to create similar works with my DSLR, by shoot a stationary scene, then taking a step to the side, and taking another, then editing them side-by-side. If I can find one like that, I'll post it.
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
May 1, 2020 10:38:14 #
Actually, the way you have them arranged you don't cross the eyes; you have to look into the distance for a parallel view. And when I download the image it is larger and wider than my interocular spacing, so I can't see the 3D effect on the download.
I gather these were done one after the other with a slight shift in position. It is noticeable because of the wisp of hair on her right side that has changed between shots.
I have taken the liberty of rearranging the L/R images so that you can view it cross-eyed.
I gather these were done one after the other with a slight shift in position. It is noticeable because of the wisp of hair on her right side that has changed between shots.
I have taken the liberty of rearranging the L/R images so that you can view it cross-eyed.
May 2, 2020 07:11:17 #
May 2, 2020 09:31:17 #
JamesCurran wrote:
I've seen another photog post 3d photos here, but they need special glasses, and they screw up the coloring.
For this, you just have to cross your eyes, so the two images appear to merge.
For this, you just have to cross your eyes, so the two images appear to merge.
Where is my stereoscopic viewer when I need it?
May 2, 2020 10:47:57 #
I have a 3D stereo viewer. So I can see them in all their glorious depth.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
May 2, 2020 15:24:41 #
Fotoartist wrote:
I have a 3D stereo viewer. So I can see them in all their glorious depth.
I assume you can see a difference between the L-R and the R-L that I posted. The stereoscopic images as first posted were for 3D stereo viewing, but the OP suggested crossing the eyes, which was incorrect for the original post.
May 2, 2020 22:20:01 #
James, it worked quite well. There's another UHH member who does similar work but different topic. His are quite good too. Some are done from just a single photograph.
--Bob
--Bob
JamesCurran wrote:
I've seen another photog post 3d photos here, but they need special glasses, and they screw up the coloring.
For this, you just have to cross your eyes, so the two images appear to merge.
For this, you just have to cross your eyes, so the two images appear to merge.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.