Just a couple of shots--virtually the same except that one used a wide angle lens and the other a much wider. Not the extreme WA distortion that I sometimes am drawn to but it shows some of the difference. Which do I personally like better? well if I knew I wouldn't have posted both.
One gets the sort of idealized proportions while the other has rounder "classical?" proportions. Over time (centuries) "ideal" changes just as it does from one society to another.
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?
I really like the 1st photo.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?
I really like the 1st photo.
I agree on both points. Very nice work and a lovely model.
Beautiful work. I often fool with distortion from wide angle and even fish eye.
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?
I really like the 1st photo.
No tats, no piercings, no butt, lips or breast enhancements. Nice!
#1, makes model look elegant. In my opinion the distortion in #2 does nothing to enhance, make different, or show a new way of seeing. It simply doesn't look as good, making model "squatty".
A classic question posed by Wendy's in 1984... "Where's the Beef?"
Now we have the answer ... The Beef is in the lady's calf due to foreshortening by a wide-angle lens.
Both are beautiful, well done!
Beautiful lady--I like them both but prefer the first photo.
I also appreciate the “clean” body.
vertigo wrote:
Just a couple of shots--virtually the same except that one used a wide angle lens and the other a much wider. Not the extreme WA distortion that I sometimes am drawn to but it shows some of the difference. Which do I personally like better? well if I knew I wouldn't have posted both.
One gets the sort of idealized proportions while the other has rounder "classical?" proportions. Over time (centuries) "ideal" changes just as it does from one society to another.
Just a couple of shots--virtually the same except ... (
show quote)
Beautiful model. What were the lenses you used?
Leo_B
Loc: Houston suburb
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?
That's the only way it is possible.
I think the distortion in the second one works against you by making the leg and foot look too large.
TriX wrote:
I agree on both points. Very nice work and a lovely model.
The second photo shortens the thigh too much.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.