Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
Wide angle nudes
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 4, 2020 17:14:22   #
vertigo
 
Just a couple of shots--virtually the same except that one used a wide angle lens and the other a much wider. Not the extreme WA distortion that I sometimes am drawn to but it shows some of the difference. Which do I personally like better? well if I knew I wouldn't have posted both.

One gets the sort of idealized proportions while the other has rounder "classical?" proportions. Over time (centuries) "ideal" changes just as it does from one society to another.





Reply
Feb 4, 2020 19:22:13   #
travelwp Loc: New Jersey
 
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?

I really like the 1st photo.

Reply
Feb 4, 2020 19:53:15   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?

I really like the 1st photo.


I agree on both points. Very nice work and a lovely model.

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Feb 4, 2020 20:13:40   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
Very nice.

Reply
Feb 4, 2020 20:38:11   #
toxdoc42
 
Beautiful work. I often fool with distortion from wide angle and even fish eye.

Reply
Feb 4, 2020 21:43:34   #
MontanaTrace
 
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?

I really like the 1st photo.


No tats, no piercings, no butt, lips or breast enhancements. Nice!

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 01:47:28   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
#1, makes model look elegant. In my opinion the distortion in #2 does nothing to enhance, make different, or show a new way of seeing. It simply doesn't look as good, making model "squatty".

Reply
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Feb 5, 2020 06:22:56   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
A classic question posed by Wendy's in 1984... "Where's the Beef?"
Now we have the answer ... The Beef is in the lady's calf due to foreshortening by a wide-angle lens.

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 08:10:06   #
AZNikon Loc: Mesa, AZ
 
Both are beautiful, well done!

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 08:13:02   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Beautiful lady--I like them both but prefer the first photo.

I also appreciate the “clean” body.

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 09:10:02   #
LeeinNC Loc: Morganton, NC
 
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?

I really like the 1st photo.


A rare find!

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Feb 5, 2020 10:09:41   #
Toby
 
vertigo wrote:
Just a couple of shots--virtually the same except that one used a wide angle lens and the other a much wider. Not the extreme WA distortion that I sometimes am drawn to but it shows some of the difference. Which do I personally like better? well if I knew I wouldn't have posted both.

One gets the sort of idealized proportions while the other has rounder "classical?" proportions. Over time (centuries) "ideal" changes just as it does from one society to another.
Just a couple of shots--virtually the same except ... (show quote)


Beautiful model. What were the lenses you used?

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 12:23:24   #
Leo_B Loc: Houston suburb
 
travelwp wrote:
Is that possible: A beautiful woman with no tattoos?


That's the only way it is possible.

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 21:27:03   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
I think the distortion in the second one works against you by making the leg and foot look too large.

Reply
Feb 5, 2020 21:28:37   #
MontanaTrace
 
TriX wrote:
I agree on both points. Very nice work and a lovely model.


The second photo shortens the thigh too much.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.