Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon 18-300mm 3.5-6.3 dx lens
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 18, 2020 13:38:46   #
truckster Loc: Tampa Bay Area
 
Chob wrote:
Wondering about anyone's experience using this lens as a single all around, relatively light weight travel lens versus taking two or three other lenses to cover the same range?



It is a great all around lens, but it isn't light weight. I bought this lens when I first started and now I find I have trouble holding it steady. I now only use it on a tripod with extender to get moon shots.

Reply
Mar 18, 2020 14:03:18   #
TonyBrown
 
Good walkabout lens. Used it on a holiday to the Galapagos with good results.

Reply
Mar 18, 2020 14:32:26   #
robertperry Loc: Sacramento, Ca.
 
I have used my DX18-300 3.5-6.3G ED VR for years. It stays on my D5300 most of the time. Both camera and lens are light weight and a great combo as a walk around. Occasionally I will put this DX lens on my D850. Some say it is a heavy lens, it is not. I won't be giving up this lens, it's a great lens for one size fits all. Do you have a DSLR or is the Z50 your only camera? If you have both, we will be more than happy to spend your money. I have 5 DX lenses, the others pretty much collect dust. The 18-300 is my go to lens. Continue your research. The choice is yours.

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2020 14:42:08   #
srfmhg Loc: Marin County, CA
 
I love my Nikon 18-300 and use it for 90% of my travel photos. It is the 3.5-5.6 which is slightly heavier and more expensive, but has gotten better reviews than the lighter 3.5-6.3. Feel free to check my posts for examples.
Mark

Reply
Mar 18, 2020 14:46:34   #
pleonardjr
 
TonyBrown wrote:
Good walkabout lens. Used it on a holiday to the Galapagos with good results.


I am old school. REALY old school. On a recently completed cruise from Sydney, AU to the N&S islands of New Zealand, I took my original D200 w/this lens, and my N90s w/50mm 1:1.4D shooting 400 ISO for low light. The 18-300 was fabulous at both ends of the focus range with the sweet spot between 70 and about 210. Lost a little crispness at the long end, but as stated earlier post-processing took care of that. Very happy with this lens. Best addition I have made to my camera pack. Someday I might upgrade my cameras, but they do what I ask of them and yield good results if I'm at the top of my game.

Reply
Mar 18, 2020 14:50:17   #
jlb0725
 
Chob wrote:
Wondering about anyone's experience using this lens as a single all around, relatively light weight travel lens versus taking two or three other lenses to cover the same range? I intend to mount this lens on Nikon Z50 with the FTZ adapter. My chief concern is image quality though I know that a super zoom like this will necessitate some compromise in this regard. I just don't want to spend $ on poor-fair lens and certainly can wait for the Z mount 24-200 full frame lens (which would be a 36-300mm lens on the Z50 crop sensor) coming out purportedly next month if nothing interferes with it's release. The 18-300 offers a better range, availability, similar weight and is ~1/2 the price and would be a good single lens solution for travel for me unless you Ugly Hedgehogs feel it is not worthy. Thanks for your comments and advice.
Wondering about anyone's experience using this len... (show quote)




I have used the 18-300mm for years now and I love it! Very sharp and an all around good lens. I have printed 16x20” prints. You will not be disappointed 😊

Reply
Mar 18, 2020 14:55:36   #
jlb0725
 
I have used this lens for several years now. It is very sharp and an all around good lens. Great if you only want to carry one versatile lens. I have printed up to 16x20” prints and have gotten several awards for pictures using this lens. You will not be disappointed 😊. Although I have 6 lenses, this one gets used the most.

Reply
 
 
Mar 18, 2020 18:06:03   #
racerrich3 Loc: Los Angeles, Ca.
 
Chob wrote:
Wondering about anyone's experience using this lens as a single all around, relatively light weight travel lens versus taking two or three other lenses to cover the same range? I intend to mount this lens on Nikon Z50 with the FTZ adapter. My chief concern is image quality though I know that a super zoom like this will necessitate some compromise in this regard. I just don't want to spend $ on poor-fair lens and certainly can wait for the Z mount 24-200 full frame lens (which would be a 36-300mm lens on the Z50 crop sensor) coming out purportedly next month if nothing interferes with it's release. The 18-300 offers a better range, availability, similar weight and is ~1/2 the price and would be a good single lens solution for travel for me unless you Ugly Hedgehogs feel it is not worthy. Thanks for your comments and advice.
Wondering about anyone's experience using this len... (show quote)


it's a good lens. bought it for trip to Italy. didn't go yet was supposed to last summer. not sure now even this summer. maybe next summer. anyway been using it a lot anyway on both my D3300/500. and its cheaper than the 18-300 3.5/5.6 . not a pro shooter so I didn't need the extra f/0.7 difference. good luck.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.