Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Be Careful inserting & removing your SD cards....
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Mar 3, 2020 14:55:02   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
JD750 wrote:
WiFi eliminates all the connector problems but it is slow. Why? I get 200mB/s data rate via wfFi on my computer.


It depends entirely what version the wifi is, older cameras will have slower wifi, as in 10 mbs. Wifi for computers has advanced over the years with several different versions/speeds. While you can get higher speeds with todays devices, some still operate at the original slow speed.

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 15:06:42   #
mlkddk Loc: Colorado
 
Been there done that cost me 80$ to fix!

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 15:43:09   #
Wayne Traveler
 
I inserted a micro SD card in a holder into my Motorola G7 phone. It fell out somehow and lodged in the camera. I thought they could split the case and fix it. No way. These phones are sealed. It was not repairable. Since it was under warranty, Motorola replaced the phone.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2020 16:45:51   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
JD750 wrote:
WiFi eliminates all the connector problems but it is slow. Why? I get 200mB/s data rate via wfFi on my computer.


FWIW - Just tried some testing using my Canon 90D on my highspeed wifi network paired to my iMac - took a burst of 20 shots, all raw, each file was 41 MB each on the SD card.

Using wifi, it took 3 minutes and 18 seconds to transfer from camera to computer using Canon's latest Camera Connect software, using a card reader it took 15 seconds to transfer the same amount of data from SD card using Lightroom to import directly from the card as a copy process.

Wifi is handy, BUT wow, is it slow, even when its fast.

I left the configured wifi setup in my menu's just in case, but will probably only make use of Bluetooth using my iPhone as a remote trigger for my 90D.

Will have to do some testing to determine if battery power is substantially affected - I suspect with Bluetooth it is not much of a drain where wifi would be a big hit.

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 16:46:10   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
mlkddk wrote:
Been there done that cost me 80$ to fix!


OUCH!

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 16:46:37   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Wayne Traveler wrote:
I inserted a micro SD card in a holder into my Motorola G7 phone. It fell out somehow and lodged in the camera. I thought they could split the case and fix it. No way. These phones are sealed. It was not repairable. Since it was under warranty, Motorola replaced the phone.


Lucky break!

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 17:11:37   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Peterfiore wrote:
Also check the card reader, that could be where the card was damaged.

I bent body pins once when I was inserting a CF memory card.
I have never caused harm using an SD memory card.
The lesson is to stop pushing if you encounter resistance and figure out why,

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2020 17:42:13   #
jpgto Loc: North East Tennessee
 

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 17:49:21   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Dngallagher wrote:
Never blamed the card.


Excellent.

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 18:38:58   #
DeanS Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
 
I have had a couple or SD cards fail by that little switch coming off. Have never been able to get one back together when that happens. Strange thing is, I have never intentionally moved the switch to the protect position.

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 18:41:13   #
Ioannis
 
I have been using the cable download way since I have owned a digital camera “19 years ago” and I have never had any problems. I know most of you will disagree with me but I don’t know why going through to so many steps by removing the card from the camera is better than the cable.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2020 19:41:59   #
Dngallagher Loc: Wilmington De.
 
Ioannis wrote:
I have been using the cable download way since I have owned a digital camera “19 years ago” and I have never had any problems. I know most of you will disagree with me but I don’t know why going through to so many steps by removing the card from the camera is better than the cable.


Simple, faster for transferring large raw files, lots of them..

I also worry about wearing out the usb socket on the camera.

Reply
Mar 3, 2020 21:05:55   #
11bravo
 
Have been removing SD cards and using a card reader on several cameras over a decade. Never had a problem. Much easier for me than trying to insert a micro USB cord into the camera's TINY slot, and the SD card slot door more robust than the USB door. Besides, have to open the common SD/battery door to remove and recharge the battery. Popping out the SD card and inserting another trivial.

Reply
Mar 8, 2020 21:28:03   #
frangeo Loc: Texas
 
Dngallagher wrote:
FWIW - Yesterday noticed my 90D camera's SD card door was harder to slide and it no longer sprung open as it normally did. It still opened, but was noticably harder to open. The day before when I inserted my SD card after transferring some files it was a little difficult to insert, but eventually went in OK.

This morning I looked closer at the door hinge points and saw something odd sticking out of one side. I was able to use a pair or needle nose pliers to grab it and pull it out with a little effort.

The SD card door went back to normal easy operation and sprung open as usual. Turns out during the card insert the previous night I had broken off a piece of plastic above the lock switch on the card.

Luckily for me it had lodged in the door hinge where the spring goes into the body and had not fallen inside the card slot.
FWIW - Yesterday noticed my 90D camera's SD card d... (show quote)


Love SD cards all you want. I have CF cards that are so used the painted label wore off. SD cards are fragile.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.