Just the facts, ma'am.
Feb 1, 2020 08:57:53 #
Feb 1, 2020 09:05:43 #
I have been saying that for years. MSNBC is just as bad. As odd as it seems Aljazeera news is the only news that come close to being truthful.
Feb 1, 2020 09:18:07 #
Feb 1, 2020 09:20:27 #
5dogsken wrote:
Type "fox viewer ignorance" into your search engine.
Hardly a secret, but each side has its own opinion. One opinion is just as good as another, right? Like, is global warming real? Does gravity really work? Are there lizard people on the dark side of the moon? Some people either don't know the difference between fact and opinion, or they simply reject facts.
I see this moving quickly to The Attic.
Feb 1, 2020 09:26:23 #
Feb 1, 2020 09:36:45 #
Feb 1, 2020 09:36:58 #
Nope: "One opinion is just as good as another, right?" Each has its own weight depending on content, analysis, and presentation. Etc.
jerryc41 wrote:
Hardly a secret, but each side has its own opinion. One opinion is just as good as another, right? Like, is global warming real? Does gravity really work? Are there lizard people on the dark side of the moon? Some people either don't know the difference between fact and opinion, or they simply reject facts.
I see this moving quickly to The Attic.
I see this moving quickly to The Attic.
Feb 1, 2020 09:37:37 #
Feb 1, 2020 09:42:44 #
Feb 1, 2020 09:42:59 #
gvarner
Loc: Central Oregon Coast
You have to be able to sort the grain from the chafe, that’s all. For those who declare that "it’s all bad", how do you deal with that? How do you get your information? You must have some mechanism to sort out the grain or do you just stick your head in the sand?
Feb 2, 2020 06:08:58 #
5dogsken wrote:
Type "fox viewer ignorance" into your search engine.
What does that prove besides search engines looking for weird posts matching the parameter entered.
Feb 2, 2020 06:48:36 #
Architect1776 wrote:
What does that prove besides search engines looking for weird posts matching the parameter entered.
It proves fox viewers are clueless as to what's happening in the real world. Did you actually READ any of the links? If you did, you wouldn't have asked that question. Thanks for proving my point!
Feb 2, 2020 07:51:22 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
5dogsken wrote:
It proves fox viewers are clueless as to what's happening in the real world. Did you actually READ any of the links? If you did, you wouldn't have asked that question. Thanks for proving my point!
Show me the facts to back that up.
Feb 2, 2020 08:09:14 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
A cursory search didn’t show the methodology of said poll, other that it was a sample of 612 New Jersey residents.
It shows that people who read are more informed than people who get their news from TV, that most NJ residents couldn’t name both presidential candidates.
It shows that people who read are more informed than people who get their news from TV, that most NJ residents couldn’t name both presidential candidates.
Feb 2, 2020 08:17:08 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
5dogsken wrote:
Show me the facts to back that up.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2011/jun/20/jon-stewart/jon-stewart-says-those-who-watch-fox-news-are-most/
A real survey with actual methodology, actually more than one, shows that your story is fake and phony and smells like it fell from the arse of a pony.
In the future ... be careful what you ask for.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.